MCP servers › fun.pumpdata › pumpdata
MCP server · registry snapshot 2026-10-23 · last tested 2026-10-23
fun.pumpdata/pumpdata
Check a pump.fun coin, dev or wallet: deployer record, bundle, PnL. Every pump.fun trade, ever. — the publisher's description
Summary
fun.pumpdata/pumpdata is a remote MCP server listed in the official MCP registry at version 0.3.2. On 2026-10-23 ProtocolProbe connected to it in read-only mode and read its inventory: 9 tools, 0 resources and 0 prompts.
Record checks
4 of 5 record checks met · 4 do not apply
- met: Registry entry is active and says how to run it
- met: Source repository link opens
- met: Repository is not archived
- met: Code pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our check
- not met: Repository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)
- not applicable: Package names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifier
- not applicable: The version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawn
- not applicable: npm package carries build provenance (attestation)
- not applicable: No known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependencies
- Not ranked by downloads: a remote server publishes no download figure
- Not ranked by stars: 0 stars (ranked from 10)
From public records, not a safety rating. Each check with its reason · Is it safe to install?
Key facts
- Runs
- remote (hosted by the publisher)
- Transport
- streamable HTTP
- Sign-in
- none needed to open a session
- Repository
- public
- Tools
- 9
- Described as changing data
- 1 of 9 toolsAI-classified
- Topic
- finance-and-paymentsAI-classified
- Pricing
- usage-basedAI-classified
- Last tested
- 2026-10-23
Worth knowing before you connect it
- 1 tool is described as changing something (replay): our AI model's reading of the descriptions, not something we tested, and the server opened a session without any credential. We did not call it.
Each line comes from a section below, with its source and date.
How fresh this is
- Live-tested
- yes, a real session (not a text-only review)
- Last tested
- 2026-10-23
- Mode
- read-only (no tool calls)
- Latest version
- 0.3.2, published 2026-10-21 (registry, as of the 2026-10-23 snapshot)
- First listed version
- 2026-10-17 (earliest version still in the registry; older removed versions would be earlier)
- Version history
- 3 versions listed, 2026-10-17 to 2026-10-21; 3 in the 90 days before the 2026-10-23 snapshot.(versions still listed in the registry only)
Most recent 3 versions
0.3.2· 2026-10-210.3.1· 2026-10-170.3.0· 2026-10-17
- Registry data
- snapshot 2026-10-23
- Package and repository
- checked 2026-10-22
- Engine
- mcp-runtime-engine@0.1.0 · sdk@1.32.0
Changes since the last refresh
New in the registry: not in the list of 2026-10-04, listed on 2026-10-23 with version 0.3.2 (published 2026-10-21).
Source: the official MCP Registry list on 2026-10-04 and on 2026-10-23.
What it is
What does this server offer?
Observed inventory1 of 9 tools are described as changing something (creating, editing, deleting, sending or running).
“Pump.fun stats for one UTC day, free: coins launched and graduated, the graduation rate, SOL and USD volume, traders; the top coins by peak market cap and by volume; the deployers whose coins did bes…”
1 input
daystring“a UTC day, YYYY-MM-DD; default the latest”
- find_coinreads or searches
“Free.”
2 inputs, 1 required
qstringrequired“a ticker ($KIMCHI or KIMCHI), a name, or a mint”limitinteger“coins to return, newest first; default 20”
“The odds for pump.fun coins in a market-cap band: how many first traded inside the band in a window, how many of those then reached 2x, 5x, 10x and 20x within 3 h, and the median peak.”
5 inputs, 3 required
bandstringrequired“market-cap band in USD, e.g.”fromstringrequired“window start, ISO 8601 UTC”tostringrequired“window end; a crossing needs its 3 h after, so an end under 3 h before the data's as-of is cut”venuestring“default any”paymentstring“the x402 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE value for this exact call (USDC on Solana).”
