MCP servers › io.github.rayson-tech › nomarmy
MCP server · registry snapshot 2026-10-23 · last tested 2026-10-23
io.github.rayson-tech/nomarmy
Sandboxed coding workers, verified: tests rerun fresh and must fail with the change reverted. — the publisher's description
Summary
io.github.rayson-tech/nomarmy is a local MCP server listed in the official MCP registry at version 0.1.0-beta.14. On 2026-10-23 ProtocolProbe started its published package in an isolated sandbox in read-only mode and read its inventory: 17 tools, 0 resources and 0 prompts.
Record checks
7 of 8 record checks met · 1 not checked
- met: Registry entry is active and says how to run it
- met: Source repository link opens
- met: Repository is not archived
- met: Code pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our check
- met: Repository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)
- met: Package names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifier
- not checked: The version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawn
- not met: npm package carries build provenance (attestation)
- met: No known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependencies
- #412 of 15,112 packages by monthly downloads
- Not ranked by stars: 4 stars (ranked from 10)
From public records, not a safety rating. Each check with its reason · Is it safe to install?
Key facts
- Runs
- local package
- Transport
- standard input/output
- Package
- npm
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Dependencies
- no known high or critical advisories
- Repository
- public
- Tools
- 17
- Described as changing data
- 9 of 17 toolsAI-classified
- Mainly works on
- files and code on the machine it runs onAI-classified
- Topic
- developer-toolsAI-classified
- Pricing
- open-sourceAI-classified
- Last tested
- 2026-10-23
Worth knowing before you connect it
- 9 tools are described as changing something (local_worker, local_worker_start, local_worker_stop, …): our AI model's reading of the descriptions, not something we tested. We did not call them.
Each line comes from a section below, with its source and date.
How fresh this is
- Live-tested
- yes, a real session (not a text-only review)
- Last tested
- 2026-10-23
- Mode
- read-only (no tool calls)
- Latest version
- 0.1.0-beta.14, published 2026-10-21 (registry, as of the 2026-10-23 snapshot)
- First listed version
- 2026-10-10 (earliest version still in the registry; older removed versions would be earlier)
- Version history
- 11 versions listed, 2026-10-10 to 2026-10-21; 11 in the 90 days before the 2026-10-23 snapshot.(versions still listed in the registry only)
Most recent 11 versions
0.1.0-beta.14· 2026-10-210.1.0-beta.12· 2026-10-210.1.0-beta.11· 2026-10-210.1.0-beta.10· 2026-10-200.1.0-beta.9· 2026-10-150.1.0-beta.8· 2026-10-140.1.0-beta.7· 2026-10-130.1.0-beta.6· 2026-10-130.1.0-beta.4· 2026-10-130.1.0-beta.3· 2026-10-120.1.0-beta.2· 2026-10-10
- Registry data
- snapshot 2026-10-23
- Package and repository
- checked 2026-10-23
- Engine
- mcp-runtime-engine@0.1.0 · sdk@1.32.0
Changes since the last refresh
New in the registry: not in the list of 2026-10-04, listed on 2026-10-23 with version 0.1.0-beta.14 (published 2026-10-21).
Source: the official MCP Registry list on 2026-10-04 and on 2026-10-23.
What it is
What does this server offer?
Observed inventoryWhat it mainly works on, as our AI model read its tool descriptions: files and code on the machine it runs on.
9 of 17 tools are described as changing something (creating, editing, deleting, sending or running).
- local_workerruns code or commandsdescribed as changing data
“Run one isolated local worker and wait for it.”
