Skip to content

MCP servers › io.github.koda-ai-studio › agent-bom

MCP server · registry snapshot 2026-10-23 · last tested 2026-10-23

io.github.koda-ai-studio/agent-bom

Scan AI/MCP dependencies, descriptor injection, risky tool inputs and authentication configuration. — the publisher's description

8 of 8 record checks metRead-only · tools listed 2026-10-23Topic: security · AI-classifiedversion 0.110.0PythonApache-2.0standard input/output8 tools

Summary

io.github.koda-ai-studio/agent-bom is a local MCP server listed in the official MCP registry at version 0.110.0. On 2026-10-23 ProtocolProbe started its published package in an isolated sandbox in read-only mode and read its inventory: 8 tools, 4 resources and 3 prompts.

Record checks

8 of 8 record checks met · 1 does not apply

  • met: Registry entry is active and says how to run it
  • met: Source repository link opens
  • met: Repository is not archived
  • met: Code pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our check
  • met: Repository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)
  • met: Package names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifier
  • met: The version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawn
  • not applicable: npm package carries build provenance (attestation)
  • met: No known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependencies
  • #768 of 15,112 packages by monthly downloads, tied with 2 others (package shared with 1 other registry entry)
  • #1,377 of 22,952 repositories by GitHub stars, tied with 34 others

From public records, not a safety rating. Each check with its reason · Is it safe to install?

Key facts

Runs
local package
Transport
standard input/output
Package
PyPI · listed version current
License
Apache-2.0
Dependencies
no known high or critical advisories
Repository
public
Tools
8
Described as changing data
0 of 8 toolsAI-classified
Topic
securityAI-classified
Last tested
2026-10-23

Add to your client

How fresh this is

Live-tested
yes, a real session (not a text-only review)
Last tested
2026-10-23
Mode
read-only (no tool calls)
Latest version
0.110.0, published 2026-10-22 (registry, as of the 2026-10-23 snapshot)
First listed version
2026-10-22 (earliest version still in the registry; older removed versions would be earlier)
Registry data
snapshot 2026-10-23
Package and repository
checked 2026-10-23
Engine
mcp-runtime-engine@0.1.0 · sdk@1.32.0

Changes since the last refresh

New in the registry: not in the list of 2026-10-04, listed on 2026-10-23 with version 0.110.0 (published 2026-10-22).

Source: the official MCP Registry list on 2026-10-04 and on 2026-10-23.

What it is

What does this server offer?

Observed inventory
8tools
4resources
3prompts

None of its 8 tools are described as changing anything. For 4 the reading was uncertain, so no mark is shown.

  • scanon 17 other serversreads or searches

    “Run a full AI supply chain security scan and return an AI-BOM.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world yes

    23 inputs
    • repo_urlstring or null“Public git repository URL to clone and scan, e.g.”
    • config_pathstring or null“Local directory to scan — a project root or an MCP client config directory.”
    • no_discoverboolean“Disable ambient host MCP-client discovery.”
    • imagestring or null“Docker image to scan (e.g.”
    • sbom_pathstring or null“Path to existing CycloneDX or SPDX JSON SBOM file to ingest.”
    • packagestring or null“Direct package or MCP launch command to scan, e.g.”
    • ecosystemstring or null“Ecosystem of ``package`` when the spec does not name a launcher: 'npm', 'pypi', 'go', 'cargo', 'maven', 'nuget', 'rubygems', 'composer', 'swift', 'pub', 'hex',…”
    • enrichboolean“Enable NVD CVSS, EPSS probability, and CISA KEV enrichment.”
    • offlineboolean or null“true: use the local vulnerability DB only and skip registry, OSV, GHSA, and NVIDIA network lookups (requires a populated DB from `agent-bom db update`).”
    • scorecardboolean“Enrich packages with OpenSSF Scorecard scores (requires resolvable GitHub repos).”
    • transitiveboolean“Resolve transitive dependencies for npx/uvx packages.”
    • verify_integrityboolean“Verify package SHA-256/SRI hashes and SLSA provenance against registries.”
    • fail_severitystring or null“Return failure status if vulns at this severity or higher: critical, high, medium, low.”
    • warn_severitystring or null“Return warning status (gate_status=warn, exit 0) when vulns at this severity or higher exist.”
    • auto_update_dbboolean“Explicitly refresh the local vuln DB when older than the daily freshness target before scanning.”
    • db_sourcesstring or null“Comma-separated DB sources to sync before scanning (e.g.”
    • output_formatstring“Output format: 'json' (default), 'sarif', 'cyclonedx', 'spdx', 'junit', 'csv', or 'markdown'.”
    • policyobject or null“Policy object to evaluate alongside scan results, e.g.”
    • detailstring“JSON output only.”
    • result_idstring or null“result_id from a previous scan response.”
    • sectionstring or null“Section of a stored result to page, e.g.”
    • offsetinteger“Zero-based item offset into `section`.”
    • limitinteger“Maximum items per page of `section` (1-200).”
  • checkon 33 other serversreads or searches

