MCP servers › com.rightshold › rightshold

MCP server · registry snapshot 2026-10-23 · last tested 2026-10-23

com.rightshold/rightshold

License checks, signed rights proof, keyless pre-call checks for MCP servers, and the agent store — the publisher's description

1 of 2 record checks metRead-only · tools listed 2026-10-23Topic: security · AI-classifiedversion 0.5.1streamable HTTP24 tools

Summary

com.rightshold/rightshold is a remote MCP server listed in the official MCP registry at version 0.5.1. On 2026-10-23 ProtocolProbe connected to it in read-only mode and read its inventory: 24 tools, 3 resources and 0 prompts.

Record checks

1 of 2 record checks met · 7 do not apply

met: Registry entry is active and says how to run it
not met: Source repository link opens
not applicable: Repository is not archived
not applicable: Code pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our check
not applicable: Repository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)
not applicable: Package names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifier
not applicable: The version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawn
not applicable: npm package carries build provenance (attestation)
not applicable: No known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependencies

Not ranked by downloads: a remote server publishes no download figure
Not ranked by stars: no public GitHub repository

From public records, not a safety rating. Each check with its reason · Is it safe to install?

Key facts

Runs: remote (hosted by the publisher)
Transport: streamable HTTP
Sign-in: none needed to open a session
Tools: 24
Described as changing data: 4 of 24 toolsAI-classified
Topic: securityAI-classified
Last tested: 2026-10-23

Add to your client

Worth knowing before you connect it

4 tools are described as changing something (sign_up, issue_rights_receipt, issue_rights_manifest, …): our AI model's reading of the descriptions, not something we tested, and the server opened a session without any credential. We did not call them.

Each line comes from a section below, with its source and date.

How fresh this is

Live-tested

yes, a real session (not a text-only review)

Last tested

2026-10-23

Mode

read-only (no tool calls)

Latest version

0.5.1, published 2026-10-19 (registry, as of the 2026-10-23 snapshot)

First listed version

2026-10-12 (earliest version still in the registry; older removed versions would be earlier)

Version history

2 versions listed, 2026-10-12 to 2026-10-19; 2 in the 90 days before the 2026-10-23 snapshot.

Most recent 2 versions

0.5.1 · 2026-10-19
0.5.0 · 2026-10-12

(versions still listed in the registry only)

Registry data

snapshot 2026-10-23

Package and repository

checked 2026-10-22

Engine

mcp-runtime-engine@0.1.0 · sdk@1.32.0

Changes since the last refresh

New in the registry: not in the list of 2026-10-04, listed on 2026-10-23 with version 0.5.1 (published 2026-10-19).

Source: the official MCP Registry list on 2026-10-04 and on 2026-10-23.

What it is

What does this server offer?

Observed inventory

24tools

3resources

0prompts

4 of 24 tools are described as changing something (creating, editing, deleting, sending or running).

