MCP servers › com.regaffairsai › regaffairs
MCP server · registry snapshot 2026-10-23 · last tested 2026-10-23
com.regaffairsai/regaffairs
Cited answers on chemical, food, pharma, device, cosmetic and pesticide rules, linked to sources. — the publisher's description
Summary
com.regaffairsai/regaffairs is a remote MCP server listed in the official MCP registry at version 1.0.0. On 2026-10-23 ProtocolProbe connected to it in read-only mode and read its inventory: 15 tools, 0 resources and 0 prompts.
Record checks
1 of 2 record checks met · 7 do not apply
- met: Registry entry is active and says how to run it
- not met: Source repository link opens
- not applicable: Repository is not archived
- not applicable: Code pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our check
- not applicable: Repository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)
- not applicable: Package names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifier
- not applicable: The version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawn
- not applicable: npm package carries build provenance (attestation)
- not applicable: No known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependencies
- Not ranked by downloads: a remote server publishes no download figure
- Not ranked by stars: no public GitHub repository
From public records, not a safety rating. Each check with its reason
Key facts
- Runs
- remote (hosted by the publisher)
- Transport
- streamable HTTP
- Sign-in
- none needed to open a session
- Tools
- 15
- Described as changing data
- 0 of 15 toolsAI-classified
- Mainly works on
- nothing outside itself: it only answers questionsAI-classified
- Topic
- science-health-and-educationAI-classified
- Pricing
- freemiumAI-classified
- Last tested
- 2026-10-23
How fresh this is
- Live-tested
- yes, a real session (not a text-only review)
- Last tested
- 2026-10-23
- Mode
- read-only (no tool calls)
- Latest version
- 1.0.0, published 2026-10-09 (registry, as of the 2026-10-23 snapshot)
- First listed version
- 2026-10-09 (earliest version still in the registry; older removed versions would be earlier)
- Registry data
- snapshot 2026-10-23
- Package and repository
- checked 2026-10-22
- Engine
- mcp-runtime-engine@0.1.0 · sdk@1.32.0
Changes since the last refresh
New in the registry: not in the list of 2026-10-04, listed on 2026-10-23 with version 1.0.0 (published 2026-10-09).
Source: the official MCP Registry list on 2026-10-04 and on 2026-10-23.
What it is
What does this server offer?
Observed inventoryWhat it mainly works on, as our AI model read its tool descriptions: nothing outside itself: it only answers questions.
None of its 15 tools are described as changing anything.
- regaffairs_ask_question
“Answers a regulatory question that needs reasoning across several sources, jurisdictions or industries, or one that no industry tool covers.”
Publisher declares: read-only no · destructive no · idempotent no · open-world yes
3 inputs, 1 required
questionstringrequired“The question in the user's words.”jurisdictionsarray“Optional ISO codes to focus on, e.g.”industrystring“Optional hint.”
- regaffairs_get_answer_statusreads or searches
“Fetches the result of a `regaffairs_ask_question` call that returned `status: "running"` and an `answer_id`.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
1 input, 1 required
answer_idstringrequired
- regaffairs_search_regulationsreads or searches
“Searches the wording of regulations, guidelines and register entries, for questions that need the text rather than a written answer or that fall in an area no industry tool covers, such as REACH or C…”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
6 inputs
querystring“What to search for, in the dataset's language when it is not English.”document_idstring“Read passages from one document returned earlier.”industrystringdatasetsarray“Optional dataset ids to restrict the search (from regaffairs_list_covered_regulations).”jurisdictionsarraylimitinteger
- regaffairs_list_covered_regulationsreads or searches
“Lists what RegAffairs AI covers ("do you have the EU Cosmetics Regulation?", "which Brazil pesticide registers are in?", "what do you cover for food in the UK?"), and checks before answering that a r…”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
4 inputs
querystringindustrystringjurisdictionsarraylimitinteger
- regaffairs_check_chemical_substancereads or searches
“Checks whether one or more chemical substances (name, CAS or EC number) are registered, listed, restricted or banned, and screens a bill of materials.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
4 inputs, 1 required
substancesarrayrequired“Names, CAS (e.g.”jurisdictionsarray“Default: all.”listsarray“Default: all lists for the chosen jurisdictions.”identity_onlyboolean“Only resolve name, CAS and EC (for ambiguous names, salts, hydrates, group entries).”