    “Check a specific package for known CVEs before installing.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world yes

    4 inputs, 1 required
    • packagestringrequired“Package name with optional version, e.g.”
    • ecosystemstring“Package ecosystem: 'npm', 'pypi', 'go', 'cargo', 'maven', 'nuget', 'rubygems', 'composer', 'swift', 'pub', 'hex', 'conda', 'deb', 'apk', or 'rpm'.”
    • versionstring or null“Optional package version when omitted from ``package`` (e.g.”
    • offlineboolean“Use only the local advisory database.”
  • intel_lookupon 1 other serverreads or searches

    “Look up one advisory from the local threat-intel database.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world yes

    1 input, 1 required
    • advisory_idstringrequired“CVE, GHSA, or OSV advisory ID, e.g.”
  • policy_checkon 6 other servers

    “Evaluate a security policy against current scan results.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world yes

    1 input, 1 required
    • policy_jsonstringrequired“JSON string containing policy rules, e.g.”
  • generate_sbomon 2 other serversgenerates content

    “Generate a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) for your AI agent setup.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world yes

    2 inputs
    • formatstring“SBOM format: 'cyclonedx' (CycloneDX 1.7) or 'spdx' (SPDX 3.0).”
    • config_pathstring or null“Path to MCP client config directory.”
  • complianceon 1 other serverreads or searches

    “Return compliance posture with its source: the tenant's persisted evidence, or a labelled local scan.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world yes

    8 inputs
    • config_pathstring or null“Local scan only: MCP client config directory.”
    • imagestring or null“Local scan only: Docker image to scan, e.g.”
    • tenant_idstring“Tenant scope for persisted compliance.”
    • sourcestring“auto: persisted tenant evidence when it exists, else a labelled local scan.”
    • frameworkstring or null“Persisted only: add one framework's controls, e.g.”
    • controlstring or null“Persisted only: page the finding ids driving this control.”
    • limitinteger“Driving finding ids per page.”
    • cursorstring or null“driving_findings.next_cursor from the previous page.”
  • remediateon 1 other servergenerates content

    “Generate a remediation plan for vulnerabilities in your AI agent setup.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world yes

    2 inputs
    • config_pathstring or null“Path to MCP client config directory.”
    • imagestring or null“Docker image to scan, e.g.”
  • exposure_pathson 1 other serverreads or searches

    “Return the attack-path queue in the dashboard's order, with why each path ranks where it does.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world yes

    14 inputs
    • tenant_idstring“Tenant scope.”
    • scan_idstring or null“Optional historical scan ID.”
    • limitinteger“Maximum ranked exposure paths to return.”
    • viewstring“summary (default): rank, risk, KEV, evidence tier, endpoints, finding/credential ids.”
    • min_risknumber“Minimum composite path risk (0-100).”
    • min_severitystring or null“Worst on-path finding at least this severe.”
    • kevboolean or null“Only paths through a known-exploited finding (true) or none (false).”
    • has_credentialboolean or null“Only paths that do (true) or do not (false) expose a credential.”
    • source_typestring or null“Entrypoint entity type, e.g.”
    • target_idstring or null“Only paths ending at this graph node id.”
    • finding_idstring or null“CVE, advisory or finding node id on the path.”
    • credential_idstring or null“Credential name or node id exposed on the path.”
    • node_idstring or null“Any graph node the path passes through.”
    • cursorstring or null“pagination.next_cursor; keep the filters unchanged.”