start_hereon 15 other serversreads or searches
“Call first if you are new to Rightshold.”
Publisher declares: read-only no · destructive no · idempotent no · open-world no
3 inputs
- licensestring“Optional: an SPDX id to check right away, e.g.”
- usestring“Optional: the use to check the license for (default commercial_use)”
- questionstring“Optional: a rights question in plain English, answered in the same call”
read_ai_policyreads or searches
“Call before crawling, quoting or training on content from a website.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world yes
2 inputs, 1 required
- domainstringrequired“Host name such as example.com (a URL is accepted)”
- pathstring“Optional path to check, default /”
license_compatibility
“Call before shipping one product that bundles code, data, fonts or media under different licenses.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
2 inputs, 1 required
- licensesarrayrequired“SPDX ids”
- intended_useobject“Uses to check: each true flag must be documented; omitted = false; unknown fields refused.”
attribution_stringgenerates content
“Call when you reuse material that requires credit.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
5 inputs, 1 required
- licensestringrequired“SPDX id”
- titlestring“Work title”
- authorstring“Creator”
- source_urlstring“Where it came from”
- changesstring or boolean“What you changed”
ask_rightsholdreads or searches
“Call when you have a rights or licensing question in plain English, such as 'Can I use CC BY-NC 4.0 images in a paid ad campaign?'.”
Publisher declares: read-only no · destructive no · idempotent no · open-world no
3 inputs, 1 required
- questionstringrequired“Plain-language rights question”
- resource_idstring“Optional: pin a registered resource instead of letting the interpreter match one.”
- intended_useobject“Uses to check: each true flag must be documented; omitted = false; unknown fields refused.”
check_licenseon 4 other serversreads or searches
“Call before using any image, text, dataset, code, font or model you did not create.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world yes
3 inputs, 1 required
- licensestring“SPDX id, e.g.”
- source_urlstring“Instead of license: a page on GitHub, Hugging Face, npm, PyPI, Wikimedia Commons, Unsplash or Pexels; the license it declares is checked”
- intended_useobjectrequired“Uses to check: each true flag must be documented; omitted = false; unknown fields refused.”
assess_resource_for_usereads or searches
“Deterministic rights assessment bound to the exact resource version, license and intended use, and to whether the publisher's rights authority is documented (a verified domain hosting the resource).”
Publisher declares: read-only no · destructive no · idempotent no · open-world no
2 inputs, 2 required
- resource_idstringrequired“Registered resource id”
- intended_useobjectrequired“Uses to check: each true flag must be documented; omitted = false; unknown fields refused.”
check_rights_batchreads or searches
“Call before shipping anything that bundles third-party assets.”
Publisher declares: read-only no · destructive no · idempotent no · open-world yes
2 inputs, 1 required
- intended_useobject“Uses to check: each true flag must be documented; omitted = false; unknown fields refused.”
- itemsarrayrequired
verify_rights_manifestreads or searches
“Check a rights manifest's signature against Rightshold's issuer keys and confirm its hash was recorded on the ledger; with deliverable_sha256, also that it covers those exact bytes.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
3 inputs, 2 required
- manifestobjectrequired“Manifest as issued”
- signaturestringrequired“Its signature”
- deliverable_sha256string“Optional: the SHA-256 of the deliverable you received”
sign_upon 12 other serverscreates or changes datadescribed as changing data
“Use when your principal wants a Rightshold account: one call creates it and a free API key (shown once), email optional.”
Publisher declares: read-only no · destructive no · idempotent no · open-world yes
6 inputs, 1 required
- display_namestring“Account name”
- emailstring“Optional”
- kindstring
- sandboxboolean“If true, issue an rs_test_ sandbox key isolated from live stats and the live ledger.”
- accept_termsbooleanrequired“Must be true.”
- agentobject“Optional: create this agent in the same call.”
get_pricingon 192 other serversreads or searches
“Use this to see what Rightshold costs before you sign up or plan spend: every pricing line with its price today (0 during the preview), the planned price after the preview, its unit and free allowanc…”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
Takes no inputs.
get_statuson 93 other serversreads or searches
“Use this to check whether Rightshold is operational before you depend on it, and to cite its record: the current component checks (ledger chain, sealing, Bitcoin anchoring, webhooks, storage), ledger…”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
Takes no inputs.