25 inputs, 1 required
taskstringrequired“implement: the OBJECTIVE the worker must achieve, not the edit it should make.”criteriaarray“implement: contract IDs from acceptance/*.yml served by this job, read at base_ref when set (else the working tree).”acceptancearray“implement: acceptance criteria the worker must satisfy.”verificationstring“Verification profile NAME (e.g.”refactorboolean“implement: declares a behavior-preserving change (moving or restructuring code).”verify_regressionboolean“implement only: after the diff passes `verification` and touches production files, temporarily revert just those production files, re-run the SAME verification…”modestring“verify: run a required verification profile with no worker and no model tokens; base_ref selects the branch or commit (default current HEAD), task is a short r…”base_refstringtimeout_secondsinteger“Default 600; 1200 for a review scout (one with `reviews`, or an army role in the review phase), since a real security review read for the full 10 minutes and w…”reasoningstring“Thinking level passed to the worker model: off, minimal, low, medium, high, xhigh, adaptive, max or ultra (the higher ones only where the vendor offers them, e…”agentstring“Run on this agent from the operator's agents.yml, by name (e.g.”modelstring“The model to run on the job's agent (an api or subscription agent), e.g.”run_idstring“The /feature run this job belongs to (from run_start).”reportstring“How much the worker may report back, capped by its agent's tier: brief (today's local-sized report), standard (the default), full (the frontier ceiling: about …”stakesstring“implement: how much a mistake would cost, separate from how hard the work is.”reviewsstring“scout: the job id this scout independently reviews, so the review is recorded against that job (nomarmy stats shows high-stakes jobs with and without one).”commit_subjectstring“implement: the subject line of the commit nomArmy makes on the worker branch, e.g.”army_rolestring“Dispatch by army role (e.g.”confirm_over_limitboolean“Override a reached usage limit: the General must ask the operator before resubmitting with confirm_over_limit: true, or send the job to another agent.”on_behalf_ofstring“Required when the job's agent is a subscription: must exactly match that agent's owner in agents.yml, or nomArmy refuses the job.”evidencestring“implement only: facts YOU already resolved (e.g.”reference_commitsarray“Earlier changes this job's worker reads as patch files under .openclaw/reference/ (git history isn't available in the sandbox): a job id (that job's change aga…”continue_fromstring“implement only: the job id of a retained, uncommitted implement job (partial, blocked, or failed verification) whose unfinished work this job should finish.”detachboolean“local_worker_start only: run the job in its own process instead of this session's MCP server, so it keeps running (and records its result) after this session e…”worker_idstring
- local_worker_startruns code or commandsdescribed as changing data
“Start one worker or scout in the background and return immediately with a job_id.”
25 inputs, 1 required
taskstringrequired“implement: the OBJECTIVE the worker must achieve, not the edit it should make.”criteriaarray“implement: contract IDs from acceptance/*.yml served by this job, read at base_ref when set (else the working tree).”acceptancearray“implement: acceptance criteria the worker must satisfy.”verificationstring“Verification profile NAME (e.g.”refactorboolean“implement: declares a behavior-preserving change (moving or restructuring code).”verify_regressionboolean“implement only: after the diff passes `verification` and touches production files, temporarily revert just those production files, re-run the SAME verification…”modestring“verify: run a required verification profile with no worker and no model tokens; base_ref selects the branch or commit (default current HEAD), task is a short r…”base_refstringtimeout_secondsinteger“Default 600; 1200 for a review scout (one with `reviews`, or an army role in the review phase), since a real security review read for the full 10 minutes and w…”reasoningstring“Thinking level passed to the worker model: off, minimal, low, medium, high, xhigh, adaptive, max or ultra (the higher ones only where the vendor offers them, e…”agentstring“Run on this agent from the operator's agents.yml, by name (e.g.”modelstring“The model to run on the job's agent (an api or subscription agent), e.g.”run_idstring“The /feature run this job belongs to (from run_start).”reportstring“How much the worker may report back, capped by its agent's tier: brief (today's local-sized report), standard (the default), full (the frontier ceiling: about …”stakesstring“implement: how much a mistake would cost, separate from how hard the work is.”reviewsstring“scout: the job id this scout independently reviews, so the review is recorded against that job (nomarmy stats shows high-stakes jobs with and without one).”commit_subjectstring“implement: the subject line of the commit nomArmy makes on the worker branch, e.g.”army_rolestring“Dispatch by army role (e.g.”confirm_over_limitboolean“Override a reached usage limit: the General must ask the operator before resubmitting with confirm_over_limit: true, or send the job to another agent.”on_behalf_ofstring“Required when the job's agent is a subscription: must exactly match that agent's owner in agents.yml, or nomArmy refuses the job.”evidencestring“implement only: facts YOU already resolved (e.g.”reference_commitsarray“Earlier changes this job's worker reads as patch files under .openclaw/reference/ (git history isn't available in the sandbox): a job id (that job's change aga…”continue_fromstring“implement only: the job id of a retained, uncommitted implement job (partial, blocked, or failed verification) whose unfinished work this job should finish.”detachboolean“local_worker_start only: run the job in its own process instead of this session's MCP server, so it keeps running (and records its result) after this session e…”worker_idstring
- local_worker_statusreads or searches
“Status of one job, started by this session or any other (a detached job included): phase (starting, worktree, worker, verification, commit, record, finished), elapsed time against its timeout, and th…”
4 inputs, 1 required
job_idstringrequiredwait_secondsintegerfullbooleanreportboolean“Just the report and nomArmy's verdict on it, without the rest of the record.”