Each quoted sentence is the first sentence of the publisher’s own description. The kind of tool and the “changes data” mark are our AI model’s reading of that description, not something we tested: two differently worded runs had to agree, otherwise no label is shown, and nobody has checked them by hand. A tool without the “changes data” mark is described as only reading, searching or calculating, or the two runs did not agree. No tool was called. Read the publisher’s full description before relying on it. “Publisher declares” lists the hints the server itself sends with the tool (MCP annotations: read-only, destructive, idempotent, open-world); they are the publisher's claims, not checked by us. Inputs are the parameters in the tool's own input schema: name, declared type, whether it is required, and the first sentence of its description. Read 2026-10-23.

How well are its tools described?

Features #4 and #5

How clearly this server's own tool descriptions say what a tool does, and how consistent its tool list is. The first part is an AI model's yes/no reading of each description; the second part is counted. We do not turn it into a grade.

Descriptions

AI reading of each description

Says what the tool does
100% of 8 tools
Says what it returns
100% of 8 tools
States limits, defaults or errors
25% of 8 tools
Says when to use it
100% of 2 tools
Items covered per tool
3.3 of 4 on average

Counted from the listing

Parameters with a description
100% of 55
Tools with a description
100% of 8
Typical description length
543 characters

The tool set

Counted from the listing

Tools
8
Size of the list
about 4,984 tokens for an agent to load (characters ÷ 4)
Naming
4 of 8 names use single lower-case words

AI reading: easy to mix up

No pair found.

The AI items cover 8 of 8 tools: for a tool where two differently worded runs disagreed, that item is left out. They were not checked by hand, and no tool was called. “Easy to mix up” means two tools whose names or descriptions overlap without saying how they differ; the AI found none. We do not rate whether the tool set is complete or whether side effects are spelled out, because our AI reading of those was not reliable enough.

How do I add it to my client?

Config from the registry entry

From the PyPI package agent-bom

Our sandbox started this package on 2026-10-23 (a read-only session: no tool was called).

Add to CursorAn install link in the format Cursor documents, holding the Cursor config below. The command runs the publisher’s code on your machine.

Claude Desktop · claude_desktop_config.json (Settings → Developer → Edit Config)
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agent-bom": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "agent-bom==0.110.0",
        "mcp",
        "server"
      ]
    }
  }
}
Cursor · .cursor/mcp.json in a project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agent-bom": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "agent-bom==0.110.0",
        "mcp",
        "server"
      ]
    }
  }
}
VS Code · .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "agent-bom": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "agent-bom==0.110.0",
        "mcp",
        "server"
      ]
    }
  }
}
VS Code (command line) · Bash or zsh terminal (macOS, Linux)
code --add-mcp '{"name":"agent-bom","type":"stdio","command":"uvx","args":["agent-bom==0.110.0","mcp","server"]}'
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio agent-bom -- uvx agent-bom==0.110.0 mcp server
Try it in the MCP Inspector · runs on your machine, opens in your browser · Node 22.19+
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector@2.11.0 -- uvx agent-bom==0.110.0 mcp server
  • Arguments are written as the registry entry gives them; a named one as “--name value”, the form the registry documentation shows.
  • Optional settings the entry also lists (left out above): NVD_API_KEY.
  • This runs the publisher's code on your machine (uvx). Read its README first.
  • The MCP Inspector lists the server's tools, resources and prompts; a tool you call there runs for real.

Built from the server's registry entry with each client's documented format (checked 2026-10-14; the Cursor link and the VS Code command 2026-10-19; the MCP Inspector command 2026-10-21). Values in < > are yours to fill in; this page never contains a key. Where the server needs a setting the entry does not declare, it can still fail to start.

Can it be installed, and is it up to date?

Version pin · advisories

Listed version

Registry lists
0.110.0
Latest stable
0.110.0
Status
current
Withdrawn
no

Source: pypi.org · 2026-10-23. About the version the registry lists; a manual install may resolve to a different one.

Dependency advisories

critical0high0moderate0low0

Counted in the full dependency tree as resolved on 2026-10-23 (OSV.dev). Bars share one scale. The package itself has no known vulnerability (OSV.dev).

