MCP servers › com.programscape › programscape
MCP server · registry snapshot 2026-10-23 · last tested 2026-10-23
com.programscape/programscape
Startup credits, programs and perks that fit your company, from checked, sourced records. — the publisher's description
Summary
com.programscape/programscape is a remote MCP server listed in the official MCP registry at version 1.0.0. On 2026-10-23 ProtocolProbe connected to it in read-only mode and read its inventory: 12 tools, 0 resources and 0 prompts.
Record checks
4 of 5 record checks met · 4 do not apply
- met: Registry entry is active and says how to run it
- met: Source repository link opens
- met: Repository is not archived
- met: Code pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our check
- not met: Repository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)
- not applicable: Package names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifier
- not applicable: The version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawn
- not applicable: npm package carries build provenance (attestation)
- not applicable: No known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependencies
- Not ranked by downloads: a remote server publishes no download figure
- Not ranked by stars: 0 stars (ranked from 10)
From public records, not a safety rating. Each check with its reason · Is it safe to install?
Key facts
- Runs
- remote (hosted by the publisher)
- Transport
- streamable HTTP
- Sign-in
- none needed to open a session
- Repository
- public
- Tools
- 12
- Described as changing data
- 3 of 12 toolsAI-classified
- Topic
- commerce-and-marketingAI-classified
- Last tested
- 2026-10-23
Observed fact
This server accepted a session without any credential and lists 2 tools whose name or declaration suggests they change data (update_my_plan, save_plan_draft). That is our reading of the names; we did not call them. Source: our connection, 2026-10-23.
Worth knowing before you connect it
- 3 tools are described as changing something (update_my_plan, report_balance, save_plan_draft): our AI model's reading of the descriptions, not something we tested, and the server opened a session without any credential. We did not call them.
Each line comes from a section below, with its source and date.
How fresh this is
- Live-tested
- yes, a real session (not a text-only review)
- Last tested
- 2026-10-23
- Mode
- read-only (no tool calls)
- Latest version
- 1.0.0, published 2026-10-07 (registry, as of the 2026-10-23 snapshot)
- First listed version
- 2026-10-07 (earliest version still in the registry; older removed versions would be earlier)
- Registry data
- snapshot 2026-10-23
- Package and repository
- checked 2026-10-22
- Engine
- mcp-runtime-engine@0.1.0 · sdk@1.32.0
Changes since the last refresh
New in the registry: not in the list of 2026-10-04, listed on 2026-10-23 with version 1.0.0 (published 2026-10-07).
Source: the official MCP Registry list on 2026-10-04 and on 2026-10-23.
What it is
What does this server offer?
Observed inventory3 of 12 tools are described as changing something (creating, editing, deleting, sending or running).
- build_routereads or searches
“Returns the review Programscape would show a founder, from what they have said about their company (stage, funding, the tools they use, company type and answers to earlier questions): a short read of…”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
2 inputs, 1 required
answersobjectrequired“The founder’s answers, keyed by question field: the shared questions’ fields or a question a review returned (e.g.”inferredAnswersarray“The worked-out partner answers a saved plan returned as inferredAnswers, exactly as returned: the review reads them as Programscape worked them out, not as the…”
- my_planreads or searches
“Returns the founder’s saved Programscape plan: their answers, the programs they kept or set aside (a kept program says whether the founder marked it approved; an approved one carries the expiration d…”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
1 input
planIdstring“Which saved plan, if the founder has more than one.”
- update_my_plancreates or changes datadescribed as changing data
“Saves answers and program choices to the founder’s own Programscape plan: new or changed answers, programs to keep, programs to set aside.”
Publisher declares: read-only no · destructive yes · idempotent no · open-world no
4 inputs
planIdstring“Which saved plan, if the founder has more than one.”answersobject“New or changed answers the founder gave, keyed by question field as in a review’s answers.”keeparray“Program ids the founder wants to keep in their plan.”setAsidearray“Program ids the founder wants to set aside.”