- wallet_recordsreads or searches
“Check pump.fun wallets by address: what each has been since day one, its class by rule (winner: took out 10+ SOL and 1% more than it put in over 20+ coin-weeks; net_loser: put in 50+ SOL more than it…”
3 inputs, 1 required
addressesarrayrequired“base58 wallet addresses”mintstring“optional: the coin they are buying; a wallet with no record before its creation is 'new'”paymentstring“the x402 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE value for this exact call (USDC on Solana).”
“Check a pump.fun coin by its mint (the contract address, CA): who launched it and the deployer's record at the launch (launches before it, graduations, the gap to the previous one, launches in the la…”
2 inputs, 1 required
mintstringrequired“the coin's mint address (base58)”paymentstring“the x402 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE value for this exact call (USDC on Solana).”
- deployer_recordreads or searches
“A pump.fun dev's record by wallet address, no coin needed: launches, graduations, best run, the gap between launches; over the last 90 days how many of its launches doubled, did 10x, held at 2x a day…”
2 inputs, 1 required
addressstringrequired“the deployer's wallet address (base58)”paymentstring“the x402 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE value for this exact call (USDC on Solana).”
- similar_launchesreads or searches
“The pump.fun launches most like this coin at the same age, named by mint, and how each went over its next 24 h (peak, close, dead or graduated): the same deployer's prior launches first, then the nea…”
3 inputs, 1 required
mintstringrequired“the coin's mint address (base58)”limitinteger“comparables to return, default 10”paymentstring“the x402 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE value for this exact call (USDC on Solana).”
“Backtest pump.fun picks: picks with timestamps and sizes in; what they made, pick by pick and in sum, every pick counted, the dead ones included, filled at the PumpSwap pool as it stood after your la…”
5 inputs, 1 required
picksarrayrequired“up to 500 a run for now; split the rest into another run”latency_snumber“seconds from the decision to the fill”bankroll_solnumber“SOL at risk at once; a pick with no room is skipped”exitobject“take (x the entry), trail (share off the high), hold_s (seconds); any combination”paymentstring“the x402 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE value for this exact call (USDC on Solana).”
- replay_resultreads or searches
“A replay's result: the job's state, and the replay once done with the execution model it charged.”
1 input, 1 required
idstringrequired“the id from replay”
Each quoted sentence is the first sentence of the publisher’s own description. The kind of tool and the “changes data” mark are our AI model’s reading of that description, not something we tested: two differently worded runs had to agree, otherwise no label is shown, and nobody has checked them by hand. A tool without the “changes data” mark is described as only reading, searching or calculating, or the two runs did not agree. No tool was called. Read the publisher’s full description before relying on it. Inputs are the parameters in the tool's own input schema: name, declared type, whether it is required, and the first sentence of its description. Read 2026-10-23.
How well are its tools described?
Features #4 and #5
How clearly this server's own tool descriptions say what a tool does, and how consistent its tool list is. The first part is an AI model's yes/no reading of each description; the second part is counted. We do not turn it into a grade.
Descriptions
AI reading of each description
- Says what the tool does
- 100% of 9 tools
- Says what it returns
- 100% of 9 tools
- States limits, defaults or errors
- 75% of 4 tools
- Says when to use it
- 100% of 9 tools
- Items covered per tool
- 3.9 of 4 on average
Counted from the listing
- Parameters with a description
- 100% of 24
- Tools with a description
- 100% of 9
- Typical description length
- 567 characters
The tool set
Counted from the listing
- Tools
- 9
- Size of the list
- about 2,458 tokens for an agent to load (characters ÷ 4)
- Naming
- 7 of 9 names use snake_case
AI reading: easy to mix up
No pair found.
The AI items cover 9 of 9 tools: for a tool where two differently worded runs disagreed, that item is left out. They were not checked by hand, and no tool was called. “Easy to mix up” means two tools whose names or descriptions overlap without saying how they differ; the AI found none. We do not rate whether the tool set is complete or whether side effects are spelled out, because our AI reading of those was not reliable enough.
How do I add it to my client?