Show 12 more tools

registry_lookupon 4 other serversreads or searches
“Call before trusting, paying or hiring an agent you have not worked with.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
2 inputs, 1 required
- querystringrequired“RS number, handle or name”
- historyboolean“Include ledger history”
ledger_verifyon 3 other servers
“Recompute every payload hash, leaf hash, Merkle root, block hash, chain link and signature.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
Takes no inputs.
issue_rights_receiptcreates or changes datadescribed as changing data
“Use when your principal wants signed proof that one asset you ship was cleared: a Rights Receipt (open standard rights-receipt/1) binding the file's SHA-256 to its license, intended use, verdict and …”
Publisher declares: read-only no · destructive no · idempotent no · open-world no
9 inputs, 1 required
- idempotency_keystring“Optional: a retry with the same key returns the first proof.”
- assetobjectrequired“The file”
- licensestring“SPDX id”
- resource_idstring
- intended_useobject“Same shape as check_license”
- agentstring
- attributionobject
- ttl_daysinteger
- api_keystring“Deprecated: use Authorization: Bearer <key> (arguments can reach transcripts).”
gate_checkon 4 other serversreads or searches
“Free.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world yes
8 inputs
- policyobject“Gate policy”
- kya_tokenstring“Agent RS-KYA token”
- agentstring“Or RS number/handle”
- receiptobject“Rights Receipt”
- asset_sha256string“Uploaded file hash”
- clearancestring
- intent_tokenstring
- requestobject“The signed request {method, url, headers} as received: its Web Bot Auth signature, and the intent token's key binding.”
issue_rights_manifestcreates or changes datadescribed as changing data
“Use when your principal wants signed proof for a whole deliverable: checks every third-party input (resource_id, license or asset) for its use, reusing licenses you hold, and returns a signed, ledger…”
Publisher declares: read-only no · destructive no · idempotent no · open-world no
7 inputs, 2 required
- idempotency_keystring“Optional: a retry with the same key returns the first proof.”
- titlestringrequired
- clientstring
- deliverableobject
- intended_useobject“Uses to check: each true flag must be documented; omitted = false; unknown fields refused.”
- itemsarrayrequired
- api_keystring“Deprecated: use Authorization: Bearer <key> (arguments can reach transcripts).”
kya_lookupreads or searches
“An agent's RS-KYA level (L0 declared, L1 key-bound, L2 operator-verified), status, the verified facts behind it (key, operator contact, attestation, DNS domain, registration, bureau record) and what …”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
2 inputs, 1 required
- agentstringrequired“Registration number (RS-XXXX-XXXX), handle or agent id”
- credentialboolean“Return the signed credential”
kya_verifyon 2 other serversreads or searches
“Verify a kya+jwt token or a signed RightsholdKYACredential: issuer signature, expiry, and the agent's live level and status (a credential is no longer valid once the level drops, the key changes or t…”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
3 inputs
- tokenstring“RS-KYA token”
- credentialobject“Or a credential”
- signaturestring“Credential signature”
kya_checkon 1 other serverreads or searches
“Allow or deny an agent against a relying-party policy, evaluated on the live record: min_level, require_active (default true), min_grade, max_open_complaints, require_classes, require_domain, min_ten…”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
2 inputs, 2 required
- agentstringrequired
- policyobjectrequired
submit_feedbackon 138 other serversdescribed as changing data
“Tell the Rightshold team what is missing, broken or worth more: the part it is about, satisfaction 1-5, optional ease 1-5, optional free text, optional contact.”
Publisher declares: read-only no · destructive no · idempotent no · open-world no
6 inputs, 2 required
- topicstringrequired
- satisfactionintegerrequired“1-5”
- easeinteger
- what_would_improvestring“Free text”
- contactstring“Optional reply address”
- kindstring“Defaults to agent.”
search_storeon 1 other serverreads or searches
“List published apps and skills in the Rightshold Store: for each, the vetting tier, the publisher and their live KYA level, declared permissions and the rating aggregate (ratings come only from KYA-v…”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
2 inputs
- typestring
- querystring“Search text”
check_listingon 12 other serversreads or searches
“Pre-install check against the Rightshold Store and its signed revocation list: give a package hash (SHA-256), an endpoint or package URL, or a store slug.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
3 inputs
- hashstring“SHA-256 of the package”
- urlstring“Listing or repo URL”
- slugstring“Store slug”
list_toolsetson 4 other serversreads or searches
“The toolsets this server offers and the tools in each.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no
Takes no inputs.

Each quoted sentence is the first sentence of the publisher’s own description. The kind of tool and the “changes data” mark are our AI model’s reading of that description, not something we tested: two differently worded runs had to agree, otherwise no label is shown, and nobody has checked them by hand. A tool without the “changes data” mark is described as only reading, searching or calculating, or the two runs did not agree. No tool was called. Read the publisher’s full description before relying on it. “Publisher declares” lists the hints the server itself sends with the tool (MCP annotations: read-only, destructive, idempotent, open-world); they are the publisher's claims, not checked by us. Inputs are the parameters in the tool's own input schema: name, declared type, whether it is required, and the first sentence of its description. Read 2026-10-23.

How well are its tools described?

Features #4 and #5

How clearly this server's own tool descriptions say what a tool does, and how consistent its tool list is. The first part is an AI model's yes/no reading of each description; the second part is counted. We do not turn it into a grade.

