MCP servers › io.usefulapi › enginemailer
MCP server · registry snapshot 2026-10-24 · last tested 2026-10-24
io.usefulapi/enginemailer
Read Enginemailer subscribers, lists and campaigns; add subscribers, create and send campaigns. — the publisher's description
Summary
io.usefulapi/enginemailer is a remote MCP server listed in the official MCP registry at version 1.0.0. On 2026-10-24 ProtocolProbe connected to it in read-only mode and read its inventory: 17 tools, 0 resources and 1 prompt.
Record checks
4 of 4 record checks met · 4 do not apply · 1 not checked
- met: Registry entry is active and says how to run it
- met: Source repository link opens
- met: Repository is not archived
- met: Code pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our check
- not checked: Repository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)
- not applicable: Package names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifier
- not applicable: The version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawn
- not applicable: npm package carries build provenance (attestation)
- not applicable: No known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependencies
From public records, not a safety rating. Each check with its reason · Is it safe to install?
Key facts
- Runs
- remote (hosted by the publisher)
- Transport
- streamable HTTP
- Sign-in
- none needed to open a session
- Repository
- public
- Tools
- 17
- Last tested
- 2026-10-24
Observed fact
This server accepted a session without any credential and lists 8 tools whose name or declaration suggests they change data (enginemailer_add_subscriber, enginemailer_update_subscriber, enginemailer_unsubscribe_subscriber, enginemailer_save_subscriber_category, enginemailer_create_campaign and 3 more). That is our reading of the names; we did not call them. Source: our connection, 2026-10-24.
How fresh this is
- Live-tested
- yes, a real session (not a text-only review)
- Last tested
- 2026-10-24
- Mode
- read-only (no tool calls)
- Latest version
- 1.0.0, published 2026-10-24 (registry, as of the 2026-10-24 snapshot)
- First listed version
- 2026-10-24 (earliest version still in the registry; older removed versions would be earlier)
- Registry data
- snapshot 2026-10-24
- Package and repository
- checked 2026-10-24
- Engine
- mcp-runtime-engine@0.1.0 · sdk@1.32.0
Changes since the last refresh
New in the registry: not in the list of 2026-10-23, listed on 2026-10-24 with version 1.0.0 (published 2026-10-24).
Source: the official MCP Registry list on 2026-10-23 and on 2026-10-24.
What it is
What does this server offer?
Observed inventoryNone of its 17 tools are described as changing anything. For 17 the reading was uncertain, so no mark is shown.
- enginemailer_get_subscriber
“One subscriber by email: id, status and all custom field values.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · open-world yes
1 input, 1 required
emailstringrequired“An email address (max 128 characters).”
- enginemailer_list_subscriber_categories
“The subscriber category tree: each category with its subcategories (ids, names).”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · open-world yes
1 input
include_active_subscriber_countboolean“Also return active subscriber counts (only for accounts the vendor has enabled this for).”
- enginemailer_list_custom_fields
“The subscriber custom field definitions (key, name, type).”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · open-world yes
Takes no inputs.
- enginemailer_add_subscriber
“WRITE: add a subscriber to the account (optionally into subcategories, with custom field values).”
Publisher declares: read-only no · destructive no · idempotent no · open-world yes
4 inputs, 1 required
emailstringrequired“An email address (max 128 characters).”subcategory_idsarray“Subcategory (list/segment) ids from enginemailer_list_subscriber_categories.”custom_fieldsarray“Custom field values to set.”source_typestring“Where the subscriber came from, e.g.”
- enginemailer_update_subscriber
“WRITE: change an existing subscriber's subcategories and/or custom fields.”
Publisher declares: read-only no · destructive yes · idempotent yes · open-world yes
5 inputs, 1 required
emailstringrequired“An email address (max 128 characters).”subcategory_idsarray“Subcategory (list/segment) ids from enginemailer_list_subscriber_categories.”subcategories_modestring“How subcategory_ids apply (default append).”custom_fieldsarray“Custom field values to set.”custom_fields_modestring“update_given changes only the listed fields; replace_all (the vendor default) clears the others.”