- regaffairs_get_ghs_hazard_classificationreads or searches
“Looks up a substance's hazard classification, GHS pictograms, H-statements, signal word or label elements (for example for SDS sections 2 and 3 or a CLP label), and its UN number and transport hazard…”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
5 inputs, 1 required
substancestringrequired“Name, CAS, EC, CLP index number or UN number (e.g.”jurisdictionsarrayinclude_notifiedboolean“Add the C&L Inventory notified classifications.”include_pendingboolean“Add open CLH intentions and RAC opinions.”include_transportboolean“Add the US DOT 49 CFR 172.101 entry (UN number, class, packing group).”
- regaffairs_get_workplace_exposure_limitsreads or searches
“Looks up occupational exposure limits for a substance (OEL, WEL, PEL, AGW, VLEP, MAC, STEL) in one or more countries, for example for SDS section 8, a COSHH assessment or an OSHA compliance check.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
3 inputs, 1 required
substancestringrequired“Name, CAS or EC number.”countriesarray“Default: all held.”limit_typesarray“Default: all.”
- regaffairs_check_food_additive_or_ingredientreads or searches
“Checks whether a food additive (E-number), colour additive, novel food, vitamin or mineral form, food contact substance or contaminant limit is allowed, and under which conditions, in the EU or US.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
5 inputs, 1 required
ingredientstringrequired“Name, E-number (e.g.”jurisdictionsarrayregimestringfood_categorystring“Optional, e.g.”contact_materialstring“For food contact questions.”
- regaffairs_check_food_label_and_allergensreads or searches
“Answers what a food label must show (mandatory particulars, nutrition declaration, ingredients list, allergen emphasis, gluten-free, date marking), which allergens must be declared, and whether a nut…”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
4 inputs, 1 required
topicstringrequireddetailstring“The allergen, claim wording, nutrient or particular, e.g.”jurisdictionsarrayfood_typestring“Optional, e.g.”
- regaffairs_check_cosmetic_ingredientreads or searches
“Checks whether a cosmetic ingredient is banned, restricted or permitted, and gives its INCI name, maximum concentration, product-type conditions and label warnings.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
6 inputs, 1 required
ingredientstringrequired“INCI name, common name, CAS or EC.”jurisdictionsarrayapplicationstringproduct_typestring“Optional, e.g.”for_children_under_3booleanfunctionstring“Optional, narrows to the matching annex.”
- regaffairs_check_pesticide_approval_and_mrlreads or searches
“Checks whether a plant protection active substance is approved, banned or under review, and gives the maximum residue level (MRL) or tolerance for a crop.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
4 inputs, 1 required
active_substancestringrequired“Active substance name or CAS, e.g.”jurisdictionsarraycropstring“For MRLs or tolerances, e.g.”includearray
- regaffairs_check_biocide_active_substancereads or searches
“Checks whether a biocidal active substance is approved and for which product types (PT1 to PT22), whether a supplier is on the Article 95 list, whether a biocidal product or disinfectant is authorise…”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
6 inputs
active_substancestring“Active substance name or CAS, e.g.”product_namestring“Biocidal product or disinfectant name, or an EPA registration number.”product_typestring“e.g.”jurisdictionsarraytarget_pathogenstring“For US disinfectant lists, e.g.”include_suppliersboolean“Add Article 95 supplier entries.”
Show 3 more tools
- regaffairs_find_pharma_gmp_and_ich_guidancereads or searches
“Finds what a GMP or ICH guideline requires and the text of a GMP annex or ICH guideline, and checks whether a UK site holds an MHRA manufacturing or wholesale (GMP/GDP) licence.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
4 inputs
querystring“The GMP or ICH topic, e.g.”sourcestringguidelinestring“Code or annex, e.g.”site_or_companystring“For MHRA licence lookups: company or site name, or licence number.”
