Skip to content
ProtocolProbe
Explore

MCP servers › one.clevsec › eu-compliance

MCP server · registry snapshot 2026-10-23 · last tested 2026-10-23

one.clevsec/eu-compliance

Deterministic, sourced EU compliance checks: NIS2, DORA, GDPR and the Cyber Resilience Act. — the publisher's description

1 of 2 record checks metRead-only · tools listed 2026-10-23Topic: security · AI-classifiedversion 1.2.1streamable HTTP28 tools

Summary

one.clevsec/eu-compliance is a remote MCP server listed in the official MCP registry at version 1.2.1. On 2026-10-23 ProtocolProbe connected to it in read-only mode and read its inventory: 28 tools, 0 resources and 0 prompts.

Record checks

1 of 2 record checks met · 7 do not apply

  • met: Registry entry is active and says how to run it
  • not met: Source repository link opens
  • not applicable: Repository is not archived
  • not applicable: Code pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our check
  • not applicable: Repository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)
  • not applicable: Package names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifier
  • not applicable: The version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawn
  • not applicable: npm package carries build provenance (attestation)
  • not applicable: No known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependencies
  • Not ranked by downloads: a remote server publishes no download figure
  • Not ranked by stars: no public GitHub repository

From public records, not a safety rating. Each check with its reason

Key facts

Runs
remote (hosted by the publisher)
Transport
streamable HTTP
Sign-in
none needed to open a session
Tools
28
Described as changing data
0 of 28 toolsAI-classified
Mainly works on
nothing outside itself: it only answers questionsAI-classified
Topic
securityAI-classified
Last tested
2026-10-23

Add to your client

How fresh this is

Live-tested
yes, a real session (not a text-only review)
Last tested
2026-10-23
Mode
read-only (no tool calls)
Latest version
1.2.1, published 2026-10-22 (registry, as of the 2026-10-23 snapshot)
First listed version
2026-10-20 (earliest version still in the registry; older removed versions would be earlier)
Version history
3 versions listed, 2026-10-20 to 2026-10-22; 3 in the 90 days before the 2026-10-23 snapshot.
Most recent 3 versions
  • 1.2.1 · 2026-10-22
  • 1.2.0 · 2026-10-20
  • 1.1.0 · 2026-10-20
(versions still listed in the registry only)
Registry data
snapshot 2026-10-23
Package and repository
checked 2026-10-23
Engine
mcp-runtime-engine@0.1.0 · sdk@1.32.0

Changes since the last refresh

New in the registry: not in the list of 2026-10-04, listed on 2026-10-23 with version 1.2.1 (published 2026-10-22).

Source: the official MCP Registry list on 2026-10-04 and on 2026-10-23.

What it is

What does this server offer?

Observed inventory
28tools
0resources
0prompts

What it mainly works on, as our AI model read its tool descriptions: nothing outside itself: it only answers questions.

None of its 28 tools are described as changing anything. For 10 the reading was uncertain, so no mark is shown.

  • reporting_deadlinesreads or searches

    “Use for any question about incident or breach reporting deadlines in the EU (for example 'how long do we have to report a breach / a cyber incident?').”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    1 input
    • regimesarray“Limit to these regimes; omit for all”
  • nis2_scope_checkreads or searches

    “Use for questions like 'does NIS2 apply to my company?', 'are we an essential or important entity?' or 'is a company of this size and sector in scope?'.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    9 inputs, 1 required
    • sectorstring“The Annex I or II sector of the entity's activity; omit if none applies”
    • staff_headcountnumberrequired“Staff in annual work units, including partner and linked enterprises”
    • annual_turnover_eurnumber
    • balance_sheet_total_eurnumber
    • provider_typestring“Special provider types covered regardless of size (Art.”
    • public_administrationstring
    • national_security_or_law_enforcementboolean“Public administration working in national security, public security, defence or law enforcement (Art.”
    • designated_by_member_stateboolean“Identified by the member state under Art.”
    • critical_entity_under_cerboolean“Identified as a critical entity under Directive (EU) 2022/2557”
  • nis2_gap_assessmentreads or searches

    “Use to assess how ready an organisation is for NIS2 cybersecurity requirements, or to find its gaps.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    1 input
    • answersobject“Question id to answer, e.g.”
  • dora_classify_incidentreads or searches