Integrity, provenance, license

Integrity
sha256-68020368df9dcc1b5…
License
Apache-2.0

Source: the package registry · 2026-10-23.

Usage

Downloads
2,924 in the last month

Source: pypistats.org · 2026-10-23.

Does the registry listing match what we found?

Feature #6

The registry verifies a package once, when it is published, and does not re-check it. A difference below is about the listing, not a judgement of the publisher.

Registry saysWe foundResultSource · date
Published package can be startedStarted and answeredmatchesour test · 2026-10-23
Version 0.110.0 on PyPIExists and can be installedmatchesPyPI · 2026-10-23
Repository github.com/koda-ai-studio/agent-bomOpens publiclymatchesapi.github.com · 2026-10-23

Who made it?

Feature #7 · lineage

Facts about the publisher. We do not turn them into a trust score.

Namespace
io.github.koda-ai-studio
GitHub owner
an organization (koda-ai-studio)
Repository
github.com/koda-ai-studio/agent-bom
Stars
35
Repository age
181–365 days
Last push
0–30 days ago
Archived
no
Security policy
SECURITY.md

Source: the registry entry and api.github.com · 2026-10-23; security policy read from GitHub · 2026-10-23.

Publish this server? Run these checks against it yourself before release, from your own machine: a server the command starts, or your own server at its URL after a one-time proof that you control it: npx protocolprobe-selftest.

Same tools as other registry entries

Tool lists read · names compared

Its 8 tools have exactly the same names as the tools of 1 other registry entry (published under 2 registry namespaces). Their tool descriptions differ in places.

This can be one publisher's family of servers or one template reused under many names. It is a fact about the published tool lists, not a judgement of the publisher and not a safety finding; we compared tool names, not code.

Shared tool names:

checkcomplianceexposure_pathsgenerate_sbomintel_lookuppolicy_checkremediatescan

The other entries

All groups of servers with identical tool lists

Source: our read-only reads of each server's tool list · 2026-10-23. No tool was called.

Choosing

Record checks

Public records · not a safety rating

8 of 8 record checks met · 1 does not apply

  • #768 of 15,112 packages by monthly downloads, tied with 2 others (package shared with 1 other registry entry)
  • #1,377 of 22,952 repositories by GitHub stars, tied with 34 others
  • MetRegistry entry is active and says how to run itActive, with a package or a remote address.
  • MetSource repository link opensThe linked GitHub repository is public.
  • MetRepository is not archivedNot archived.
  • MetCode pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our checkLast push 0-30 days before our check.
  • MetRepository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)SECURITY.md found.
  • MetPackage names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifierApache-2.0
  • MetThe version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawnThe listed version exists and is current.
  • Does not applynpm package carries build provenance (attestation)PyPI packages have no npm-style attestation.
  • MetNo known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependenciesNone known in the package or its dependency tree.

Read from public records only: the registry entry, npm/PyPI, GitHub and advisory databases, checked 2026-10-23. No tool was called. Only “met” and “not met” are counted, so the total differs between servers; a check that does not apply or that we could not run is listed, never counted against it. It is not a safety rating. How each check works · Leaderboards

Common questions about io.github.koda-ai-studio/agent-bom

Answered from the data above

Is io.github.koda-ai-studio/agent-bom safe to install?

We do not rate servers as safe or unsafe. 8 of its 8 applicable record checks are met (facts from public records, each listed on this page). What the records show: Its source repository opens publicly. Its repository had a push in the last 90 days. The listed version is the latest stable release. The package itself has no known vulnerability (OSV.dev). Its full dependency tree has no known advisory. These are facts with their sources on this page, not a safety guarantee, and we did not run its tools.

Has io.github.koda-ai-studio/agent-bom been security tested?

Partly. 4 of the 13 checks that apply to it were exercised. We started the package in an isolated sandbox and read what it declares, but this test round was read-only, so its tools were not called. No security verdict is published before verification.

What can io.github.koda-ai-studio/agent-bom do?

It lists 8 tools. In our AI model's reading of their descriptions (two runs had to agree, nobody checked it by hand), they include tools that read or search and generate content. We did not call any tool, so this describes the text, not the behaviour.