- regaffairs_check_drug_or_device_approvalreads or searches
“Checks whether a medicine is authorised in a market, with its approval details and shortage status, or a medical device's classification, registration, approval or notified body.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
4 inputs, 1 required
productstringrequired“Medicine brand or active ingredient, DIN, NDA/ANDA number, device name, FDA product code (e.g.”product_kindstringjurisdictionsarray“Default: all held for the product kind.”includearray
- regaffairs_check_textile_restricted_substancesreads or searches
“Checks whether a substance is restricted in textiles, clothing, footwear or leather and what limit applies under a brand or certification list, and what a textile fibre, care or flammability label mu…”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
5 inputs
substancesarray“Names, CAS numbers or substance groups, e.g.”topicstring“What to check.”listsarray“Default: all.”product_classstring“OEKO-TEX product class I to IV.”jurisdictionsarray
Each quoted sentence is the first sentence of the publisher’s own description. The kind of tool and the “changes data” mark are our AI model’s reading of that description, not something we tested: two differently worded runs had to agree, otherwise no label is shown, and nobody has checked them by hand. A tool without the “changes data” mark is described as only reading, searching or calculating, or the two runs did not agree. No tool was called. Read the publisher’s full description before relying on it. “Publisher declares” lists the hints the server itself sends with the tool (MCP annotations: read-only, destructive, idempotent, open-world); they are the publisher's claims, not checked by us. Inputs are the parameters in the tool's own input schema: name, declared type, whether it is required, and the first sentence of its description. Read 2026-10-23.
How well are its tools described?
Features #4 and #5
How clearly this server's own tool descriptions say what a tool does, and how consistent its tool list is. The first part is an AI model's yes/no reading of each description; the second part is counted. We do not turn it into a grade.
Descriptions
AI reading of each description
- Says what the tool does
- 100% of 15 tools
- Says what it returns
- 100% of 15 tools
- States limits, defaults or errors
- 0% of 12 tools
- Says when to use it
- 100% of 15 tools
- Items covered per tool
- 3.2 of 4 on average
Counted from the listing
- Parameters with a description
- 64% of 64
- Tools with a description
- 100% of 15
- Typical description length
- 922 characters
The tool set
Counted from the listing
- Tools
- 15
- Size of the list
- about 15,112 tokens for an agent to load (characters ÷ 4)
- Naming
- 15 of 15 names use snake_case
AI reading: easy to mix up
No pair found.
The AI items cover 15 of 15 tools: for a tool where two differently worded runs disagreed, that item is left out. They were not checked by hand, and no tool was called. “Easy to mix up” means two tools whose names or descriptions overlap without saying how they differ; the AI found none. We do not rate whether the tool set is complete or whether side effects are spelled out, because our AI reading of those was not reliable enough.
How do I add it to my client?
Config from the registry entry
From the remote endpoint (Streamable HTTP)
We connected to this URL on 2026-10-23 (a read-only session: no tool was called).
Add to CursorAn install link in the format Cursor documents, holding the Cursor config below.
Claude Desktop or claude.ai
Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector, then paste: https://mcp.regaffairsai.com/mcp
Cursor · .cursor/mcp.json in a project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"regaffairs": {
"url": "https://mcp.regaffairsai.com/mcp"
}
}
}VS Code · .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"regaffairs": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.regaffairsai.com/mcp"
}
}
}VS Code (command line) · Bash or zsh terminal (macOS, Linux)
code --add-mcp '{"name":"regaffairs","type":"http","url":"https://mcp.regaffairsai.com/mcp"}'Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http regaffairs https://mcp.regaffairsai.com/mcp
Try it in the MCP Inspector · runs on your machine, opens in your browser · Node 22.19+
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector@2.11.0 --server-url https://mcp.regaffairsai.com/mcp --transport http
- The server runs on the operator's infrastructure; it may ask you to sign in when you first connect.
- The MCP Inspector lists the server's tools, resources and prompts; a tool you call there runs for real.
Built from the server's registry entry with each client's documented format (checked 2026-10-14; the Cursor link and the VS Code command 2026-10-19; the MCP Inspector command 2026-10-21). Values in < > are yours to fill in; this page never contains a key. Where the server needs a setting the entry does not declare, it can still fail to start.
Does the registry listing match what we found?