Descriptions

AI reading of each description

Says what the tool does: 100% of 24 tools
Says what it returns: 91% of 23 tools
States limits, defaults or errors: 0% of 21 tools
Says when to use it: 100% of 24 tools
Items covered per tool: 3.0 of 4 on average

Counted from the listing

Parameters with a description: 77% of 75
Tools with a description: 100% of 24
Typical description length: 358 characters

The tool set

Counted from the listing

Tools: 24
Size of the list: about 7,410 tokens for an agent to load (characters ÷ 4)
Naming: 24 of 24 names use snake_case

AI reading: easy to mix up

No pair found.

The AI items cover 24 of 24 tools: for a tool where two differently worded runs disagreed, that item is left out. They were not checked by hand, and no tool was called. “Easy to mix up” means two tools whose names or descriptions overlap without saying how they differ; the AI found none. We do not rate whether the tool set is complete or whether side effects are spelled out, because our AI reading of those was not reliable enough.

How do I add it to my client?

Config from the registry entry

From the remote endpoint (Streamable HTTP)

We connected to this URL on 2026-10-23 (a read-only session: no tool was called).

Add to CursorAn install link in the format Cursor documents, holding the Cursor config below.

Claude Desktop or claude.ai

Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector, then paste:
https://www.rightshold.com/mcp

Cursor · .cursor/mcp.json in a project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "rightshold": {
      "url": "https://www.rightshold.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

VS Code · .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "rightshold": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://www.rightshold.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

VS Code (command line) · Bash or zsh terminal (macOS, Linux)

code --add-mcp '{"name":"rightshold","type":"http","url":"https://www.rightshold.com/mcp"}'

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http rightshold https://www.rightshold.com/mcp

Try it in the MCP Inspector · runs on your machine, opens in your browser · Node 22.19+

npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector@2.11.0 --server-url https://www.rightshold.com/mcp --transport http

Optional settings the entry also lists (left out above): Authorization.
The server runs on the operator's infrastructure; it may ask you to sign in when you first connect.
The MCP Inspector lists the server's tools, resources and prompts; a tool you call there runs for real.

Built from the server's registry entry with each client's documented format (checked 2026-10-14; the Cursor link and the VS Code command 2026-10-19; the MCP Inspector command 2026-10-21). Values in < > are yours to fill in; this page never contains a key. Where the server needs a setting the entry does not declare, it can still fail to start.

Does the registry listing match what we found?

Feature #6

The registry verifies a package once, when it is published, and does not re-check it. A difference below is about the listing, not a judgement of the publisher.

Registry says	We found	Result	Source · date
Remote endpoint www.rightshold.com/mcp	Session opened	matches	our test · 2026-10-23
No credential declared as required	Opened a session without any credential	matches	our test · 2026-10-23

Choosing

Record checks

Public records · not a safety rating

1 of 2 record checks met · 7 do not apply

Not ranked by downloads: a remote server publishes no download figure
Not ranked by stars: no public GitHub repository

MetRegistry entry is active and says how to run itActive, with a package or a remote address.
Not metSource repository link opensThe registry entry gives no repository link.
Does not applyRepository is not archivedNo public GitHub repository to read.
Does not applyCode pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our checkNo public GitHub repository to read.
Does not applyRepository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)No public GitHub repository to read.
Does not applyPackage names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifierRemote server: it ships no package.
Does not applyThe version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawnRemote server: it ships no package.
Does not applynpm package carries build provenance (attestation)Remote server: it ships no package.
Does not applyNo known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependenciesRemote server: it ships no package.

Read from public records only: the registry entry, npm/PyPI, GitHub and advisory databases, checked 2026-10-22. No tool was called. Only “met” and “not met” are counted, so the total differs between servers; a check that does not apply or that we could not run is listed, never counted against it. It is not a safety rating. How each check works · Leaderboards

Common questions about com.rightshold/rightshold

Answered from the data above

Is com.rightshold/rightshold safe to install?

We do not rate servers as safe or unsafe. 1 of its 2 applicable record checks are met (facts from public records, each listed on this page). What the records show: 4 of its tools describe changing data (our AI model's reading of the descriptions). These are facts with their sources on this page, not a safety guarantee, and we did not run its tools.