“What nomArmy's own job records show for this repository (or all repositories): jobs by mode, role and model; code committed; worker and job time; tokens and API spend; claim vs evidence (how often a …”
8 inputs
sincestring“Only jobs started since this: a date (2026-09-25) or an age (7d, 24h).”untilstring“Only jobs started before this date.”all_reposboolean“Every repository this machine's nomArmy has run jobs for, not just this one.”repostring“Another repository, by path or folder name ("senti" matches rayson-senti if unambiguous).”rolestring“Only jobs dispatched as this army role (e.g.”modelstring“Only jobs that ran on this model (e.g.”formatstring“text (default) is the report; json is the raw numbers.”detailsboolean“The full report (volume, reviewers, flags, what didn't finish).”
- local_worker_stopruns code or commandsdescribed as changing data
“Stop a running job's worker, for example one burning a frontier model's usage on the wrong track.”
2 inputs, 1 required
job_idstringrequiredreasonstring“Why it's being stopped; recorded in the job's issues.”
- local_worker_capacityreads or searches
“What this host can take right now: context per nom and the brief/report budgets derived from it, memory pressure and whether another job would be admitted, and the jobs currently running.”
Takes no inputs.
“Start a /feature run (or reattach to one with `resume`): one feature, end to end, with limits.”
5 inputs
namestring“A short name for the feature (required unless resuming).”resumestring“Reattach this session to an existing, still-running run (e.g.”max_jobsintegermax_api_usdnumbermax_hoursnumber
“A /feature run's limits, what it has used (jobs, api spend, hours), per-agent jobs/spend/tokens, warnings (80% of a limit, paused agents), and its log path.”
1 input, 1 required
run_idstringrequired
- run_finishruns code or commandsdescribed as changing data
“Close a /feature run as complete or stopped, with a one-paragraph summary.”
3 inputs, 3 required
run_idstringrequiredstatusstringrequiredsummarystringrequired
- armyreads or searches
“Who you, the General, are and who you call for what in this repository: your fixed charter and the agent you're defined as, the army's workflow, then each role's description, phase (build, review, ac…”
Takes no inputs.
- local_worker_configreads or searches
“What this checkout's .nomarmy.yml defines -- the one file every job's sandbox image and every verification uses, whichever branch the job starts from (never the job worktree's own copy, which a worke…”
Takes no inputs.
- local_workersruns code or commandsdescribed as changing data
“Run independent jobs (implement or scout) with bounded parallelism and wait for all of them.”
4 inputs, 1 required
jobsarrayrequiredmax_parallelinteger“A cap on how many of this batch run at once.”auto_unionboolean“After all jobs finish, mechanically merge (git merge --no-ff) implement jobs that reached a valid outcome and touched non-overlapping files into ONE new integr…”union_verificationstring“Verification profile NAME to run once against the union branch after merging (same semantics as each job's own `verification` field).”
Show 5 more tools
- repo_evidenceruns code or commandsdescribed as changing data
“Deterministic repository evidence with exact [path:line] citations and no model involved.”
8 inputs, 1 required
opstringrequiredquerystringpathstringglobstringmax_resultsintegerignore_casebooleanwhole_wordbooleanjsonboolean
- commit_showreads or searches
“Read-only: what a job or a commit changed.”