Config from the registry entry
From the remote endpoint (Streamable HTTP)
We connected to this URL on 2026-10-23 (a read-only session: no tool was called).
Add to CursorAn install link in the format Cursor documents, holding the Cursor config below.
Claude Desktop or claude.ai
Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector, then paste: https://pumpdata.fun/mcp
Cursor · .cursor/mcp.json in a project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"pumpdata": {
"url": "https://pumpdata.fun/mcp"
}
}
}VS Code · .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"pumpdata": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://pumpdata.fun/mcp"
}
}
}VS Code (command line) · Bash or zsh terminal (macOS, Linux)
code --add-mcp '{"name":"pumpdata","type":"http","url":"https://pumpdata.fun/mcp"}'Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http pumpdata https://pumpdata.fun/mcp
Try it in the MCP Inspector · runs on your machine, opens in your browser · Node 22.19+
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector@2.11.0 --server-url https://pumpdata.fun/mcp --transport http
- The server runs on the operator's infrastructure; it may ask you to sign in when you first connect.
- The MCP Inspector lists the server's tools, resources and prompts; a tool you call there runs for real.
Built from the server's registry entry with each client's documented format (checked 2026-10-14; the Cursor link and the VS Code command 2026-10-19; the MCP Inspector command 2026-10-21). Values in < > are yours to fill in; this page never contains a key. Where the server needs a setting the entry does not declare, it can still fail to start.
Does the registry listing match what we found?
Feature #6The registry verifies a package once, when it is published, and does not re-check it. A difference below is about the listing, not a judgement of the publisher.
| Registry says | We found | Result | Source · date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remote endpoint pumpdata.fun/mcp | Session opened | matches | our test · 2026-10-23 |
| No credential declared as required | Opened a session without any credential | matches | our test · 2026-10-23 |
| Repository github.com/pumpdatafun/pumpdata-examples | Opens publicly | matches | api.github.com · 2026-10-22 |
Who made it?
Feature #7 · lineage
Facts about the publisher. We do not turn them into a trust score.
- Namespace
- fun.pumpdata
- GitHub owner
- an organization (pumpdatafun)
- Repository
- github.com/pumpdatafun/pumpdata-examples
- Stars
- 0
- Repository age
- 0–30 days
- Last push
- 0–30 days ago
- Archived
- no
- Security policy
- none found (we looked for SECURITY.md in the repository and in its owner’s .github repository)
Source: the registry entry and api.github.com · 2026-10-22; security policy read from GitHub · 2026-10-23.
Publish this server? Run these checks against it yourself before release, from your own machine: a server the command starts, or your own server at its URL after a one-time proof that you control it: npx protocolprobe-selftest.
Choosing
Record checks
Public records · not a safety rating4 of 5 record checks met · 4 do not apply
- Not ranked by downloads: a remote server publishes no download figure
- Not ranked by stars: 0 stars (ranked from 10)
- MetRegistry entry is active and says how to run itActive, with a package or a remote address.
- MetSource repository link opensThe linked GitHub repository is public.
- MetRepository is not archivedNot archived.
- MetCode pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our checkLast push 0-30 days before our check.
- Not metRepository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)No SECURITY.md in the places GitHub reads it from.
- Does not applyPackage names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifierRemote server: it ships no package.
- Does not applyThe version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawnRemote server: it ships no package.
- Does not applynpm package carries build provenance (attestation)Remote server: it ships no package.
- Does not applyNo known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependenciesRemote server: it ships no package.
Read from public records only: the registry entry, npm/PyPI, GitHub and advisory databases, checked 2026-10-22. No tool was called. Only “met” and “not met” are counted, so the total differs between servers; a check that does not apply or that we could not run is listed, never counted against it. It is not a safety rating. How each check works · Leaderboards
Common questions about fun.pumpdata/pumpdata
Answered from the data aboveIs fun.pumpdata/pumpdata safe to install?