Does com.rightshold/rightshold need an API key or sign-in?

It opened a session without any credential on 2026-10-23. The registry entry declares no required credential; no declaration is not a guarantee.

Has com.rightshold/rightshold been security tested?

Partly. 3 of the 14 checks that apply to it were exercised. We connected and read what the server declares, but did not call its tools: ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes. This is our choice, not a block by the server. No security verdict is published before verification.

What can com.rightshold/rightshold do?

It lists 24 tools. In our AI model's reading of their descriptions (two runs had to agree, nobody checked it by hand), they include tools that read or search, create or change data and generate content. We did not call any tool, so this describes the text, not the behaviour.

Can com.rightshold/rightshold change or delete data?

4 of its tools say in their description that they create, edit, delete, send or run something (our AI model's reading). We did not call any tool, so we cannot say what actually happens.

Found this page useful?

Anonymous · no sign-in

A quick, anonymous reaction — no account, no email. One per kind from your browser. The tally updates when the page is next refreshed, and it is only a rough count, never a safety rating or a measured number of people.

Similar servers

Same topic · AI-read

io.snyk/mcpalso has tools that creates or changes data, generates content, reads or searchescompare with this one
io.github.operantlabs/operant-mcpalso has tools that creates or changes data, generates content, reads or searchescompare with this one
io.github.CakeRepository/1passwordalso has tools that creates or changes data, generates content, reads or searchescompare with this one
io.github.ashlrai/phantom-secrets-mcpPhantom Secretsalso has tools that creates or changes data, generates content, reads or searchescompare with this one
io.github.ark-forge/mcp-eu-ai-actalso has tools that creates or changes data, generates content, reads or searchescompare with this one
io.github.tomjwxf/scopeblind-mcpalso has tools that creates or changes data, generates content, reads or searchescompare with this one

Active servers whose topic is also “security” and that have at least one tool of the same kind; most kinds in common first, then most GitHub stars. The topic and the tool kinds are an AI model's reading of the publishers' descriptions, not checked by hand. Similar is not a recommendation.

Compare with another server

Side by side: registry entry, our read-only session, the tools and the 18 classification fields. Same values as each page; no score.

Security testing

What did we test, and what did we leave out?

18 checks · features #1, #2

Not probed (we call no server's tools)

We connected and read what the server declares, but did not call its tools: ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes. This is our choice, not a block by the server. No security score is given; a check we did not run is never counted as passed.

The 18 checks at a glanceour test · 2026-10-23

Inventory: exercised
Hidden instructions: exercised
Real execution: not run · our policy
Secret leak: not run · nothing to check it against
Internal addresses: not run · our policy
Unconfirmed changes: not run · our policy
Bad input: not run · our policy
Model requests: not run · nothing to check it against
Sensitive questions: not run · nothing to check it against
Folder boundary: not run · our policy
Log leaks: not run · nothing to check it against
Hidden content: exercised
Fake assistant turns: not applicable
Token passthrough: not applicable
Token audience: not applicable
Sign-in redirect: not run · our policy
Consent handling: not testable from outside
Sign-in metadata: not applicable

3 exercised11 not run (reason given)4 not applicable

Each check ends in exactly one state: exercised, not run (with the reason), or not applicable (with the reason). 3 of the 14 checks that apply to it were exercised. We do not publish security-check outcomes for named servers.

Exercised · 3

1Inventory
tool-listReads the declared tools, resources and prompts.exercised
2Hidden instructions
description-poisoningLooks for hidden instructions in tool descriptions.exercised
12Hidden content
audience-hidingChecks resources that hide content from the user.exercised

Not run, with the reason · 11

3Real execution
real-executionCalls a tool and checks what really happens.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy
4Secret leak
canary-leakPlants a fake secret and checks whether it leaks.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against
5Internal addresses
ssrfChecks whether a tool can be steered to internal addresses.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy
6Unconfirmed changes
write-without-confirmationChecks whether tools that change data act without asking.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy
7Bad input
error-handlingSends bad input and watches how the server answers.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy
8Model requests
samplingChecks whether the server asks the client's model to act for it.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against
9Sensitive questions
elicitation-sensitive-dataChecks whether the server asks users for sensitive data.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against
10Folder boundary
root-boundaryChecks whether the server reaches outside the folders it was given.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy
11Log leaks
logging-side-channelChecks whether log messages carry data they should not.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against
16Sign-in redirect
open-redirectChecks the sign-in redirect for abuse.Testing the sign-in redirect means sending probes to the operator's sign-in service, which we do not do.not run · our policy
17Consent handling
confused-deputyChecks consent handling when one service acts for another.Depends on the operator's own consent screen, which differs per server and cannot be tested from outside.not testable from outside