4 inputs, 1 required
refstringrequired“A job id (for example worker-20261019-134317-214b60), or a commit SHA, branch or tag in this repository.”basestring“A commit to compare against instead of the first parent (not with a job id).”pathsarray“Only these paths.”max_bytesinteger
- local_worker_jobsreads or searches
“List recent job records for review/recovery, including jobs still running or orphaned by a server restart.”
2 inputs
limitintegerfullboolean“Return each job's complete, uncompacted manifest instead of the small default projection.”
- local_worker_sweepdeletesdescribed as changing data
“Bulk-reap job worktrees/branches that are PROVABLY EMPTY: the branch's tip is identical to the base SHA it started from (zero commits) AND the worktree has no uncommitted changes left either -- there…”
4 inputs
older_than_hoursnumber“Only consider jobs finished (or, if never finished, last touched) at least this many hours ago.”delete_branchesboolean“Also delete each reaped job's branch.”dry_runboolean“Report what WOULD be reaped without removing anything.”limitinteger“Maximum number of job directories to examine in one call.”
- local_worker_cleanupdeletesdescribed as changing data
“Remove a retained worker worktree and optionally its agent branch after Claude has reviewed/integrated or deliberately discarded it.”
3 inputs, 1 required
job_idstringrequireddelete_branchbooleanforceboolean
Each quoted sentence is the first sentence of the publisher’s own description. The kind of tool and the “changes data” mark are our AI model’s reading of that description, not something we tested: two differently worded runs had to agree, otherwise no label is shown, and nobody has checked them by hand. A tool without the “changes data” mark is described as only reading, searching or calculating, or the two runs did not agree. No tool was called. Read the publisher’s full description before relying on it. Inputs are the parameters in the tool's own input schema: name, declared type, whether it is required, and the first sentence of its description. Read 2026-10-23.
How well are its tools described?
Features #4 and #5
How clearly this server's own tool descriptions say what a tool does, and how consistent its tool list is. The first part is an AI model's yes/no reading of each description; the second part is counted. We do not turn it into a grade.
Descriptions
AI reading of each description
- Says what the tool does
- 100% of 17 tools
- Says what it returns
- 81% of 16 tools
- States limits, defaults or errors
- 79% of 14 tools
- Says when to use it
- 75% of 16 tools
- Items covered per tool
- 3.4 of 4 on average
Counted from the listing
- Parameters with a description
- 70% of 98
- Tools with a description
- 100% of 17
- Typical description length
- 501 characters
The tool set
Counted from the listing
- Tools
- 17
- Size of the list
- about 12,996 tokens for an agent to load (characters ÷ 4)
- Naming
- 15 of 17 names use snake_case
AI reading: easy to mix up
No pair found.
The AI items cover 17 of 17 tools: for a tool where two differently worded runs disagreed, that item is left out. They were not checked by hand, and no tool was called. “Easy to mix up” means two tools whose names or descriptions overlap without saying how they differ; the AI found none. We do not rate whether the tool set is complete or whether side effects are spelled out, because our AI reading of those was not reliable enough.
How do I add it to my client?
Config from the registry entry
From the npm package nomarmy
Our sandbox started this package on 2026-10-23 (a read-only session: no tool was called).
Add to CursorAn install link in the format Cursor documents, holding the Cursor config below. The command runs the publisher’s code on your machine.
Claude Desktop · claude_desktop_config.json (Settings → Developer → Edit Config)
{
"mcpServers": {
"nomarmy": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"nomarmy@0.1.0-beta.14",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}Cursor · .cursor/mcp.json in a project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"nomarmy": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"nomarmy@0.1.0-beta.14",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}VS Code · .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"nomarmy": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"nomarmy@0.1.0-beta.14",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}VS Code (command line) · Bash or zsh terminal (macOS, Linux)
code --add-mcp '{"name":"nomarmy","type":"stdio","command":"npx","args":["-y","nomarmy@0.1.0-beta.14","mcp"]}'Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio nomarmy -- npx -y nomarmy@0.1.0-beta.14 mcp
Try it in the MCP Inspector · runs on your machine, opens in your browser · Node 22.19+
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector@2.11.0 -- npx -y nomarmy@0.1.0-beta.14 mcp
- Arguments are written as the registry entry gives them; a named one as “--name value”, the form the registry documentation shows.