- enginemailer_unsubscribe_subscriber
“WRITE: unsubscribe a subscriber so they no longer receive campaigns.”
Publisher declares: read-only no · destructive yes · idempotent yes · open-world yes
1 input, 1 required
emailstringrequired“An email address (max 128 characters).”
- enginemailer_save_subscriber_category
“WRITE: create a subscriber category (category_id 0) or update one (its id), with subcategories (subcategory_id 0 creates one).”
Publisher declares: read-only no · destructive yes · idempotent no · open-world yes
5 inputs, 2 required
category_idintegerrequired“0 to create a new category, else the existing category id.”namestringrequireddescriptionstringis_visibleboolean“Visible to subscribers (default true).”subcategoriesarray
- enginemailer_list_campaigns
“List campaigns that have NOT been delivered yet (drafts and scheduled ones): id, name, subject, sender and schedule.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · open-world yes
Takes no inputs.
- enginemailer_get_campaign_stats
“Delivery results of a DELIVERED campaign: emails sent, delivered, bounces, opens, unique opens, clicks, unique clicks, unsubscribes, spam complaints.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · open-world yes
1 input, 1 required
campaign_idintegerrequired“Campaign id.”
- enginemailer_list_campaign_categories
“The categories that campaign recipients can be filtered by (id, name, description).”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · open-world yes
Takes no inputs.
- enginemailer_list_campaign_subcategories
“The subcategories of one campaign category (id, name, description); use these ids in enginemailer_assign_campaign_recipients.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · open-world yes
1 input, 1 required
category_idintegerrequired“Category id from enginemailer_list_campaign_categories.”
- enginemailer_create_campaign
“WRITE: create a campaign DRAFT.”
Publisher declares: read-only no · destructive no · idempotent no · open-world yes
6 inputs, 5 required
namestringrequired“Internal campaign name.”sender_namestringrequiredsender_emailstringrequired“Sender address on a verified domain.”reply_tostring“An email address (max 128 characters).”subjectstringrequiredcontent_htmlstringrequired“The email body, HTML (max 256 KB).”
Show 5 more tools
- enginemailer_assign_campaign_recipients
“WRITE: set who a campaign will go to: all subscribers, or the subscribers in the given subcategory ids (match_type any = OR, all = AND).”
Publisher declares: read-only no · destructive yes · idempotent yes · open-world yes
4 inputs, 2 required
campaign_idintegerrequired“Campaign id.”audiencestringrequiredsubcategory_idsarray“Required when audience is subcategories.”match_typestring“any = subscribers in at least one subcategory (OR, default); all = in every one (AND).”
- enginemailer_send_campaign
“WRITE, SENDS EMAIL TO CUSTOMERS NOW and cannot be undone: delivers the campaign to its assigned recipients immediately.”
Publisher declares: read-only no · destructive yes · idempotent no · open-world yes
2 inputs, 2 required
campaign_idintegerrequired“Campaign id.”confirmbooleanrequired“Must be true: the user has approved sending this campaign to its recipients now.”
- enginemailer_send_transactional_email
“WRITE, SENDS ONE EMAIL NOW and cannot be undone: submits a transactional email to one recipient (plus optional CC/BCC).”
Publisher declares: read-only no · destructive yes · idempotent no · open-world yes
11 inputs, 3 required
to_emailstringrequired“An email address (max 128 characters).”sender_emailstringrequired“Sender address on a verified domain (must match the template's sender when template_id is used).”sender_namestringsubjectstringcontent_htmlstring“Email body (HTML).”template_idstring“Stored template id from the Enginemailer portal.”campaign_namestring“Label for reports.”substitution_tagsarray“Merge tags.”ccarraybccarrayconfirmbooleanrequired“Must be true: the user has approved sending this email now.”
- enginemailer_start_transactional_report_export
“Start a CSV export of the transactional email delivery report for a period (start date at most 60 days back).”