- report_balancecreates or changes datadescribed as changing data
“Records the balance a provider shows for one program the founder keeps on their Programscape plan and has marked approved: the amount left, in the unit the provider reports it (US dollars, credits or…”
Publisher declares: read-only no · destructive no · idempotent no · open-world no
8 inputs, 3 required
planIdstring“Which saved plan, if the founder has more than one.”programIdstringrequired“The id of a program the founder keeps on their plan and has marked approved, for example "firecrawl.startup-deal".”amountnumberrequired“What the provider shows as left, in `unit`, exactly as reported: dollars to the cent, or a whole number of credits or requests.”unitstringrequired“The unit the provider reports the balance in: usd, credits or requests.”asOfstring“When the balance was read from the provider, as an ISO 8601 date and time.”sourcestring“Who is reporting: "router" for the founder’s own credit router, "assistant" for an AI assistant the founder asked.”lowBalanceAtobject“Optional: the number under which the founder asked to be reminded, in the balance’s unit.”estimateobject“Router only (0151): how long this balance lasts at the recent pace.”
- portfolio_perksreads or searches
“If the founder joined a venture firm’s or studio’s perks on Programscape (for example PSL’s), returns that portfolio’s negotiated deals in the partner’s own words, labelled as the partner’s terms, an…”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
Takes no inputs.
- partner_perks_adminreads or searches
“For the admin of a venture firm’s or studio’s perks list on Programscape (for example PSL’s): what needs a look (deals due to re-confirm, linked programs that changed or closed, imported deals not ye…”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
Takes no inputs.
- save_plan_draftcreates or changes datadescribed as changing data
“Saves a founder’s review as a one-day draft and returns a link that opens it on programscape.com with their answers and kept programs in place.”
Publisher declares: read-only no · destructive no · idempotent no · open-world no
3 inputs, 1 required
answersobjectrequired“The founder’s answers, keyed by question field: the shared questions’ fields or a question a review returned (e.g.”inferredAnswersarray“The worked-out partner answers a saved plan returned as inferredAnswers, exactly as returned: the review reads them as Programscape worked them out, not as the…”keeparray“Ids of programs the founder chose to keep.”
- profile_questionsreads or searches
“Returns the shared questions, with their answer options, that shape a founder’s review.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
Takes no inputs.
“Searches the reviewed catalog of startup credits, programs, support and product discounts across providers (AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, OpenAI, Anthropic, NVIDIA, Stripe and more).”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
5 inputs
querystring“Words to match against program names, headlines, products and providers.”providerstring“A provider id such as "aws", "gcp", "openai" or "stripe".”kindstring“"programs" for startup programs and support, "offers" for product discounts, "all" for both (the default).”limitinteger“How many results to return (default 20, at most 50).”capabilitiesarray“Agent-tool capabilities, e.g.”
“Returns one program’s reviewed record: what it offers, the agent-tool capabilities its product offers where reviewed, who decides, exclusions, official sources and the date checked.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
1 input, 1 required
idstringrequired“A program id as it appears in program records (e.g.”
“Returns families of programs that serve the same goal across providers, side by side, with no winner and no score.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
2 inputs
goalstring“Limit to programs serving one goal, e.g.”stagestring“Limit to programs for one stage, e.g.”
“Returns what Programscape’s latest checks against the providers’ own pages found, dated and sourced.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
1 input
limitinteger“How many of the latest re-checks to return (default 3).”
Each quoted sentence is the first sentence of the publisher’s own description. The kind of tool and the “changes data” mark are our AI model’s reading of that description, not something we tested: two differently worded runs had to agree, otherwise no label is shown, and nobody has checked them by hand. A tool without the “changes data” mark is described as only reading, searching or calculating, or the two runs did not agree. No tool was called. Read the publisher’s full description before relying on it. “Publisher declares” lists the hints the server itself sends with the tool (MCP annotations: read-only, destructive, idempotent, open-world); they are the publisher's claims, not checked by us. Inputs are the parameters in the tool's own input schema: name, declared type, whether it is required, and the first sentence of its description. Read 2026-10-23.
How well are its tools described?
Features #4 and #5
How clearly this server's own tool descriptions say what a tool does, and how consistent its tool list is. The first part is an AI model's yes/no reading of each description; the second part is counted. We do not turn it into a grade.