- This runs the publisher's code on your machine (npx). Read its README first.
- The MCP Inspector lists the server's tools, resources and prompts; a tool you call there runs for real.
Built from the server's registry entry with each client's documented format (checked 2026-10-14; the Cursor link and the VS Code command 2026-10-19; the MCP Inspector command 2026-10-21). Values in < > are yours to fill in; this page never contains a key. Where the server needs a setting the entry does not declare, it can still fail to start.
Can it be installed, and is it up to date?
Version pin · advisories
Listed version
- Registry lists
- 0.1.0-beta.14
- Withdrawn
- no
Source: registry.npmjs.org · 2026-10-23. About the version the registry lists; a manual install may resolve to a different one.
Dependency advisories
Counted in the full dependency tree as resolved on 2026-10-23 (npm audit). Bars share one scale. The package itself has no known vulnerability (OSV.dev).
Integrity, provenance, license
- Integrity
- sha512-Lh1YSxkCQzftPN1gG…
- Signature
- signed
- License
- Apache-2.0
Source: the package registry · 2026-10-23.
Usage
- Downloads
- 5,269 in the last month
Source: api.npmjs.org · 2026-10-23.
Does the registry listing match what we found?
Feature #6The registry verifies a package once, when it is published, and does not re-check it. A difference below is about the listing, not a judgement of the publisher.
| Registry says | We found | Result | Source · date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published package can be started | Started and answered | matches | our test · 2026-10-23 |
| Repository github.com/rayson-tech/nomarmy | Opens publicly | matches | api.github.com · 2026-10-23 |
Who made it?
Feature #7 · lineage
Facts about the publisher. We do not turn them into a trust score.
- Namespace
- io.github.rayson-tech
- GitHub owner
- an organization (rayson-tech)
- Build record
- signed
- Repository
- github.com/rayson-tech/nomarmy
- Stars
- 4
- Repository age
- 31–90 days
- Last push
- 0–30 days ago
- Archived
- no
- Security policy
- SECURITY.md
Source: the registry entry and api.github.com · 2026-10-23; security policy read from GitHub · 2026-10-23.
Publish this server? Run these checks against it yourself before release, from your own machine: a server the command starts, or your own server at its URL after a one-time proof that you control it: npx protocolprobe-selftest.
Choosing
Record checks
Public records · not a safety rating7 of 8 record checks met · 1 not checked
- #412 of 15,112 packages by monthly downloads
- Not ranked by stars: 4 stars (ranked from 10)
- MetRegistry entry is active and says how to run itActive, with a package or a remote address.
- MetSource repository link opensThe linked GitHub repository is public.
- MetRepository is not archivedNot archived.
- MetCode pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our checkLast push 0-30 days before our check.
- MetRepository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)SECURITY.md found.
- MetPackage names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifierApache-2.0
- Not checkedThe version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawnNo stable release to compare against.
- Not metnpm package carries build provenance (attestation)Signed by npm, but no build attestation.
- MetNo known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependenciesNone known in the package or its dependency tree.
Read from public records only: the registry entry, npm/PyPI, GitHub and advisory databases, checked 2026-10-23. No tool was called. Only “met” and “not met” are counted, so the total differs between servers; a check that does not apply or that we could not run is listed, never counted against it. It is not a safety rating. How each check works · Leaderboards
Common questions about io.github.rayson-tech/nomarmy
Answered from the data aboveIs io.github.rayson-tech/nomarmy safe to install?
We do not rate servers as safe or unsafe. 7 of its 8 applicable record checks are met (facts from public records, each listed on this page). What the records show: Its source repository opens publicly. Its repository had a push in the last 90 days. The package itself has no known vulnerability (OSV.dev). Its full dependency tree has no known advisory. 9 of its tools describe changing data (our AI model's reading of the descriptions). These are facts with their sources on this page, not a safety guarantee, and we did not run its tools.