Publisher declares: read-only no · destructive no · idempotent no · open-world yes
3 inputs, 1 required
periodstringrequired“Date range exactly like '1 Sep 2026 - 16 Sep 2026'.”email_to_filterstring“Only emails sent to this recipient.”domain_filterstring“Domain filter, sent as the vendor's DomainFilter (the sender domain in the vendor's report), e.g.”
- enginemailer_check_transactional_report_export
“Status of a report export (Processing or Complete); when complete it includes the CSV download URL.”
Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · open-world yes
1 input, 1 required
export_idintegerrequired“ExportID from enginemailer_start_transactional_report_export.”
Each quoted sentence is the first sentence of the publisher’s own description. The kind of tool and the “changes data” mark are our AI model’s reading of that description, not something we tested: two differently worded runs had to agree, otherwise no label is shown, and nobody has checked them by hand. A tool without the “changes data” mark is described as only reading, searching or calculating, or the two runs did not agree. No tool was called. Read the publisher’s full description before relying on it. “Publisher declares” lists the hints the server itself sends with the tool (MCP annotations: read-only, destructive, idempotent, open-world); they are the publisher's claims, not checked by us. Inputs are the parameters in the tool's own input schema: name, declared type, whether it is required, and the first sentence of its description. Read 2026-10-24.
How well are its tools described?
Features #4 and #5
How clearly this server's own tool descriptions say what a tool does, and how consistent its tool list is. The first part is an AI model's yes/no reading of each description; the second part is counted. We do not turn it into a grade.
Descriptions
AI reading of each description
No AI reading was available for this server's tools (the two runs did not agree, or the listing was not reviewed).
Counted from the listing
- Parameters with a description
- 78% of 46
- Tools with a description
- 100% of 17
- Typical description length
- 251 characters
The tool set
Counted from the listing
- Tools
- 17
- Size of the list
- about 4,600 tokens for an agent to load (characters ÷ 4)
- Naming
- 17 of 17 names use snake_case
AI reading: easy to mix up
No pair found.
The AI items cover 0 of 17 tools: for a tool where two differently worded runs disagreed, that item is left out. They were not checked by hand, and no tool was called. “Easy to mix up” means two tools whose names or descriptions overlap without saying how they differ; the AI found none. We do not rate whether the tool set is complete or whether side effects are spelled out, because our AI reading of those was not reliable enough.
How do I add it to my client?
Config from the registry entry
From the remote endpoint (Streamable HTTP)
We connected to this URL on 2026-10-24 (a read-only session: no tool was called).
Add to CursorAn install link in the format Cursor documents, holding the Cursor config below.
Claude Desktop or claude.ai
Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector, then paste: https://enginemailer.usefulapi.io/mcp
Cursor · .cursor/mcp.json in a project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"enginemailer": {
"url": "https://enginemailer.usefulapi.io/mcp"
}
}
}VS Code · .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"enginemailer": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://enginemailer.usefulapi.io/mcp"
}
}
}VS Code (command line) · Bash or zsh terminal (macOS, Linux)
code --add-mcp '{"name":"enginemailer","type":"http","url":"https://enginemailer.usefulapi.io/mcp"}'Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http enginemailer https://enginemailer.usefulapi.io/mcp
Try it in the MCP Inspector · runs on your machine, opens in your browser · Node 22.19+
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector@2.11.0 --server-url https://enginemailer.usefulapi.io/mcp --transport http
- The server runs on the operator's infrastructure; it may ask you to sign in when you first connect.
- The MCP Inspector lists the server's tools, resources and prompts; a tool you call there runs for real.
Built from the server's registry entry with each client's documented format (checked 2026-10-14; the Cursor link and the VS Code command 2026-10-19; the MCP Inspector command 2026-10-21). Values in < > are yours to fill in; this page never contains a key. Where the server needs a setting the entry does not declare, it can still fail to start.
Does the registry listing match what we found?