Descriptions
AI reading of each description
- Says what the tool does
- 100% of 12 tools
- Says what it returns
- 91% of 11 tools
- States limits, defaults or errors
- 17% of 12 tools
- Says when to use it
- 100% of 4 tools
- Items covered per tool
- 3.0 of 4 on average
Counted from the listing
- Parameters with a description
- 100% of 27
- Tools with a description
- 100% of 12
- Typical description length
- 348 characters
The tool set
Counted from the listing
- Tools
- 12
- Size of the list
- about 4,377 tokens for an agent to load (characters ÷ 4)
- Naming
- 12 of 12 names use snake_case
AI reading: easy to mix up
No pair found.
The AI items cover 12 of 12 tools: for a tool where two differently worded runs disagreed, that item is left out. They were not checked by hand, and no tool was called. “Easy to mix up” means two tools whose names or descriptions overlap without saying how they differ; the AI found none. We do not rate whether the tool set is complete or whether side effects are spelled out, because our AI reading of those was not reliable enough.
How do I add it to my client?
Config from the registry entry
From the remote endpoint (Streamable HTTP)
We connected to this URL on 2026-10-23 (a read-only session: no tool was called).
Add to CursorAn install link in the format Cursor documents, holding the Cursor config below.
Claude Desktop or claude.ai
Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector, then paste: https://programscape.com/api/mcp
Cursor · .cursor/mcp.json in a project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"programscape": {
"url": "https://programscape.com/api/mcp"
}
}
}VS Code · .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"programscape": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://programscape.com/api/mcp"
}
}
}VS Code (command line) · Bash or zsh terminal (macOS, Linux)
code --add-mcp '{"name":"programscape","type":"http","url":"https://programscape.com/api/mcp"}'Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http programscape https://programscape.com/api/mcp
Try it in the MCP Inspector · runs on your machine, opens in your browser · Node 22.19+
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector@2.11.0 --server-url https://programscape.com/api/mcp --transport http
- The server runs on the operator's infrastructure; it may ask you to sign in when you first connect.
- The MCP Inspector lists the server's tools, resources and prompts; a tool you call there runs for real.
Built from the server's registry entry with each client's documented format (checked 2026-10-14; the Cursor link and the VS Code command 2026-10-19; the MCP Inspector command 2026-10-21). Values in < > are yours to fill in; this page never contains a key. Where the server needs a setting the entry does not declare, it can still fail to start.
Does the registry listing match what we found?
Feature #6The registry verifies a package once, when it is published, and does not re-check it. A difference below is about the listing, not a judgement of the publisher.
| Registry says | We found | Result | Source · date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remote endpoint programscape.com/api/mcp | Session opened | matches | our test · 2026-10-23 |
| No credential declared as required | Opened a session without any credential | matches | our test · 2026-10-23 |
| Repository github.com/Deirfgeiz/programscape-mcp | Opens publicly | matches | api.github.com · 2026-10-22 |
Who made it?
Feature #7 · lineage
Facts about the publisher. We do not turn them into a trust score.
- Namespace
- com.programscape
- GitHub owner
- a personal account (Deirfgeiz)
- Repository
- github.com/Deirfgeiz/programscape-mcp
- Stars
- 0
- Repository age
- 0–30 days
- Last push
- 0–30 days ago
- Archived
- no
- Security policy
- none found (we looked for SECURITY.md in the repository and in its owner’s .github repository)
Source: the registry entry and api.github.com · 2026-10-22; security policy read from GitHub · 2026-10-23.
Publish this server? Run these checks against it yourself before release, from your own machine: a server the command starts, or your own server at its URL after a one-time proof that you control it: npx protocolprobe-selftest.
Choosing
Record checks
Public records · not a safety rating4 of 5 record checks met · 4 do not apply
- Not ranked by downloads: a remote server publishes no download figure
- Not ranked by stars: 0 stars (ranked from 10)
- MetRegistry entry is active and says how to run itActive, with a package or a remote address.
- MetSource repository link opensThe linked GitHub repository is public.
- MetRepository is not archivedNot archived.
- MetCode pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our checkLast push 0-30 days before our check.