Is io.github.rayson-tech/nomarmy free to use?
Its website (nomarmy.dev/) describes a open-source pricing model. This is an AI-classified reading of the page on 2026-10-23, so check the page itself before relying on it.
Has io.github.rayson-tech/nomarmy been security tested?
Partly. 2 of the 12 checks that apply to it were exercised. We started the package in an isolated sandbox and read what it declares, but this test round was read-only, so its tools were not called. No security verdict is published before verification.
What can io.github.rayson-tech/nomarmy do?
It lists 17 tools. In our AI model's reading of their descriptions (two runs had to agree, nobody checked it by hand), they include tools that read or search, delete and run code or commands. We did not call any tool, so this describes the text, not the behaviour.
Can io.github.rayson-tech/nomarmy change or delete data?
9 of its tools say in their description that they create, edit, delete, send or run something (our AI model's reading). We did not call any tool, so we cannot say what actually happens.
Does io.github.rayson-tech/nomarmy publish a security policy?
Yes: its repository has a public security policy (github.com/rayson-tech/nomarmy/blob/HEAD/SECURITY.md). That is the publisher's statement, not permission for us to test the server, and we call none of its tools.
Where is the source code of io.github.rayson-tech/nomarmy?
In github.com/rayson-tech/nomarmy, which opens publicly.
Found this page useful?
Anonymous · no sign-inA quick, anonymous reaction — no account, no email. One per kind from your browser. The tally updates when the page is next refreshed, and it is only a rough count, never a safety rating or a measured number of people.
Similar servers
Same topic · AI-read
- io.github.callstack/agent-deviceagent-devicealso has tools that deletes, runs code or commands, reads or searchescompare with this one
- io.github.A9T9/uivision-mcpUi.Vision MCPalso has tools that deletes, runs code or commands, reads or searchescompare with this one
- io.github.Buoy-gg/mcpalso has tools that deletes, runs code or commands, reads or searchescompare with this one
- io.github.jumodada/drissionpage-mcpDrissionPage MCPalso has tools that deletes, runs code or commands, reads or searchescompare with this one
- io.github.tugcantopaloglu/godot-mcpGodot MCPalso has tools that deletes, runs code or commands, reads or searchescompare with this one
- io.github.tomyud1/godot-mcpalso has tools that deletes, runs code or commands, reads or searchescompare with this one
Active servers whose topic is also “developer-tools” and that have at least one tool of the same kind; most kinds in common first, then most GitHub stars. The topic and the tool kinds are an AI model's reading of the publishers' descriptions, not checked by hand. Similar is not a recommendation.
Compare with another server
Side by side: registry entry, our read-only session, the tools and the 18 classification fields. Same values as each page; no score.
Security testing
What did we test, and what did we leave out?
18 checks · features #1, #2
Not probed (read-only run)
We started the package in an isolated sandbox and read what it declares, but this test round was read-only, so its tools were not called. No security score is given; a check we did not run is never counted as passed.
- Inventory: exercised
- Hidden instructions: exercised
- Real execution: not run · our policy
- Secret leak: not run · nothing to check it against
- Internal addresses: not run · our policy
- Unconfirmed changes: not run · our policy
- Bad input: not run · our policy
- Model requests: not run · nothing to check it against
- Sensitive questions: not run · nothing to check it against
- Folder boundary: not run · our policy
- Log leaks: not run · nothing to check it against
- Hidden content: not run · nothing to check it against
- Fake assistant turns: not applicable
- Token passthrough: not applicable
- Token audience: not applicable
- Sign-in redirect: not applicable
- Consent handling: not applicable
- Sign-in metadata: not applicable
2 exercised10 not run (reason given)6 not applicable
Each check ends in exactly one state: exercised, not run (with the reason), or not applicable (with the reason). 2 of the 12 checks that apply to it were exercised. We do not publish security-check outcomes for named servers.