Feature #6The registry verifies a package once, when it is published, and does not re-check it. A difference below is about the listing, not a judgement of the publisher.
| Registry says | We found | Result | Source · date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remote endpoint enginemailer.usefulapi.io/mcp | Session opened | matches | our test · 2026-10-24 |
| No credential declared as required | Opened a session without any credential | matches | our test · 2026-10-24 |
| Repository github.com/m190/usefulapi-mcp | Opens publicly | matches | api.github.com · 2026-10-24 |
Who made it?
Feature #7 · lineage
Facts about the publisher. We do not turn them into a trust score.
- Namespace
- io.usefulapi · 409 servers
- GitHub owner
- a personal account (m190)
- Repository
- github.com/m190/usefulapi-mcp
- Stars
- 0
- Repository age
- 91–180 days
- Last push
- 0–30 days ago
- Archived
- no
Source: the registry entry and api.github.com · 2026-10-24.
Publish this server? Run these checks against it yourself before release, from your own machine: a server the command starts, or your own server at its URL after a one-time proof that you control it: npx protocolprobe-selftest.
Choosing
Record checks
Public records · not a safety rating4 of 4 record checks met · 4 do not apply · 1 not checked
- MetRegistry entry is active and says how to run itActive, with a package or a remote address.
- MetSource repository link opensThe linked GitHub repository is public.
- MetRepository is not archivedNot archived.
- MetCode pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our checkLast push 0-30 days before our check.
- Not checkedRepository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)We did not read this repository's security policy.
- Does not applyPackage names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifierRemote server: it ships no package.
- Does not applyThe version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawnRemote server: it ships no package.
- Does not applynpm package carries build provenance (attestation)Remote server: it ships no package.
- Does not applyNo known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependenciesRemote server: it ships no package.
Read from public records only: the registry entry, npm/PyPI, GitHub and advisory databases, checked 2026-10-24. No tool was called. Only “met” and “not met” are counted, so the total differs between servers; a check that does not apply or that we could not run is listed, never counted against it. It is not a safety rating. How each check works · Leaderboards
Common questions about io.usefulapi/enginemailer
Answered from the data aboveIs io.usefulapi/enginemailer safe to install?
We do not rate servers as safe or unsafe. 4 of its 4 applicable record checks are met (facts from public records, each listed on this page). What the records show: Its source repository opens publicly. Its repository had a push in the last 90 days. These are facts with their sources on this page, not a safety guarantee, and we did not run its tools.
Does io.usefulapi/enginemailer need an API key or sign-in?
It opened a session without any credential on 2026-10-24. The registry entry declares no required credential; no declaration is not a guarantee.
Has io.usefulapi/enginemailer been security tested?
Partly. 3 of the 16 checks that apply to it were exercised. It accepted a session without any credential and lists tools whose names suggest they change data. We did not call them. No security verdict is published before verification.
Where is the source code of io.usefulapi/enginemailer?
In github.com/m190/usefulapi-mcp, which opens publicly.
Found this page useful?
Anonymous · no sign-inA quick, anonymous reaction — no account, no email. One per kind from your browser. The tally updates when the page is next refreshed, and it is only a rough count, never a safety rating or a measured number of people.
Compare with another server
Side by side: registry entry, our read-only session, the tools and the 18 classification fields. Same values as each page; no score.
Security testing
What did we test, and what did we leave out?
18 checks · features #1, #2
Open without sign-in
It accepted a session without any credential and lists tools whose names suggest they change data. We did not call them. No security score is given; a check we did not run is never counted as passed.
- Inventory: exercised
- Hidden instructions: exercised
- Real execution: not run · our policy
- Secret leak: not run · nothing to check it against
- Internal addresses: not run · our policy
- Unconfirmed changes: not run · our policy
- Bad input: not run · our policy
- Model requests: not run · nothing to check it against
- Sensitive questions: not run · nothing to check it against
- Folder boundary: not run · our policy
- Log leaks: not run · nothing to check it against
- Hidden content: not run · nothing to check it against
- Fake assistant turns: not run · an error was returned
- Token passthrough: not applicable
- Token audience: not applicable
- Sign-in redirect: not run · our policy
- Consent handling: not testable from outside
- Sign-in metadata: exercised
3 exercised13 not run (reason given)2 not applicable
Each check ends in exactly one state: exercised, not run (with the reason), or not applicable (with the reason). 3 of the 16 checks that apply to it were exercised. We do not publish security-check outcomes for named servers.