    “Use when a bank, insurer, investment firm, payment or crypto-asset firm or other financial entity has an IT outage, cyber attack or data incident and asks whether it must be reported under DORA.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    15 inputs
    • affects_critical_or_important_functionsboolean“ICT services or systems supporting critical or important functions are affected (Art.”
    • affects_authorised_or_supervised_servicesboolean“Financial services requiring authorisation or registration, or supervised, are affected (Art.”
    • successful_malicious_unauthorised_accessboolean“A successful, malicious and unauthorised access to network and information systems occurred that may result in data losses (Arts.”
    • affected_clients_percentnumber“Affected clients as % of all clients using the affected service”
    • affected_clients_countinteger
    • affected_counterparts_percentnumber“Affected financial counterparts as % of those active in the affected service”
    • affected_transactions_number_percentnumber“Affected transactions as % of the daily average number for the service”
    • affected_transactions_value_percentnumber“Affected transaction amount as % of the daily average value for the service”
    • relevant_clients_or_counterparts_affectedboolean“Clients or counterparts identified as relevant under Art.”
    • reputational_impactboolean“Media coverage, repetitive complaints, likely failure to meet regulatory requirements, or likely loss of clients with material impact (Art.”
    • duration_hoursnumber
    • critical_service_downtime_hoursnumber“Downtime of ICT services supporting critical or important functions”
    • member_states_with_impactinteger
    • data_impact_adverseboolean“Impact on availability, authenticity, integrity or confidentiality of data that harms business objectives or regulatory compliance (Art.”
    • costs_and_losses_eurnumber“Direct and indirect costs and losses per Art.”
  • dora_checklistreads or searches

    “Use for 'what does DORA require?', DORA compliance checklists or gap reviews.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    2 inputs
    • microenterpriseboolean“The financial entity is a microenterprise (DORA Art.”
    • simplified_frameworkboolean“The entity is listed in DORA Art.”
  • dora_gap_assessmentreads or searches

    “Use to assess how ready a financial entity is for DORA, or to find its gaps.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    1 input
    • answersobject“Question id to answer, e.g.”
  • gdpr_breach_decisionreads or searches

    “Use when a personal data breach has happened (data lost, stolen, sent to the wrong person, encrypted by ransomware, accessed without authorisation) to decide whether the GDPR requires notifying the s…”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    6 inputs, 1 required
    • rolestring“Controller decides why and how data are processed; a processor acts on its behalf”
    • riskstringrequired“Likely risk to people's rights and freedoms (EDPB Guidelines 9/2022): consider the type of breach, the sensitivity and volume of the data, how easily people ca…”
    • hours_since_awarenumber“Hours since the controller had a reasonable degree of certainty that a breach occurred”
    • data_unintelligibleboolean“The affected data were unintelligible to unauthorised people, e.g.”
    • subsequent_measures_remove_high_riskboolean“Measures taken since then ensure the high risk is no longer likely to materialise”
    • individual_contact_disproportionateboolean“Contacting each person would involve disproportionate effort, e.g.”
  • gdpr_fine_estimatereads or searches

    “Use for 'how big could a GDPR fine be?' or 'how are GDPR fines calculated?'.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    8 inputs, 2 required
    • annual_turnover_eurnumberrequired“Total worldwide annual turnover of the undertaking in the preceding financial year, in EUR”
    • infringement_tierstringrequired“83(4): controller/processor obligations such as security (Art.”
    • seriousnessstring“Seriousness per EDPB Guidelines 04/2022 para.”
    • people_affectedinteger
    • data_categoriesarray“basic contact data, financial, other personal (e.g.”
    • durationstring“short: under a month; medium: 1 to 12 months; long: over a year”
    • faultstring“low: measures in place but one failed; clear: a known risk not addressed; intent: intentional or against advice”
    • damagestring
  • gdpr_checklist_assessmentreads or searches

    “Use to check how far an organisation is with GDPR compliance, or to list what GDPR requires in practice.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    2 inputs
    • donearray“Ids of the items already in place”
    • not_applicablearray“Ids of optional items that do not apply (only items marked optional)”
  • gdpr_dpia_screeningreads or searches