- 1Inventory
tool-listReads the declared tools, resources and prompts.exercised - 2Hidden instructions
description-poisoningLooks for hidden instructions in tool descriptions.exercised
- 3Real execution
real-executionCalls a tool and checks what really happens.This check calls the package's tools. This test round was read-only, so no tool was called; tools can act on outside services with the publisher's or a user's account.not run · our policy - 4Secret leak
canary-leakPlants a fake secret and checks whether it leaks.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against - 5Internal addresses
ssrfChecks whether a tool can be steered to internal addresses.This check calls the package's tools. This test round was read-only, so no tool was called; tools can act on outside services with the publisher's or a user's account.not run · our policy - 6Unconfirmed changes
write-without-confirmationChecks whether tools that change data act without asking.This check calls the package's tools. This test round was read-only, so no tool was called; tools can act on outside services with the publisher's or a user's account.not run · our policy - 7Bad input
error-handlingSends bad input and watches how the server answers.This check calls the package's tools. This test round was read-only, so no tool was called; tools can act on outside services with the publisher's or a user's account.not run · our policy - 8Model requests
samplingChecks whether the server asks the client's model to act for it.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against - 9Sensitive questions
elicitation-sensitive-dataChecks whether the server asks users for sensitive data.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against - 10Folder boundary
root-boundaryChecks whether the server reaches outside the folders it was given.This check calls the package's tools. This test round was read-only, so no tool was called; tools can act on outside services with the publisher's or a user's account.not run · our policy - 11Log leaks
logging-side-channelChecks whether log messages carry data they should not.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against - 12Hidden content
audience-hidingChecks resources that hide content from the user.This check needs content the server returns, and nothing was read or called.not run · nothing to check it against
- 13Fake assistant turns
fake-assistant-turnChecks prompts that pose as the assistant's own words.The server exposes no prompts.not applicable - 14Token passthrough
token-passthroughChecks whether the server forwards a user's token to other services.The server runs locally over standard input/output, so there is no sign-in flow to check.not applicable - 15Token audience
token-audience-validationChecks whether tokens meant for another service are accepted.The server runs locally over standard input/output, so there is no sign-in flow to check.not applicable - 16Sign-in redirect
open-redirectChecks the sign-in redirect for abuse.The server runs locally over standard input/output, so there is no sign-in flow to check.not applicable - 17Consent handling
confused-deputyChecks consent handling when one service acts for another.The server runs locally over standard input/output, so there is no sign-in flow to check.not applicable - 18Sign-in metadata
oauth-url-schemeChecks the published sign-in metadata for unsafe URLs.The server runs locally over standard input/output, so there is no sign-in flow to check.not applicable
Source: our own test in an isolated sandbox, 2026-10-23, mcp-runtime-engine@0.1.0. Which checks count and why follows our published scoring model.
What happened during the test?
Feature #8
The steps in order, as the test record holds them.
- 0 msStarted the published package in an isolated sandbox (read-only mode)
- 9,660 msConnected after 0 redirects.
- Read the inventory: 17 tools, 0 resources, 0 prompts.
- 10,808 msFinished: 2 checks exercised.
Reference
How is it classified?
18 fields
One value per field, each with its source. Fields written by AI models are marked. A field with no value says why.
“nomArmy is open source under Apache 2.0.”
“Not stated” means the source did not state it; “does not apply” means it does not apply to this kind of server; “our limit” means our own lookup failed. A linked value opens the directory filtered to the same value.
Cite or correct this page
Sources and corrections
Suggested citation
ProtocolProbe. “io.github.rayson-tech/nomarmy: MCP server record.” Data checked 2026-10-23. https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/io.github.rayson-tech/nomarmy
Figures are valid for the date shown. Our facts on this page are CC BY 4.0: reuse them with a link and the check date. Quoted text (the publisher’s descriptions, website quotes, tool names) is not ours to license.
As JSON: this record in the API · API documentation.
Badge for your README
[](https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/io.github.rayson-tech/nomarmy)
It shows this server's record-check count: facts from public records, no tool called. It is not a security rating or a pass. It links here and updates after each data reload.
Something wrong, or is this yours?
If a fact here is wrong, tell us and we will re-check it. If you operate this server, you can run our checks on it yourself with the free self-test command; we call no server’s tools ourselves for anything shown here.
Write to hello@protocolprobe.com · corrections log · methodology