MCP servers › info.astroway › chinese

MCP server · registry snapshot 2026-10-23

info.astroway/chinese

BaZi four pillars, Zi Wei Dou Shu, the Chinese calendar and feng shui. — the publisher's description

1 of 2 record checks metTopic: other · AI-classifiedversion 0.4.3streamable HTTP

Summary

info.astroway/chinese is a remote MCP server listed in the official MCP registry at version 0.4.3.

Record checks

1 of 2 record checks met · 7 do not apply

met: Registry entry is active and says how to run it
not met: Source repository link opens
not applicable: Repository is not archived
not applicable: Code pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our check
not applicable: Repository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)
not applicable: Package names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifier
not applicable: The version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawn
not applicable: npm package carries build provenance (attestation)
not applicable: No known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependencies

Not ranked by downloads: a remote server publishes no download figure
Not ranked by stars: no public GitHub repository

From public records, not a safety rating. Each check with its reason

Key facts

Runs: remote (hosted by the publisher)
Transport: streamable HTTP
Topic: otherAI-classified
Last tested: not tested

Add to your client

How fresh this is

Live-tested

Last tested

not tested

Latest version

0.4.3, published 2026-10-05 (registry, as of the 2026-10-23 snapshot)

First listed version

2026-10-05 (earliest version still in the registry; older removed versions would be earlier)

Version history

2 versions listed, all on 2026-10-05; 2 in the 90 days before the 2026-10-23 snapshot.

Most recent 2 versions

0.4.3 · 2026-10-05
0.4.2 · 2026-10-05

(versions still listed in the registry only)

Registry data

snapshot 2026-10-23

Package and repository

checked 2026-10-22

Changes since the last refresh

New in the registry: not in the list of 2026-10-04, listed on 2026-10-23 with version 0.4.3 (published 2026-10-05).

Source: the official MCP Registry list on 2026-10-04 and on 2026-10-23.

What it is

How do I add it to my client?

Config from the registry entry

From the remote endpoint (Streamable HTTP)

This entry needs values of your own (marked < > or { } in the config below), so there is no one-click link: paste the config and fill them in.

Claude Desktop or claude.ai

Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector, then paste:
https://mcp.astroway.info/mcp/chinese

The entry also requires the header Authorization.

Cursor · .cursor/mcp.json in a project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "chinese": {
      "url": "https://mcp.astroway.info/mcp/chinese",
      "headers": {
        "Authorization": "<Authorization>"
      }
    }
  }
}

VS Code · .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "chinese": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.astroway.info/mcp/chinese",
      "headers": {
        "Authorization": "${input:authorization}"
      }
    }
  },
  "inputs": [
    {
      "type": "promptString",
      "id": "authorization",
      "description": "Authorization",
      "password": true
    }
  ]
}

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http chinese https://mcp.astroway.info/mcp/chinese --header "Authorization: <Authorization>"

Try it in the MCP Inspector · runs on your machine, opens in your browser · Node 22.19+

npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector@2.11.0 --server-url https://mcp.astroway.info/mcp/chinese --transport http

Replace <Authorization> with your own header values; the entry marks Authorization as secret, so keep the file out of version control.
The server runs on the operator's infrastructure; it may ask you to sign in when you first connect.
The MCP Inspector lists the server's tools, resources and prompts; a tool you call there runs for real. The command above does not send the required header (Authorization).

Built from the server's registry entry with each client's documented format (checked 2026-10-14; the Cursor link and the VS Code command 2026-10-19; the MCP Inspector command 2026-10-21). Values in < > are yours to fill in; this page never contains a key. Where the server needs a setting the entry does not declare, it can still fail to start.

Choosing

Record checks

Public records · not a safety rating

1 of 2 record checks met · 7 do not apply

Not ranked by downloads: a remote server publishes no download figure
Not ranked by stars: no public GitHub repository

MetRegistry entry is active and says how to run itActive, with a package or a remote address.
Not metSource repository link opensThe registry entry gives no repository link.
Does not applyRepository is not archivedNo public GitHub repository to read.
Does not applyCode pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our checkNo public GitHub repository to read.
Does not applyRepository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)No public GitHub repository to read.
Does not applyPackage names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifierRemote server: it ships no package.
Does not applyThe version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawnRemote server: it ships no package.
Does not applynpm package carries build provenance (attestation)Remote server: it ships no package.
Does not applyNo known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependenciesRemote server: it ships no package.