    “Use when someone plans new processing of personal data (a new system, AI use, monitoring, profiling) and asks whether a data protection impact assessment is required or how risky it is.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    46 inputs
    • t1string“Will you systematically and extensively evaluate people by automated means (including profiling), and base decisions on it that have legal or similarly signifi…”
    • t2string“Will you process special category data (health, biometric, genetic, racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religion, trade union membership, sex life or …”
    • t3string“Will you systematically monitor a publicly accessible area on a large scale (for example CCTV in shops, stations or streets)?”
    • t4string“Is this type of processing on your supervisory authority's published list of operations that require a DPIA?”
    • c1string“Does the processing evaluate or score people (profiling or predicting their performance, finances, health, preferences, reliability, behaviour or location)?”
    • c2string“Does it involve automated decisions with legal or similarly significant effects (for example access to credit, a job or a service)?”
    • c3string“Does it involve systematic monitoring of people (for example online tracking, employee monitoring or CCTV)?”
    • c4string“Does it involve sensitive or highly personal data (special category or criminal data, financial data, location data or private communications)?”
    • c5string“Is the processing large-scale (many people, a large volume or range of data, a long duration or a wide geographic area)?”
    • c6string“Does it combine or match datasets from different sources in ways people would not expect?”
    • c7string“Does it concern vulnerable people (children, employees, patients, the elderly, or others in an unequal relationship with you)?”
    • c8string“Does it use innovative technology or a new way of using existing technology (for example AI, biometrics or IoT)?”
    • c9string“Could the processing itself prevent people from exercising a right or using a service or contract (for example credit screening that decides whether to offer a…”
    • x1string“Will personal data be transferred outside the EU/EEA (including remote access from outside the EEA)?”
    • proj_dataarray“Categories of personal data”
    • proj_subjectsarray“Categories of data subjects”
    • proj_legalstring“Legal basis for processing”
    • nec1string“Is the processing necessary to achieve the stated purpose, or could the purpose be achieved with less data?”
    • nec2string“Is the amount of data collected proportionate to the purpose?”
    • nec3string“Is the retention period limited to what is necessary?”
    • nec4string“Are data subjects adequately informed about the processing (transparency)?”
    • nec5string“Can data subjects exercise their rights (access, rectification, erasure, portability)?”
    • nec6string“If relying on consent, is it freely given, specific, informed, and withdrawable?”
    • nec7string“If relying on legitimate interest, has a balancing test been conducted?”
    • r1string“Risk of unauthorized access to personal data (data breach)”

    and 21 more not listed here.

  • privacy_notice_requirementsreads or searches

    “Use when writing or checking a privacy policy or privacy notice.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    6 inputs
    • sourcestring“data_subject: collected from the person (forms, accounts, cookies); other_source: from third parties, public sources or data brokers”
    • has_dpoboolean“A data protection officer is appointed”
    • relies_on_legitimate_interestsboolean
    • relies_on_consentboolean
    • transfers_outside_eeaboolean
    • automated_decisionsboolean“Solely automated decisions with legal or similarly significant effects, including profiling (Art.”
  • data_flow_record_checkreads or searches

    “Use when someone maps personal data flows or builds GDPR records of processing activities (ROPA, Art.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    1 input, 1 required
    • flowsarrayrequired
Show 16 more tools
  • cookie_consent_checkreads or searches

    “Use when someone asks whether their cookie banner or cookie consent is compliant in the EU (ePrivacy Art.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    1 input
    • answersobject“Item id to answer, e.g.”
  • cra_reporting_checkreads or searches

    “Use when a manufacturer of hardware or software sold in the EU learns of an actively exploited vulnerability or a security incident in its product.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    5 inputs, 1 required
    • eventstringrequired“actively_exploited_vulnerability: reliable evidence that a malicious actor exploited it; severe_incident: an incident affecting the product's security”
    • is_manufacturerboolean“Develops or manufactures the product, or has it designed or made, and markets it under its own name or trademark”
    • product_with_digital_elementsboolean“Software or hardware product (and its remote data processing) made available in the EU whose intended or foreseeable use includes a data connection to a device…”
    • affects_data_or_functions_protectionboolean“Severe incident test, Art.”
    • malicious_codeboolean“Severe incident test, Art.”
  • iso27001_gap_assessmentreads or searches

    “Use to check how close an organisation is to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification, or to list the Annex A controls in practice.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    1 input
    • answersobject“Control question id to status, e.g.”
  • vendor_risk_assessmentreads or searches