We do not rate servers as safe or unsafe. 4 of its 5 applicable record checks are met (facts from public records, each listed on this page). What the records show: Its source repository opens publicly. Its repository had a push in the last 90 days. 1 of its tools describes changing data (our AI model's reading of the descriptions). These are facts with their sources on this page, not a safety guarantee, and we did not run its tools.
Is fun.pumpdata/pumpdata free to use?
Its website (pumpdata.fun/) describes a usage-based pricing model. This is an AI-classified reading of the page on 2026-10-23, so check the page itself before relying on it.
Does fun.pumpdata/pumpdata need an API key or sign-in?
It opened a session without any credential on 2026-10-23. The registry entry declares no required credential; no declaration is not a guarantee.
Has fun.pumpdata/pumpdata been security tested?
Partly. 2 of the 14 checks that apply to it were exercised. We connected and read what the server declares, but did not call its tools: ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes. This is our choice, not a block by the server. No security verdict is published before verification.
What can fun.pumpdata/pumpdata do?
It lists 9 tools. In our AI model's reading of their descriptions (two runs had to agree, nobody checked it by hand), they include tools that read or search. We did not call any tool, so this describes the text, not the behaviour.
Can fun.pumpdata/pumpdata change or delete data?
1 of its tools says in its description that it creates, edits, deletes, sends or runs something (our AI model's reading). We did not call any tool, so we cannot say what actually happens.
Does fun.pumpdata/pumpdata publish a security policy?
We found no SECURITY.md in its repository (root, .github/ or docs/) or in its owner's .github repository.
Where is the source code of fun.pumpdata/pumpdata?
In github.com/pumpdatafun/pumpdata-examples, which opens publicly.
Found this page useful?
Anonymous · no sign-inA quick, anonymous reaction — no account, no email. One per kind from your browser. The tally updates when the page is next refreshed, and it is only a rough count, never a safety rating or a measured number of people.
Similar servers
Same topic · AI-read
- io.github.vybenetwork/solana-mcp-vybeSolana MCP by Vybealso has tools that reads or searchescompare with this one
- io.github.mnemox-ai/tradememory-protocolalso has tools that reads or searchescompare with this one
- io.github.YichengYang-Ethan/oracle3Oracle3 prediction-market arbitrage checksalso has tools that reads or searchescompare with this one
- io.github.agent-next/polymarket-paper-traderPolymarket Paper Traderalso has tools that reads or searchescompare with this one
- io.github.openaccountants/openaccountantsOpenAccountantsalso has tools that reads or searchescompare with this one
- io.github.koreal6803/finlab-aialso has tools that reads or searchescompare with this one
Active servers whose topic is also “finance-and-payments” and that have at least one tool of the same kind; most kinds in common first, then most GitHub stars. The topic and the tool kinds are an AI model's reading of the publishers' descriptions, not checked by hand. Similar is not a recommendation.
Compare with another server
Side by side: registry entry, our read-only session, the tools and the 18 classification fields. Same values as each page; no score.
Security testing
What did we test, and what did we leave out?
18 checks · features #1, #2
Not probed (we call no server's tools)
We connected and read what the server declares, but did not call its tools: ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes. This is our choice, not a block by the server. No security score is given; a check we did not run is never counted as passed.
- Inventory: exercised
- Hidden instructions: exercised
- Real execution: not run · our policy
- Secret leak: not run · nothing to check it against
- Internal addresses: not run · our policy
- Unconfirmed changes: not run · our policy
- Bad input: not run · our policy
- Model requests: not run · nothing to check it against
- Sensitive questions: not run · nothing to check it against
- Folder boundary: not run · our policy
- Log leaks: not run · nothing to check it against
- Hidden content: not run · nothing to check it against
- Fake assistant turns: not applicable
- Token passthrough: not applicable
- Token audience: not applicable
- Sign-in redirect: not run · our policy
- Consent handling: not testable from outside
- Sign-in metadata: not applicable
2 exercised12 not run (reason given)4 not applicable
Each check ends in exactly one state: exercised, not run (with the reason), or not applicable (with the reason). 2 of the 14 checks that apply to it were exercised. We do not publish security-check outcomes for named servers.