Feature #6The registry verifies a package once, when it is published, and does not re-check it. A difference below is about the listing, not a judgement of the publisher.
| Registry says | We found | Result | Source · date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remote endpoint mcp.regaffairsai.com/mcp | Session opened | matches | our test · 2026-10-23 |
| No credential declared as required | Opened a session without any credential | matches | our test · 2026-10-23 |
Choosing
Record checks
Public records · not a safety rating1 of 2 record checks met · 7 do not apply
- Not ranked by downloads: a remote server publishes no download figure
- Not ranked by stars: no public GitHub repository
- MetRegistry entry is active and says how to run itActive, with a package or a remote address.
- Not metSource repository link opensThe registry entry gives no repository link.
- Does not applyRepository is not archivedNo public GitHub repository to read.
- Does not applyCode pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our checkNo public GitHub repository to read.
- Does not applyRepository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)No public GitHub repository to read.
- Does not applyPackage names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifierRemote server: it ships no package.
- Does not applyThe version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawnRemote server: it ships no package.
- Does not applynpm package carries build provenance (attestation)Remote server: it ships no package.
- Does not applyNo known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependenciesRemote server: it ships no package.
Read from public records only: the registry entry, npm/PyPI, GitHub and advisory databases, checked 2026-10-22. No tool was called. Only “met” and “not met” are counted, so the total differs between servers; a check that does not apply or that we could not run is listed, never counted against it. It is not a safety rating. How each check works · Leaderboards
Common questions about com.regaffairsai/regaffairs
Answered from the data aboveIs com.regaffairsai/regaffairs free to use?
Its website (regaffairsai.com/docs/mcp) describes a freemium pricing model. This is an AI-classified reading of the page on 2026-10-23, so check the page itself before relying on it.
Does com.regaffairsai/regaffairs need an API key or sign-in?
It opened a session without any credential on 2026-10-23. The registry entry declares no required credential; no declaration is not a guarantee.
Has com.regaffairsai/regaffairs been security tested?
Partly. 3 of the 15 checks that apply to it were exercised. We connected and read what the server declares, but did not call its tools: ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes. This is our choice, not a block by the server. No security verdict is published before verification.
What can com.regaffairsai/regaffairs do?
It lists 15 tools. In our AI model's reading of their descriptions (two runs had to agree, nobody checked it by hand), they include tools that read or search. We did not call any tool, so this describes the text, not the behaviour.
Can com.regaffairsai/regaffairs change or delete data?
None of its 15 tools is described as changing anything (our AI model's reading of the descriptions; nobody checked it by hand). We did not call any tool.
Found this page useful?
Anonymous · no sign-inA quick, anonymous reaction — no account, no email. One per kind from your browser. The tally updates when the page is next refreshed, and it is only a rough count, never a safety rating or a measured number of people.
Similar servers
Same topic · AI-read
- io.github.amos689/paper-preflightpaper-preflightalso has tools that reads or searchescompare with this one
- io.github.nietus/anki-mcpAnkialso has tools that reads or searchescompare with this one
- com.mcparmory/canvasalso has tools that reads or searchescompare with this one
- io.github.iowarp/adios-mcpCLIO Adiosalso has tools that reads or searchescompare with this one
- io.github.iowarp/seismology-mcpCLIO Seismologyalso has tools that reads or searchescompare with this one
- io.github.u9401066/pubmed-search-mcpPubMed Searchalso has tools that reads or searchescompare with this one
Active servers whose topic is also “science-health-and-education” and that have at least one tool of the same kind; most kinds in common first, then most GitHub stars. The topic and the tool kinds are an AI model's reading of the publishers' descriptions, not checked by hand. Similar is not a recommendation.
Compare with another server
Side by side: registry entry, our read-only session, the tools and the 18 classification fields. Same values as each page; no score.
Security testing
What did we test, and what did we leave out?
18 checks · features #1, #2
Not probed (we call no server's tools)
We connected and read what the server declares, but did not call its tools: ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes. This is our choice, not a block by the server. No security score is given; a check we did not run is never counted as passed.