    “Use when an organisation evaluates a supplier, SaaS or ICT provider (vendor due diligence, third-party risk, supply chain security under NIS2 Art.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    29 inputs
    • vendorTypestring“Type of service”
    • dataAccessarray“What data will this vendor access?”
    • criticalitystring“How critical is this vendor to your operations?”
    • regimesarray“Which of these apply to your organization?”
    • sec1string“Does the vendor hold relevant security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2, etc.)?”
    • sec2string“Does the vendor have a documented information security policy?”
    • sec3string“Does the vendor encrypt data at rest and in transit?”
    • sec4string“Does the vendor enforce multi-factor authentication?”
    • sec5string“Does the vendor conduct regular penetration testing?”
    • sec6string“Does the vendor have a vulnerability management program?”
    • sec7string“Does the vendor perform background checks on employees with data access?”
    • inc1string“Does the vendor have a documented incident response plan?”
    • inc2string“Will the vendor notify you of security incidents within 24-48 hours?”
    • inc3string“Has the vendor experienced any data breaches in the last 3 years?”
    • inc4string“Does the vendor conduct incident response exercises/tabletop tests?”
    • com1string“Is the vendor compliant with GDPR (if processing EU personal data)?”
    • com2string“Will the vendor sign a Data Processing Agreement?”
    • com3string“Does the vendor provide right-to-audit or access to audit reports?”
    • com4string“Does the vendor's contract include security requirements and SLAs?”
    • com5string“Does the vendor have adequate insurance coverage (cyber liability)?”
    • bcp1string“Does the vendor have a business continuity / disaster recovery plan?”
    • bcp2string“Does the vendor offer a defined SLA with uptime guarantees?”
    • bcp3string“Can data be exported/migrated if you terminate the relationship?”
    • bcp4string“Does the vendor have geographic redundancy for critical services?”
    • bcp5string“Is the vendor financially stable (no signs of distress)?”

    and 4 more not listed here.

  • maturity_assessmentreads or searches

    “Use to measure an organisation's cybersecurity maturity or to benchmark it against NIST CSF 2.0.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    1 input
    • answersobject“Question id to maturity level 1-5, e.g.”
  • cyber_risk_scorereads or searches

    “Use for a quick view of a small organisation's cyber risk ('how secure are we?', 'what is our cyber risk score?').”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    1 input
    • answersobject“Question id to answer, e.g.”
  • nis2_remediation_plan

    “Use after nis2_gap_assessment when the user wants a plan to close their NIS2 gaps.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    1 input, 1 required
    • answersobjectrequired“Question id to answer, e.g.”
  • dora_remediation_plan

    “Use after dora_gap_assessment when the user wants a plan to close their DORA gaps.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    1 input, 1 required
    • answersobjectrequired“Question id to answer, e.g.”
  • gdpr_remediation_plan

    “Use after gdpr_checklist_assessment when the user wants a plan to close their GDPR gaps.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    2 inputs
    • donearray“Ids of the items already in place”
    • not_applicablearray“Ids of optional items that do not apply (only items marked optional)”
  • gdpr_dpia_report

    “Use after gdpr_dpia_screening when the user needs the DPIA worked out: a risk register linking each high or medium risk to its measures with coverage and indicative residual risk, and every gap (lega…”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    46 inputs
    • t1string“Will you systematically and extensively evaluate people by automated means (including profiling), and base decisions on it that have legal or similarly signifi…”
    • t2string“Will you process special category data (health, biometric, genetic, racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religion, trade union membership, sex life or …”
    • t3string“Will you systematically monitor a publicly accessible area on a large scale (for example CCTV in shops, stations or streets)?”
    • t4string“Is this type of processing on your supervisory authority's published list of operations that require a DPIA?”
    • c1string“Does the processing evaluate or score people (profiling or predicting their performance, finances, health, preferences, reliability, behaviour or location)?”
    • c2string“Does it involve automated decisions with legal or similarly significant effects (for example access to credit, a job or a service)?”
    • c3string“Does it involve systematic monitoring of people (for example online tracking, employee monitoring or CCTV)?”
    • c4string“Does it involve sensitive or highly personal data (special category or criminal data, financial data, location data or private communications)?”
    • c5string“Is the processing large-scale (many people, a large volume or range of data, a long duration or a wide geographic area)?”
    • c6string“Does it combine or match datasets from different sources in ways people would not expect?”
    • c7string“Does it concern vulnerable people (children, employees, patients, the elderly, or others in an unequal relationship with you)?”
    • c8string“Does it use innovative technology or a new way of using existing technology (for example AI, biometrics or IoT)?”
    • c9string“Could the processing itself prevent people from exercising a right or using a service or contract (for example credit screening that decides whether to offer a…”
    • x1string“Will personal data be transferred outside the EU/EEA (including remote access from outside the EEA)?”
    • proj_dataarray“Categories of personal data”
    • proj_subjectsarray“Categories of data subjects”
    • proj_legalstring“Legal basis for processing”
    • nec1string“Is the processing necessary to achieve the stated purpose, or could the purpose be achieved with less data?”
    • nec2string“Is the amount of data collected proportionate to the purpose?”
    • nec3string“Is the retention period limited to what is necessary?”
    • nec4string“Are data subjects adequately informed about the processing (transparency)?”
    • nec5string“Can data subjects exercise their rights (access, rectification, erasure, portability)?”
    • nec6string“If relying on consent, is it freely given, specific, informed, and withdrawable?”
    • nec7string“If relying on legitimate interest, has a balancing test been conducted?”
    • r1string“Risk of unauthorized access to personal data (data breach)”