- 1Inventory
tool-listReads the declared tools, resources and prompts.exercised - 2Hidden instructions
description-poisoningLooks for hidden instructions in tool descriptions.exercised
- 3Real execution
real-executionCalls a tool and checks what really happens.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy - 4Secret leak
canary-leakPlants a fake secret and checks whether it leaks.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against - 5Internal addresses
ssrfChecks whether a tool can be steered to internal addresses.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy - 6Unconfirmed changes
write-without-confirmationChecks whether tools that change data act without asking.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy - 7Bad input
error-handlingSends bad input and watches how the server answers.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy - 8Model requests
samplingChecks whether the server asks the client's model to act for it.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against - 9Sensitive questions
elicitation-sensitive-dataChecks whether the server asks users for sensitive data.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against - 10Folder boundary
root-boundaryChecks whether the server reaches outside the folders it was given.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy - 11Log leaks
logging-side-channelChecks whether log messages carry data they should not.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against - 12Hidden content
audience-hidingChecks resources that hide content from the user.This check needs content the server returns, and nothing was read or called.not run · nothing to check it against - 16Sign-in redirect
open-redirectChecks the sign-in redirect for abuse.Testing the sign-in redirect means sending probes to the operator's sign-in service, which we do not do.not run · our policy - 17Consent handling
confused-deputyChecks consent handling when one service acts for another.Depends on the operator's own consent screen, which differs per server and cannot be tested from outside.not testable from outside
- 13Fake assistant turns
fake-assistant-turnChecks prompts that pose as the assistant's own words.The server exposes no prompts.not applicable - 14Token passthrough
token-passthroughChecks whether the server forwards a user's token to other services.The server opened a session without sign-in, so there is no token flow to check.not applicable - 15Token audience
token-audience-validationChecks whether tokens meant for another service are accepted.The server opened a session without sign-in, so there is no token flow to check.not applicable - 18Sign-in metadata
oauth-url-schemeChecks the published sign-in metadata for unsafe URLs.No sign-in (OAuth) metadata is published, so there are no sign-in addresses to check.not applicable
Source: our own test, 2026-10-23, mcp-runtime-engine@0.1.0. Which checks count and why follows our published scoring model.
What happened during the test?
Feature #8
The steps in order, as the test record holds them.
- 0 msStarted a read-only session with the server's remote endpoint
- 229 msConnected after 0 redirects. No credential was sent or needed.
- Read the inventory: 9 tools, 0 resources, 0 prompts.
- 994 msFinished: 2 checks exercised.
Reference
How is it classified?
18 fields
One value per field, each with its source. Fields written by AI models are marked. A field with no value says why.
“Ask by the call: free to start (put /free in front: 300 lookups a day, no key), then half a cent a call, no account.”
“Not stated” means the source did not state it; “does not apply” means it does not apply to this kind of server; “our limit” means our own lookup failed. A linked value opens the directory filtered to the same value.
Cite or correct this page
Sources and corrections
Suggested citation
ProtocolProbe. “fun.pumpdata/pumpdata: MCP server record.” Data checked 2026-10-23. https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/fun.pumpdata/pumpdata
Figures are valid for the date shown. Our facts on this page are CC BY 4.0: reuse them with a link and the check date. Quoted text (the publisher’s descriptions, website quotes, tool names) is not ours to license.
As JSON: this record in the API · API documentation.
Badge for your README
[](https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/fun.pumpdata/pumpdata)
It shows this server's record-check count: facts from public records, no tool called. It is not a security rating or a pass. It links here and updates after each data reload.
Something wrong, or is this yours?
If a fact here is wrong, tell us and we will re-check it. If you operate this server, you can run our checks on it yourself with the free self-test command; we call no server’s tools ourselves for anything shown here.
Write to hello@protocolprobe.com · corrections log · methodology