- Not metRepository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)No SECURITY.md in the places GitHub reads it from.
- Does not applyPackage names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifierRemote server: it ships no package.
- Does not applyThe version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawnRemote server: it ships no package.
- Does not applynpm package carries build provenance (attestation)Remote server: it ships no package.
- Does not applyNo known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependenciesRemote server: it ships no package.
Read from public records only: the registry entry, npm/PyPI, GitHub and advisory databases, checked 2026-10-22. No tool was called. Only “met” and “not met” are counted, so the total differs between servers; a check that does not apply or that we could not run is listed, never counted against it. It is not a safety rating. How each check works · Leaderboards
Common questions about com.programscape/programscape
Answered from the data aboveIs com.programscape/programscape safe to install?
We do not rate servers as safe or unsafe. 4 of its 5 applicable record checks are met (facts from public records, each listed on this page). What the records show: Its source repository opens publicly. Its repository had a push in the last 90 days. 3 of its tools describe changing data (our AI model's reading of the descriptions). These are facts with their sources on this page, not a safety guarantee, and we did not run its tools.
Does com.programscape/programscape need an API key or sign-in?
It opened a session without any credential on 2026-10-23. The registry entry declares no required credential; no declaration is not a guarantee.
Has com.programscape/programscape been security tested?
Partly. 3 of the 15 checks that apply to it were exercised. It accepted a session without any credential and lists tools whose names suggest they change data. We did not call them. No security verdict is published before verification.
What can com.programscape/programscape do?
It lists 12 tools. In our AI model's reading of their descriptions (two runs had to agree, nobody checked it by hand), they include tools that read or search and create or change data. We did not call any tool, so this describes the text, not the behaviour.
Can com.programscape/programscape change or delete data?
3 of its tools say in their description that they create, edit, delete, send or run something (our AI model's reading). We did not call any tool, so we cannot say what actually happens.
Does com.programscape/programscape publish a security policy?
We found no SECURITY.md in its repository (root, .github/ or docs/) or in its owner's .github repository.
Where is the source code of com.programscape/programscape?
In github.com/Deirfgeiz/programscape-mcp, which opens publicly.
Found this page useful?
Anonymous · no sign-inA quick, anonymous reaction — no account, no email. One per kind from your browser. The tally updates when the page is next refreshed, and it is only a rough count, never a safety rating or a measured number of people.
Similar servers
Same topic · AI-read
- io.github.LetsFG/letsfgLetsFG — Flights & Hotelsalso has tools that creates or changes data, reads or searchescompare with this one
- io.github.avansaber/seo-monsteralso has tools that creates or changes data, reads or searchescompare with this one
- com.submitmap/directoryalso has tools that creates or changes data, reads or searchescompare with this one
- io.github.mgwalkerjr95/texas-groceryalso has tools that creates or changes data, reads or searchescompare with this one
- io.github.ilyautov/marketplaces-mcp-ruMarketplaces MCP (RU) — Wildberries, Ozon, Yandex Market, Avitoalso has tools that creates or changes data, reads or searchescompare with this one
- io.github.Samyrrrrrr990/openleadsOpenLeadsalso has tools that creates or changes data, reads or searchescompare with this one
Active servers whose topic is also “commerce-and-marketing” and that have at least one tool of the same kind; most kinds in common first, then most GitHub stars. The topic and the tool kinds are an AI model's reading of the publishers' descriptions, not checked by hand. Similar is not a recommendation.
Compare with another server
Side by side: registry entry, our read-only session, the tools and the 18 classification fields. Same values as each page; no score.
Security testing
What did we test, and what did we leave out?
18 checks · features #1, #2
Open without sign-in
It accepted a session without any credential and lists tools whose names suggest they change data. We did not call them. No security score is given; a check we did not run is never counted as passed.