    and 21 more not listed here.

  • data_flow_review

    “Use after data_flow_record_check for a compliance review of each personal data flow: legal basis, special category and children's data, consent and legitimate interest records, retention, internation…”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    1 input, 1 required
    • flowsarrayrequired
  • cookie_consent_fix_plan

    “Use after cookie_consent_check when the user wants to fix their cookie consent.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    1 input, 1 required
    • answersobjectrequired“Item id to answer, e.g.”
  • iso27001_remediation_plan

    “Use after iso27001_gap_assessment when the user wants a plan towards ISO/IEC 27001 certification.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    1 input, 1 required
    • answersobjectrequired“Control question id to status, e.g.”
  • vendor_due_diligence_plan

    “Use after vendor_risk_assessment when the user needs to act on a vendor's gaps.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    29 inputs
    • vendorTypestring“Type of service”
    • dataAccessarray“What data will this vendor access?”
    • criticalitystring“How critical is this vendor to your operations?”
    • regimesarray“Which of these apply to your organization?”
    • sec1string“Does the vendor hold relevant security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2, etc.)?”
    • sec2string“Does the vendor have a documented information security policy?”
    • sec3string“Does the vendor encrypt data at rest and in transit?”
    • sec4string“Does the vendor enforce multi-factor authentication?”
    • sec5string“Does the vendor conduct regular penetration testing?”
    • sec6string“Does the vendor have a vulnerability management program?”
    • sec7string“Does the vendor perform background checks on employees with data access?”
    • inc1string“Does the vendor have a documented incident response plan?”
    • inc2string“Will the vendor notify you of security incidents within 24-48 hours?”
    • inc3string“Has the vendor experienced any data breaches in the last 3 years?”
    • inc4string“Does the vendor conduct incident response exercises/tabletop tests?”
    • com1string“Is the vendor compliant with GDPR (if processing EU personal data)?”
    • com2string“Will the vendor sign a Data Processing Agreement?”
    • com3string“Does the vendor provide right-to-audit or access to audit reports?”
    • com4string“Does the vendor's contract include security requirements and SLAs?”
    • com5string“Does the vendor have adequate insurance coverage (cyber liability)?”
    • bcp1string“Does the vendor have a business continuity / disaster recovery plan?”
    • bcp2string“Does the vendor offer a defined SLA with uptime guarantees?”
    • bcp3string“Can data be exported/migrated if you terminate the relationship?”
    • bcp4string“Does the vendor have geographic redundancy for critical services?”
    • bcp5string“Is the vendor financially stable (no signs of distress)?”

    and 4 more not listed here.

  • maturity_improvement_plan

    “Use after maturity_assessment when the user wants to raise their maturity.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    2 inputs, 1 required
    • answersobjectrequired“Question id to maturity level 1-5, e.g.”
    • target_levelinteger
  • cyber_risk_action_plan

    “Use after cyber_risk_score when the user wants to reduce their risk.”

    Publisher declares: read-only yes · destructive no · idempotent yes · open-world no

    1 input, 1 required
    • answersobjectrequired“Question id to answer, e.g.”