Can io.github.koda-ai-studio/agent-bom change or delete data?

None of its 8 tools is described as changing anything (our AI model's reading of the descriptions; nobody checked it by hand). We did not call any tool.

Does io.github.koda-ai-studio/agent-bom publish a security policy?

Yes: its repository has a public security policy (github.com/koda-ai-studio/agent-bom/blob/HEAD/SECURITY.md). That is the publisher's statement, not permission for us to test the server, and we call none of its tools.

Is the listed version current?

Yes. The registry lists 0.110.0, the latest stable release on PyPI.

Where is the source code of io.github.koda-ai-studio/agent-bom?

In github.com/koda-ai-studio/agent-bom, which opens publicly.

Found this page useful?

Anonymous · no sign-in

A quick, anonymous reaction — no account, no email. One per kind from your browser. The tally updates when the page is next refreshed, and it is only a rough count, never a safety rating or a measured number of people.

Similar servers

Same topic · AI-read

Active servers whose topic is also “security” and that have at least one tool of the same kind; most kinds in common first, then most GitHub stars. The topic and the tool kinds are an AI model's reading of the publishers' descriptions, not checked by hand. Similar is not a recommendation.

Compare with another server

Side by side: registry entry, our read-only session, the tools and the 18 classification fields. Same values as each page; no score.

Security testing

What did we test, and what did we leave out?

18 checks · features #1, #2

Not probed (read-only run)

We started the package in an isolated sandbox and read what it declares, but this test round was read-only, so its tools were not called. No security score is given; a check we did not run is never counted as passed.

The 18 checks at a glanceour test · 2026-10-23
  1. Inventory: exercised
  2. Hidden instructions: exercised
  3. Real execution: not run · our policy
  4. Secret leak: not run · nothing to check it against
  5. Internal addresses: not run · our policy
  6. Unconfirmed changes: not run · our policy
  7. Bad input: not run · our policy
  8. Model requests: not run · nothing to check it against
  9. Sensitive questions: not run · nothing to check it against
  10. Folder boundary: not run · our policy
  11. Log leaks: not run · nothing to check it against
  12. Hidden content: exercised
  13. Fake assistant turns: exercised
  14. Token passthrough: not applicable
  15. Token audience: not applicable
  16. Sign-in redirect: not applicable
  17. Consent handling: not applicable
  18. Sign-in metadata: not applicable

4 exercised9 not run (reason given)5 not applicable

Each check ends in exactly one state: exercised, not run (with the reason), or not applicable (with the reason). 4 of the 13 checks that apply to it were exercised. We do not publish security-check outcomes for named servers.

Exercised · 4
  • 1Inventory
    tool-list
    Reads the declared tools, resources and prompts.exercised
  • 2Hidden instructions
    description-poisoning
    Looks for hidden instructions in tool descriptions.exercised
  • 12Hidden content
    audience-hiding
    Checks resources that hide content from the user.exercised
  • 13Fake assistant turns
    fake-assistant-turn
    Checks prompts that pose as the assistant's own words.exercised
Not run, with the reason · 9
  • 3Real execution
    real-execution
    Calls a tool and checks what really happens.This check calls the package's tools. This test round was read-only, so no tool was called; tools can act on outside services with the publisher's or a user's account.not run · our policy
  • 4Secret leak
    canary-leak
    Plants a fake secret and checks whether it leaks.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against
  • 5Internal addresses
    ssrf
    Checks whether a tool can be steered to internal addresses.This check calls the package's tools. This test round was read-only, so no tool was called; tools can act on outside services with the publisher's or a user's account.not run · our policy
  • 6Unconfirmed changes
    write-without-confirmation
    Checks whether tools that change data act without asking.This check calls the package's tools. This test round was read-only, so no tool was called; tools can act on outside services with the publisher's or a user's account.not run · our policy
  • 7Bad input
    error-handling
    Sends bad input and watches how the server answers.This check calls the package's tools. This test round was read-only, so no tool was called; tools can act on outside services with the publisher's or a user's account.not run · our policy
  • 8Model requests
    sampling
    Checks whether the server asks the client's model to act for it.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against
  • 9Sensitive questions
    elicitation-sensitive-data
    Checks whether the server asks users for sensitive data.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against
  • 10Folder boundary
    root-boundary
    Checks whether the server reaches outside the folders it was given.This check calls the package's tools. This test round was read-only, so no tool was called; tools can act on outside services with the publisher's or a user's account.not run · our policy
  • 11Log leaks
    logging-side-channel
    Checks whether log messages carry data they should not.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against
Does not apply to this server · 5
  • 14Token passthrough
    token-passthrough
    Checks whether the server forwards a user's token to other services.The server runs locally over standard input/output, so there is no sign-in flow to check.not applicable
  • 15Token audience
    token-audience-validation
    Checks whether tokens meant for another service are accepted.The server runs locally over standard input/output, so there is no sign-in flow to check.not applicable
  • 16Sign-in redirect
    open-redirect
    Checks the sign-in redirect for abuse.The server runs locally over standard input/output, so there is no sign-in flow to check.not applicable
  • 17Consent handling
    confused-deputy
    Checks consent handling when one service acts for another.The server runs locally over standard input/output, so there is no sign-in flow to check.not applicable
  • 18Sign-in metadata
    oauth-url-scheme
    Checks the published sign-in metadata for unsafe URLs.The server runs locally over standard input/output, so there is no sign-in flow to check.not applicable