- Inventory: exercised
- Hidden instructions: exercised
- Real execution: not run · our policy
- Secret leak: not run · nothing to check it against
- Internal addresses: not run · our policy
- Unconfirmed changes: not run · our policy
- Bad input: not run · our policy
- Model requests: not run · nothing to check it against
- Sensitive questions: not run · nothing to check it against
- Folder boundary: not run · our policy
- Log leaks: not run · nothing to check it against
- Hidden content: not run · nothing to check it against
- Fake assistant turns: not applicable
- Token passthrough: not applicable
- Token audience: not applicable
- Sign-in redirect: not run · our policy
- Consent handling: not testable from outside
- Sign-in metadata: exercised
3 exercised12 not run (reason given)3 not applicable
Each check ends in exactly one state: exercised, not run (with the reason), or not applicable (with the reason). 3 of the 15 checks that apply to it were exercised. We do not publish security-check outcomes for named servers.
- 1Inventory
tool-listReads the declared tools, resources and prompts.exercised - 2Hidden instructions
description-poisoningLooks for hidden instructions in tool descriptions.exercised - 18Sign-in metadata
oauth-url-schemeChecks the published sign-in metadata for unsafe URLs.exercised
- 3Real execution
real-executionCalls a tool and checks what really happens.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy - 4Secret leak
canary-leakPlants a fake secret and checks whether it leaks.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against - 5Internal addresses
ssrfChecks whether a tool can be steered to internal addresses.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy - 6Unconfirmed changes
write-without-confirmationChecks whether tools that change data act without asking.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy - 7Bad input
error-handlingSends bad input and watches how the server answers.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy - 8Model requests
samplingChecks whether the server asks the client's model to act for it.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against - 9Sensitive questions
elicitation-sensitive-dataChecks whether the server asks users for sensitive data.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against - 10Folder boundary
root-boundaryChecks whether the server reaches outside the folders it was given.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy - 11Log leaks
logging-side-channelChecks whether log messages carry data they should not.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against - 12Hidden content
audience-hidingChecks resources that hide content from the user.This check needs content the server returns, and nothing was read or called.not run · nothing to check it against - 16Sign-in redirect
open-redirectChecks the sign-in redirect for abuse.Testing the sign-in redirect means sending probes to the operator's sign-in service, which we do not do.not run · our policy - 17Consent handling
confused-deputyChecks consent handling when one service acts for another.Depends on the operator's own consent screen, which differs per server and cannot be tested from outside.not testable from outside
- 13Fake assistant turns
fake-assistant-turnChecks prompts that pose as the assistant's own words.The server exposes no prompts.not applicable - 14Token passthrough
token-passthroughChecks whether the server forwards a user's token to other services.The server opened a session without sign-in, so there is no token flow to check.not applicable - 15Token audience
token-audience-validationChecks whether tokens meant for another service are accepted.The server opened a session without sign-in, so there is no token flow to check.not applicable
Source: our own test, 2026-10-23, mcp-runtime-engine@0.1.0. Which checks count and why follows our published scoring model.
What happened during the test?
Feature #8
The steps in order, as the test record holds them.
- 0 msStarted a read-only session with the server's remote endpoint
- 1,393 msConnected after 0 redirects. No credential was sent or needed.
- Read the inventory: 12 tools, 0 resources, 0 prompts.
- 4,527 msFinished: 3 checks exercised.
Reference
How is it classified?
18 fields
One value per field, each with its source. Fields written by AI models are marked. A field with no value says why.
“Not stated” means the source did not state it; “does not apply” means it does not apply to this kind of server; “our limit” means our own lookup failed. A linked value opens the directory filtered to the same value.
Cite or correct this page
Sources and corrections
Suggested citation
ProtocolProbe. “com.programscape/programscape: MCP server record.” Data checked 2026-10-23. https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/com.programscape/programscape
Figures are valid for the date shown. Our facts on this page are CC BY 4.0: reuse them with a link and the check date. Quoted text (the publisher’s descriptions, website quotes, tool names) is not ours to license.
As JSON: this record in the API · API documentation.
Badge for your README
[](https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/com.programscape/programscape)
It shows this server's record-check count: facts from public records, no tool called. It is not a security rating or a pass. It links here and updates after each data reload.
Something wrong, or is this yours?
If a fact here is wrong, tell us and we will re-check it. If you operate this server, you can run our checks on it yourself with the free self-test command; we call no server’s tools ourselves for anything shown here.
Write to hello@protocolprobe.com · corrections log · methodology