Each quoted sentence is the first sentence of the publisher’s own description. The kind of tool and the “changes data” mark are our AI model’s reading of that description, not something we tested: two differently worded runs had to agree, otherwise no label is shown, and nobody has checked them by hand. A tool without the “changes data” mark is described as only reading, searching or calculating, or the two runs did not agree. No tool was called. Read the publisher’s full description before relying on it. “Publisher declares” lists the hints the server itself sends with the tool (MCP annotations: read-only, destructive, idempotent, open-world); they are the publisher's claims, not checked by us. Inputs are the parameters in the tool's own input schema: name, declared type, whether it is required, and the first sentence of its description. Read 2026-10-23.

How well are its tools described?

Features #4 and #5

How clearly this server's own tool descriptions say what a tool does, and how consistent its tool list is. The first part is an AI model's yes/no reading of each description; the second part is counted. We do not turn it into a grade.

Descriptions

AI reading of each description

Says what the tool does
100% of 28 tools
Says what it returns
100% of 28 tools
States limits, defaults or errors
0% of 28 tools
Says when to use it
100% of 28 tools
Items covered per tool
3.0 of 4 on average

Counted from the listing

Parameters with a description
94% of 221
Tools with a description
100% of 28
Typical description length
353 characters

The tool set

Counted from the listing

Tools
28
Size of the list
about 14,164 tokens for an agent to load (characters ÷ 4)
Naming
28 of 28 names use snake_case

AI reading: easy to mix up

No pair found.

The AI items cover 28 of 28 tools: for a tool where two differently worded runs disagreed, that item is left out. They were not checked by hand, and no tool was called. “Easy to mix up” means two tools whose names or descriptions overlap without saying how they differ; the AI found none. We do not rate whether the tool set is complete or whether side effects are spelled out, because our AI reading of those was not reliable enough.

How do I add it to my client?

Config from the registry entry

From the remote endpoint (Streamable HTTP)

We connected to this URL on 2026-10-23 (a read-only session: no tool was called).

Add to CursorAn install link in the format Cursor documents, holding the Cursor config below.

Claude Desktop or claude.ai
Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector, then paste:
https://mcp.clevsec.one/mcp
Cursor · .cursor/mcp.json in a project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "eu-compliance": {
      "url": "https://mcp.clevsec.one/mcp"
    }
  }
}
VS Code · .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "eu-compliance": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.clevsec.one/mcp"
    }
  }
}
VS Code (command line) · Bash or zsh terminal (macOS, Linux)
code --add-mcp '{"name":"eu-compliance","type":"http","url":"https://mcp.clevsec.one/mcp"}'
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http eu-compliance https://mcp.clevsec.one/mcp
Try it in the MCP Inspector · runs on your machine, opens in your browser · Node 22.19+
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector@2.11.0 --server-url https://mcp.clevsec.one/mcp --transport http
  • The server runs on the operator's infrastructure; it may ask you to sign in when you first connect.
  • The MCP Inspector lists the server's tools, resources and prompts; a tool you call there runs for real.

Built from the server's registry entry with each client's documented format (checked 2026-10-14; the Cursor link and the VS Code command 2026-10-19; the MCP Inspector command 2026-10-21). Values in < > are yours to fill in; this page never contains a key. Where the server needs a setting the entry does not declare, it can still fail to start.

Does the registry listing match what we found?

Feature #6

The registry verifies a package once, when it is published, and does not re-check it. A difference below is about the listing, not a judgement of the publisher.

Registry saysWe foundResultSource · date
Remote endpoint mcp.clevsec.one/mcpSession openedmatchesour test · 2026-10-23
No credential declared as requiredOpened a session without any credentialmatchesour test · 2026-10-23

Choosing

Record checks

Public records · not a safety rating

1 of 2 record checks met · 7 do not apply

  • Not ranked by downloads: a remote server publishes no download figure
  • Not ranked by stars: no public GitHub repository
  • MetRegistry entry is active and says how to run itActive, with a package or a remote address.
  • Not metSource repository link opensThe registry entry gives no repository link.
  • Does not applyRepository is not archivedNo public GitHub repository to read.
  • Does not applyCode pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our checkNo public GitHub repository to read.
  • Does not applyRepository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)No public GitHub repository to read.
  • Does not applyPackage names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifierRemote server: it ships no package.
  • Does not applyThe version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawnRemote server: it ships no package.
  • Does not applynpm package carries build provenance (attestation)Remote server: it ships no package.
  • Does not applyNo known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependenciesRemote server: it ships no package.