- Inventory: exercised
- Hidden instructions: exercised
- Real execution: not run · our policy
- Secret leak: not run · nothing to check it against
- Internal addresses: not run · our policy
- Unconfirmed changes: not run · our policy
- Bad input: not run · our policy
- Model requests: not run · nothing to check it against
- Sensitive questions: not run · nothing to check it against
- Folder boundary: not run · our policy
- Log leaks: not run · nothing to check it against
- Hidden content: not run · nothing to check it against
- Fake assistant turns: not applicable
- Token passthrough: not applicable
- Token audience: not applicable
- Sign-in redirect: not run · our policy
- Consent handling: not testable from outside
- Sign-in metadata: exercised
3 exercised12 not run (reason given)3 not applicable
Each check ends in exactly one state: exercised, not run (with the reason), or not applicable (with the reason). 3 of the 15 checks that apply to it were exercised. We do not publish security-check outcomes for named servers.
- 1Inventory
tool-listReads the declared tools, resources and prompts.exercised - 2Hidden instructions
description-poisoningLooks for hidden instructions in tool descriptions.exercised - 18Sign-in metadata
oauth-url-schemeChecks the published sign-in metadata for unsafe URLs.exercised
- 3Real execution
real-executionCalls a tool and checks what really happens.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy - 4Secret leak
canary-leakPlants a fake secret and checks whether it leaks.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against - 5Internal addresses
ssrfChecks whether a tool can be steered to internal addresses.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy - 6Unconfirmed changes
write-without-confirmationChecks whether tools that change data act without asking.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy - 7Bad input
error-handlingSends bad input and watches how the server answers.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy - 8Model requests
samplingChecks whether the server asks the client's model to act for it.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against - 9Sensitive questions
elicitation-sensitive-dataChecks whether the server asks users for sensitive data.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against - 10Folder boundary
root-boundaryChecks whether the server reaches outside the folders it was given.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy - 11Log leaks
logging-side-channelChecks whether log messages carry data they should not.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against - 12Hidden content
audience-hidingChecks resources that hide content from the user.This check needs content the server returns, and nothing was read or called.not run · nothing to check it against - 16Sign-in redirect
open-redirectChecks the sign-in redirect for abuse.Testing the sign-in redirect means sending probes to the operator's sign-in service, which we do not do.not run · our policy - 17Consent handling
confused-deputyChecks consent handling when one service acts for another.Depends on the operator's own consent screen, which differs per server and cannot be tested from outside.not testable from outside
- 13Fake assistant turns
fake-assistant-turnChecks prompts that pose as the assistant's own words.The server exposes no prompts.not applicable - 14Token passthrough
token-passthroughChecks whether the server forwards a user's token to other services.The server opened a session without sign-in, so there is no token flow to check.not applicable - 15Token audience
token-audience-validationChecks whether tokens meant for another service are accepted.The server opened a session without sign-in, so there is no token flow to check.not applicable
Source: our own test, 2026-10-23, mcp-runtime-engine@0.1.0. Which checks count and why follows our published scoring model.
What happened during the test?
Feature #8
The steps in order, as the test record holds them.
- 0 msStarted a read-only session with the server's remote endpoint
- 1,363 msConnected after 0 redirects. No credential was sent or needed.
- Read the inventory: 15 tools, 0 resources, 0 prompts.
- 4,779 msFinished: 3 checks exercised.
Reference
How is it classified?
18 fields
One value per field, each with its source. Fields written by AI models are marked. A field with no value says why.
“Start free. No credit card required.”
“Not stated” means the source did not state it; “does not apply” means it does not apply to this kind of server; “our limit” means our own lookup failed. A linked value opens the directory filtered to the same value.
Cite or correct this page
Sources and corrections
Suggested citation
ProtocolProbe. “com.regaffairsai/regaffairs: MCP server record.” Data checked 2026-10-23. https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/com.regaffairsai/regaffairs
Figures are valid for the date shown. Our facts on this page are CC BY 4.0: reuse them with a link and the check date. Quoted text (the publisher’s descriptions, website quotes, tool names) is not ours to license.
As JSON: this record in the API · API documentation.
Badge for your README
[](https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/com.regaffairsai/regaffairs)
It shows this server's record-check count: facts from public records, no tool called. It is not a security rating or a pass. It links here and updates after each data reload.
Something wrong, or is this yours?
If a fact here is wrong, tell us and we will re-check it. If you operate this server, you can run our checks on it yourself with the free self-test command; we call no server’s tools ourselves for anything shown here.
Write to hello@protocolprobe.com · corrections log · methodology