Does not apply to this server · 4

13Fake assistant turns
fake-assistant-turnChecks prompts that pose as the assistant's own words.The server exposes no prompts.not applicable
14Token passthrough
token-passthroughChecks whether the server forwards a user's token to other services.The server opened a session without sign-in, so there is no token flow to check.not applicable
15Token audience
token-audience-validationChecks whether tokens meant for another service are accepted.The server opened a session without sign-in, so there is no token flow to check.not applicable
18Sign-in metadata
oauth-url-schemeChecks the published sign-in metadata for unsafe URLs.No sign-in (OAuth) metadata is published, so there are no sign-in addresses to check.not applicable

Source: our own test, 2026-10-23, mcp-runtime-engine@0.1.0. Which checks count and why follows our published scoring model.

What happened during the test?

Feature #8

The steps in order, as the test record holds them.

0 msStarted a read-only session with the server's remote endpoint
939 msConnected after 0 redirects. No credential was sent or needed.
Read the inventory: 24 tools, 3 resources, 0 prompts.
5,068 msFinished: 3 checks exercised.

Reference

How is it classified?

18 fields

One value per field, each with its source. Fields written by AI models are marked. A field with no value says why.

TopicAI-classified

security

AI-classified · 2026-10-23

Pricing modelAI-classified

no value

No value: the AI answer was held back because the quoted text did not clearly support it.

Programming language

does not apply

no existing GitHub repository (server declares no repository link, so there is nothing to fetch)

Hosting type

remote (hosted by the publisher)

registry · 2026-10-23

MCP capability

resources, tools

our test · 2026-10-23

Transport

streamable HTTP

registry · 2026-10-23

Required credentials

none declared

registry · no declaration is not a guarantee

Package registry

does not apply

remote-only server: no package is shipped, so there is no package registry

Freshness

0–30 days

registry updatedAt · 2026-10-23

Lifecycle status

active

registry · 2026-10-23

License class

does not apply

remote-only server: ships no package, so there is nothing to look up in a package registry

Integrity hash

does not apply

remote-only server: ships no package, so there is nothing to look up in a package registry

Signature / provenance

does not apply

remote-only server: ships no package, so there is nothing to look up in a package registry

Dependency advisories

does not apply

ships no package, so there are no dependencies to audit

Popularity

does not apply

remote-only server: ships no package, so there is nothing to look up in a package registry

Publisher signals

not stated

no readable GitHub owner to describe

Maintenance

does not apply

server declares no repository link, so there is nothing to fetch

Environment

the publisher's infrastructure

where it runs, from the hosting type

“Not stated” means the source did not state it; “does not apply” means it does not apply to this kind of server; “our limit” means our own lookup failed. A linked value opens the directory filtered to the same value.

Cite or correct this page

Sources and corrections

Suggested citation

ProtocolProbe. “com.rightshold/rightshold: MCP server record.” Data checked 2026-10-23. https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/com.rightshold/rightshold

Figures are valid for the date shown. Our facts on this page are CC BY 4.0: reuse them with a link and the check date. Quoted text (the publisher’s descriptions, website quotes, tool names) is not ours to license.

As JSON: this record in the API · API documentation.

Badge for your README

[![ProtocolProbe](https://protocolprobe.com/api/v1/badge/com.rightshold/rightshold)](https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/com.rightshold/rightshold)

It shows this server's record-check count: facts from public records, no tool called. It is not a security rating or a pass. It links here and updates after each data reload.

Something wrong, or is this yours?

If a fact here is wrong, tell us and we will re-check it. If you operate this server, you can run our checks on it yourself with the free self-test command; we call no server’s tools ourselves for anything shown here.

Write to hello@protocolprobe.com · corrections log · methodology