Read from public records only: the registry entry, npm/PyPI, GitHub and advisory databases, checked 2026-10-23. No tool was called. Only “met” and “not met” are counted, so the total differs between servers; a check that does not apply or that we could not run is listed, never counted against it. It is not a safety rating. How each check works · Leaderboards

Common questions about one.clevsec/eu-compliance

Answered from the data above

Does one.clevsec/eu-compliance need an API key or sign-in?

It opened a session without any credential on 2026-10-23. The registry entry declares no required credential; no declaration is not a guarantee.

Has one.clevsec/eu-compliance been security tested?

Partly. 3 of the 15 checks that apply to it were exercised. We connected and read what the server declares, but did not call its tools: ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes. This is our choice, not a block by the server. No security verdict is published before verification.

What can one.clevsec/eu-compliance do?

It lists 28 tools. In our AI model's reading of their descriptions (two runs had to agree, nobody checked it by hand), they include tools that read or search. We did not call any tool, so this describes the text, not the behaviour.

Can one.clevsec/eu-compliance change or delete data?

None of its 28 tools is described as changing anything (our AI model's reading of the descriptions; nobody checked it by hand). We did not call any tool.

Found this page useful?

Anonymous · no sign-in

A quick, anonymous reaction — no account, no email. One per kind from your browser. The tally updates when the page is next refreshed, and it is only a rough count, never a safety rating or a measured number of people.

Similar servers

Same topic · AI-read

Active servers whose topic is also “security” and that have at least one tool of the same kind; most kinds in common first, then most GitHub stars. The topic and the tool kinds are an AI model's reading of the publishers' descriptions, not checked by hand. Similar is not a recommendation.

Compare with another server

Side by side: registry entry, our read-only session, the tools and the 18 classification fields. Same values as each page; no score.

Security testing

What did we test, and what did we leave out?

18 checks · features #1, #2

Not probed (we call no server's tools)

We connected and read what the server declares, but did not call its tools: ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes. This is our choice, not a block by the server. No security score is given; a check we did not run is never counted as passed.

The 18 checks at a glanceour test · 2026-10-23
  1. Inventory: exercised
  2. Hidden instructions: exercised
  3. Real execution: not run · our policy
  4. Secret leak: not run · nothing to check it against
  5. Internal addresses: not run · our policy
  6. Unconfirmed changes: not run · our policy
  7. Bad input: not run · our policy
  8. Model requests: not run · nothing to check it against
  9. Sensitive questions: not run · nothing to check it against
  10. Folder boundary: not run · our policy
  11. Log leaks: not run · nothing to check it against
  12. Hidden content: not run · nothing to check it against
  13. Fake assistant turns: not applicable
  14. Token passthrough: not applicable
  15. Token audience: not applicable
  16. Sign-in redirect: not run · our policy
  17. Consent handling: not testable from outside
  18. Sign-in metadata: exercised

3 exercised12 not run (reason given)3 not applicable

Each check ends in exactly one state: exercised, not run (with the reason), or not applicable (with the reason). 3 of the 15 checks that apply to it were exercised. We do not publish security-check outcomes for named servers.