Read from public records only: the registry entry, npm/PyPI, GitHub and advisory databases, checked 2026-10-22. No tool was called. Only “met” and “not met” are counted, so the total differs between servers; a check that does not apply or that we could not run is listed, never counted against it. It is not a safety rating. How each check works · Leaderboards

Common questions about info.astroway/chinese

Answered from the data above

Has info.astroway/chinese been security tested?

Not yet. It requires a credential (a key or token) that the publisher marks as required. We never fill in credentials, so we did not start it.

Found this page useful?

Anonymous · no sign-in

A quick, anonymous reaction — no account, no email. One per kind from your browser. The tally updates when the page is next refreshed, and it is only a rough count, never a safety rating or a measured number of people.

Similar servers

Same topic · AI-read

Active servers whose topic is also “other”, most GitHub stars first. The topic and the tool kinds are an AI model's reading of the publishers' descriptions, not checked by hand. Similar is not a recommendation.

Compare with another server

Side by side: registry entry, our read-only session, the tools and the 18 classification fields. Same values as each page; no score.

Security testing

Has it been tested?

Feature #1

It requires a credential (a key or token) that the publisher marks as required. We never fill in credentials, so we did not start it. — the server's own choice

Required input the publisher declares: Authorization (secret).

Reference

How is it classified?

18 fields

One value per field, each with its source. Fields written by AI models are marked. A field with no value says why.

TopicAI-classified

other

AI-classified · 2026-10-23

Pricing modelAI-classified

no value

No value: the AI answer was held back because the quoted text did not clearly support it.

Programming language

does not apply

no existing GitHub repository (server declares no repository link, so there is nothing to fetch)

Hosting type

remote (hosted by the publisher)

registry · 2026-10-23

MCP capability

not checked

not read (no session)

Transport

streamable HTTP

registry · 2026-10-23

Required credentials

requires a secret

registry · no declaration is not a guarantee

Package registry

does not apply

remote-only server: no package is shipped, so there is no package registry

Freshness

0–30 days

registry updatedAt · 2026-10-23

Lifecycle status

active

registry · 2026-10-23

License class

does not apply

remote-only server: ships no package, so there is nothing to look up in a package registry

Integrity hash

does not apply

remote-only server: ships no package, so there is nothing to look up in a package registry

Signature / provenance

does not apply

remote-only server: ships no package, so there is nothing to look up in a package registry

Dependency advisories

does not apply

ships no package, so there are no dependencies to audit

Popularity

does not apply

remote-only server: ships no package, so there is nothing to look up in a package registry

Publisher signals

not stated

no readable GitHub owner to describe

Maintenance

does not apply

server declares no repository link, so there is nothing to fetch

Environment

the publisher's infrastructure

where it runs, from the hosting type

“Not stated” means the source did not state it; “does not apply” means it does not apply to this kind of server; “our limit” means our own lookup failed. A linked value opens the directory filtered to the same value.

Cite or correct this page

Sources and corrections

Suggested citation

ProtocolProbe. “info.astroway/chinese: MCP server record.” Data checked 2026-10-22. https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/info.astroway/chinese

Figures are valid for the date shown. Our facts on this page are CC BY 4.0: reuse them with a link and the check date. Quoted text (the publisher’s descriptions, website quotes, tool names) is not ours to license.

As JSON: this record in the API · API documentation.

Badge for your README

[![ProtocolProbe](https://protocolprobe.com/api/v1/badge/info.astroway/chinese)](https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/info.astroway/chinese)

It shows this server's record-check count: facts from public records, no tool called. It is not a security rating or a pass. It links here and updates after each data reload.

Something wrong, or is this yours?

If a fact here is wrong, tell us and we will re-check it. If you operate this server, you can run our checks on it yourself with the free self-test command; we call no server’s tools ourselves for anything shown here.

Write to hello@protocolprobe.com · corrections log · methodology