Source: our own test in an isolated sandbox, 2026-10-23, mcp-runtime-engine@0.1.0. Which checks count and why follows our published scoring model.

What happened during the test?

Feature #8

The steps in order, as the test record holds them.

  1. 0 msStarted the published package in an isolated sandbox (read-only mode)
  2. 11,879 msConnected after 0 redirects.
  3. Read the inventory: 8 tools, 4 resources, 3 prompts.
  4. 12,414 msFinished: 4 checks exercised.

Reference

How is it classified?

18 fields

One value per field, each with its source. Fields written by AI models are marked. A field with no value says why.

TopicAI-classified
AI-classified · 2026-10-23
Pricing modelAI-classified
not checked
no website in the registry entry
Programming language
api.github.com · 2026-10-23
Hosting type
registry · 2026-10-23
MCP capability
prompts, resources, tools
our test · 2026-10-23
Transport
standard input/output
registry · 2026-10-23
Required credentials
none declared
registry · no declaration is not a guarantee
Package registry
registry · 2026-10-23
Freshness
0–30 days
registry updatedAt · 2026-10-23
Lifecycle status
registry · 2026-10-23
License class
package registry · 2026-10-23
Integrity hash
declared (sha256)
package registry · 2026-10-23
Signature / provenance
does not apply
PyPI publishes no registry signature or attestation equivalent to npm dist.signatures
Dependency advisories
none known
OSV.dev · 2026-10-23
Popularity
2,924 downloads a month
package registry · 2026-10-23
Publisher signals
owner: an organization · repository age: 181–365 days · stars: 10–99
api.github.com · 2026-10-23
Maintenance
api.github.com · 2026-10-23
Environment
your machine
where it runs, from the hosting type

“Not stated” means the source did not state it; “does not apply” means it does not apply to this kind of server; “our limit” means our own lookup failed. A linked value opens the directory filtered to the same value.

Cite or correct this page

Sources and corrections

Suggested citation

ProtocolProbe. “io.github.koda-ai-studio/agent-bom: MCP server record.” Data checked 2026-10-23. https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/io.github.koda-ai-studio/agent-bom

Figures are valid for the date shown. Our facts on this page are CC BY 4.0: reuse them with a link and the check date. Quoted text (the publisher’s descriptions, website quotes, tool names) is not ours to license.

As JSON: this record in the API · API documentation.

Badge for your README

ProtocolProbe: 8 of 8 record checks met

[![ProtocolProbe](https://protocolprobe.com/api/v1/badge/io.github.koda-ai-studio/agent-bom)](https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/io.github.koda-ai-studio/agent-bom)

It shows this server's record-check count: facts from public records, no tool called. It is not a security rating or a pass. It links here and updates after each data reload.

Something wrong, or is this yours?

If a fact here is wrong, tell us and we will re-check it. If you operate this server, you can run our checks on it yourself with the free self-test command; we call no server’s tools ourselves for anything shown here.

Write to hello@protocolprobe.com · corrections log · methodology