Exercised · 3
  • 1Inventory
    tool-list    Reads the declared tools, resources and prompts.exercised
  • 2Hidden instructions
    description-poisoning    Looks for hidden instructions in tool descriptions.exercised
  • 18Sign-in metadata
    oauth-url-scheme    Checks the published sign-in metadata for unsafe URLs.exercised
Not run, with the reason · 12
  • 3Real execution
    real-execution    Calls a tool and checks what really happens.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy
  • 4Secret leak
    canary-leak    Plants a fake secret and checks whether it leaks.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against
  • 5Internal addresses
    ssrf    Checks whether a tool can be steered to internal addresses.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy
  • 6Unconfirmed changes
    write-without-confirmation    Checks whether tools that change data act without asking.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy
  • 7Bad input
    error-handling    Sends bad input and watches how the server answers.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy
  • 8Model requests
    sampling    Checks whether the server asks the client's model to act for it.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against
  • 9Sensitive questions
    elicitation-sensitive-data    Checks whether the server asks users for sensitive data.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against
  • 10Folder boundary
    root-boundary    Checks whether the server reaches outside the folders it was given.This check calls the server's tools. ProtocolProbe calls no server's tools for anything it publishes; an operator can run this check on their own server with our self-test command.not run · our policy
  • 11Log leaks
    logging-side-channel    Checks whether log messages carry data they should not.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against
  • 12Hidden content
    audience-hiding    Checks resources that hide content from the user.This check needs content the server returns, and nothing was read or called.not run · nothing to check it against
  • 16Sign-in redirect
    open-redirect    Checks the sign-in redirect for abuse.Testing the sign-in redirect means sending probes to the operator's sign-in service, which we do not do.not run · our policy
  • 17Consent handling
    confused-deputy    Checks consent handling when one service acts for another.Depends on the operator's own consent screen, which differs per server and cannot be tested from outside.not testable from outside
Does not apply to this server · 3
  • 13Fake assistant turns
    fake-assistant-turn    Checks prompts that pose as the assistant's own words.The server exposes no prompts.not applicable
  • 14Token passthrough
    token-passthrough    Checks whether the server forwards a user's token to other services.The server opened a session without sign-in, so there is no token flow to check.not applicable
  • 15Token audience
    token-audience-validation    Checks whether tokens meant for another service are accepted.The server opened a session without sign-in, so there is no token flow to check.not applicable

Source: our own test, 2026-10-23, mcp-runtime-engine@0.1.0. Which checks count and why follows our published scoring model.

What happened during the test?

Feature #8

The steps in order, as the test record holds them.

  1. 0 msStarted a read-only session with the server's remote endpoint
  2. 409 msConnected after 0 redirects. No credential was sent or needed.
  3. Read the inventory: 28 tools, 0 resources, 0 prompts.
  4. 1,171 msFinished: 3 checks exercised.

Reference

How is it classified?

18 fields

One value per field, each with its source. Fields written by AI models are marked. A field with no value says why.

TopicAI-classified
security
AI-classified · 2026-10-23
Pricing modelAI-classified
no value
No value: the AI answer was held back because the quoted text did not clearly support it.
Programming language
does not apply
no existing GitHub repository (server declares no repository link, so there is nothing to fetch)
Hosting type
remote (hosted by the publisher)
registry · 2026-10-23
MCP capability
tools
our test · 2026-10-23
Transport
streamable HTTP
registry · 2026-10-23
Required credentials
none declared
registry · no declaration is not a guarantee
Package registry
does not apply
remote-only server: no package is shipped, so there is no package registry
Freshness
0–30 days
registry updatedAt · 2026-10-23
Lifecycle status
active
registry · 2026-10-23
License class
does not apply
remote-only server: ships no package, so there is nothing to look up in a package registry
Integrity hash
does not apply
remote-only server: ships no package, so there is nothing to look up in a package registry
Signature / provenance
does not apply
remote-only server: ships no package, so there is nothing to look up in a package registry
Dependency advisories
does not apply
ships no package, so there are no dependencies to audit
Popularity
does not apply
remote-only server: ships no package, so there is nothing to look up in a package registry
Publisher signals
not stated
no readable GitHub owner to describe
Maintenance
does not apply
server declares no repository link, so there is nothing to fetch
Environment
the publisher's infrastructure
where it runs, from the hosting type

“Not stated” means the source did not state it; “does not apply” means it does not apply to this kind of server; “our limit” means our own lookup failed. A linked value opens the directory filtered to the same value.

Cite or correct this page

Sources and corrections

Suggested citation

ProtocolProbe. “one.clevsec/eu-compliance: MCP server record.” Data checked 2026-10-23. https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/one.clevsec/eu-compliance

Figures are valid for the date shown. Our facts on this page are CC BY 4.0: reuse them with a link and the check date. Quoted text (the publisher’s descriptions, website quotes, tool names) is not ours to license.

As JSON: this record in the API · API documentation.

Badge for your README

ProtocolProbe: 1 of 2 record checks met

[![ProtocolProbe](https://protocolprobe.com/api/v1/badge/one.clevsec/eu-compliance)](https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/one.clevsec/eu-compliance)

It shows this server's record-check count: facts from public records, no tool called. It is not a security rating or a pass. It links here and updates after each data reload.

Something wrong, or is this yours?

If a fact here is wrong, tell us and we will re-check it. If you operate this server, you can run our checks on it yourself with the free self-test command; we call no server’s tools ourselves for anything shown here.

Write to hello@protocolprobe.com · corrections log · methodology