- 1Inventory
tool-listReads the declared tools, resources and prompts.exercised - 2Hidden instructions
description-poisoningLooks for hidden instructions in tool descriptions.exercised - 18Sign-in metadata
oauth-url-schemeChecks the published sign-in metadata for unsafe URLs.exercised
- 3Real execution
real-executionCalls a tool and checks what really happens.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy - 4Secret leak
canary-leakPlants a fake secret and checks whether it leaks.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against - 5Internal addresses
ssrfChecks whether a tool can be steered to internal addresses.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy - 6Unconfirmed changes
write-without-confirmationChecks whether tools that change data act without asking.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy - 7Bad input
error-handlingSends bad input and watches how the server answers.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy - 8Model requests
samplingChecks whether the server asks the client's model to act for it.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against - 9Sensitive questions
elicitation-sensitive-dataChecks whether the server asks users for sensitive data.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against - 10Folder boundary
root-boundaryChecks whether the server reaches outside the folders it was given.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy - 11Log leaks
logging-side-channelChecks whether log messages carry data they should not.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against - 12Hidden content
audience-hidingChecks resources that hide content from the user.This check needs content the server returns, and nothing was read or called.not run · nothing to check it against - 13Fake assistant turns
fake-assistant-turnChecks prompts that pose as the assistant's own words.The server returned an error when its prompts were read.not run · an error was returned - 16Sign-in redirect
open-redirectChecks the sign-in redirect for abuse.Testing the sign-in redirect means sending probes to the operator's sign-in service, which we do not do.not run · our policy - 17Consent handling
confused-deputyChecks consent handling when one service acts for another.Depends on the operator's own consent screen, which differs per server and cannot be tested from outside.not testable from outside
- 14Token passthrough
token-passthroughChecks whether the server forwards a user's token to other services.The server opened a session without sign-in, so there is no token flow to check.not applicable - 15Token audience
token-audience-validationChecks whether tokens meant for another service are accepted.The server opened a session without sign-in, so there is no token flow to check.not applicable
Source: our own test, 2026-10-24, mcp-runtime-engine@0.1.0. Which checks count and why follows our published scoring model.
What happened during the test?
Feature #8
The steps in order, as the test record holds them.
- 0 msStarted a read-only session with the server's remote endpoint
- 249 msConnected after 0 redirects. No credential was sent or needed.
- Read the inventory: 17 tools, 0 resources, 1 prompt.
- 951 msFinished: 3 checks exercised.
Reference
How is it classified?
18 fields
One value per field, each with its source. Fields written by AI models are marked. A field with no value says why.
“Not stated” means the source did not state it; “does not apply” means it does not apply to this kind of server; “our limit” means our own lookup failed. A linked value opens the directory filtered to the same value.
Cite or correct this page
Sources and corrections
Suggested citation
ProtocolProbe. “io.usefulapi/enginemailer: MCP server record.” Data checked 2026-10-24. https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/io.usefulapi/enginemailer
Figures are valid for the date shown. Our facts on this page are CC BY 4.0: reuse them with a link and the check date. Quoted text (the publisher’s descriptions, website quotes, tool names) is not ours to license.
As JSON: this record in the API · API documentation.
Badge for your README
[](https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/io.usefulapi/enginemailer)
It shows this server's record-check count: facts from public records, no tool called. It is not a security rating or a pass. It links here and updates after each data reload.
Something wrong, or is this yours?
If a fact here is wrong, tell us and we will re-check it. If you operate this server, you can run our checks on it yourself with the free self-test command; we call no server’s tools ourselves for anything shown here.
Write to hello@protocolprobe.com · corrections log · methodology