Skip to content
ProtocolProbe
Explore

MCP servers › tech.kyanitelabs › epoch

MCP server · registry snapshot 2026-10-23

tech.kyanitelabs/epoch

Epoch time estimation MCP server for PERT, COCOMO, Monte Carlo, calibration, cost, and risk. — the publisher's description

4 of 5 record checks metTopic: developer-tools · AI-classifiedPricing: open-source · AI-classifiedversion 0.5.2TypeScript

Summary

tech.kyanitelabs/epoch is an MCP server listed in the official MCP registry at version 0.5.2.

Record checks

4 of 5 record checks met · 4 do not apply

  • not met: Registry entry is active and says how to run it
  • met: Source repository link opens
  • met: Repository is not archived
  • met: Code pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our check
  • met: Repository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)
  • not applicable: Package names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifier
  • not applicable: The version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawn
  • not applicable: npm package carries build provenance (attestation)
  • not applicable: No known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependencies
  • Not ranked by downloads: not an npm or PyPI package
  • Not ranked by stars: 8 stars (ranked from 10)

From public records, not a safety rating. Each check with its reason · Is it safe to install?

Key facts

Repository
public
Topic
developer-toolsAI-classified
Pricing
open-sourceAI-classified
Last tested
not tested

How fresh this is

Live-tested
no
Last tested
not tested
Latest version
0.5.2, published 2026-10-13 (registry, as of the 2026-10-23 snapshot)
First listed version
2026-10-13 (earliest version still in the registry; older removed versions would be earlier)
Registry data
snapshot 2026-10-23
Package and repository
checked 2026-10-23

Changes since the last refresh

New in the registry: not in the list of 2026-10-04, listed on 2026-10-23 with version 0.5.2 (published 2026-10-13).

Source: the official MCP Registry list on 2026-10-04 and on 2026-10-23.

What it is

Does the registry listing match what we found?

Feature #6

The registry verifies a package once, when it is published, and does not re-check it. A difference below is about the listing, not a judgement of the publisher.

Registry saysWe foundResultSource · date
Repository github.com/KyaniteLabs/EpochOpens publiclymatchesapi.github.com · 2026-10-23

Who made it?

Feature #7 · lineage

Facts about the publisher. We do not turn them into a trust score.

Namespace
tech.kyanitelabs · 4 servers
GitHub owner
an organization (KyaniteLabs)
Repository
github.com/KyaniteLabs/Epoch
Stars
8
Repository age
91–180 days
Last push
0–30 days ago
Archived
no
Security policy
SECURITY.md

Source: the registry entry and api.github.com · 2026-10-23; security policy read from GitHub · 2026-10-23.

Publish this server? Run these checks against it yourself before release, from your own machine: a server the command starts, or your own server at its URL after a one-time proof that you control it: npx protocolprobe-selftest.

Choosing

Record checks

Public records · not a safety rating

4 of 5 record checks met · 4 do not apply

  • Not ranked by downloads: not an npm or PyPI package
  • Not ranked by stars: 8 stars (ranked from 10)
  • Not metRegistry entry is active and says how to run itThe entry lists no package and no remote address, so a client cannot run it.
  • MetSource repository link opensThe linked GitHub repository is public.
  • MetRepository is not archivedNot archived.
  • MetCode pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our checkLast push 0-30 days before our check.
  • MetRepository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)SECURITY.md found.
  • Does not applyPackage names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifierThe entry lists no package.
  • Does not applyThe version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawnThe entry lists no package.
  • Does not applynpm package carries build provenance (attestation)The entry lists no package.
  • Does not applyNo known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependenciesThe entry lists no package.

Read from public records only: the registry entry, npm/PyPI, GitHub and advisory databases, checked 2026-10-23. No tool was called. Only “met” and “not met” are counted, so the total differs between servers; a check that does not apply or that we could not run is listed, never counted against it. It is not a safety rating. How each check works · Leaderboards

Common questions about tech.kyanitelabs/epoch

Answered from the data above

Is tech.kyanitelabs/epoch safe to install?

We do not rate servers as safe or unsafe. 4 of its 5 applicable record checks are met (facts from public records, each listed on this page). What the records show: Its source repository opens publicly. Its repository had a push in the last 90 days. These are facts with their sources on this page, not a safety guarantee, and we did not run its tools.

Is tech.kyanitelabs/epoch free to use?

Its website (kyanitelabs.github.io/Epoch/) describes a open-source pricing model. This is an AI-classified reading of the page on 2026-10-23, so check the page itself before relying on it.

Has tech.kyanitelabs/epoch been security tested?

Not yet. The registry entry declares no package and no remote endpoint, so there is nothing to run.

Does tech.kyanitelabs/epoch publish a security policy?

Yes: its repository has a public security policy (github.com/kyanitelabs/epoch/blob/HEAD/SECURITY.md). That is the publisher's statement, not permission for us to test the server, and we call none of its tools.

Where is the source code of tech.kyanitelabs/epoch?

In github.com/KyaniteLabs/Epoch, which opens publicly.

Found this page useful?

Anonymous · no sign-in

A quick, anonymous reaction — no account, no email. One per kind from your browser. The tally updates when the page is next refreshed, and it is only a rough count, never a safety rating or a measured number of people.

Similar servers

Same topic · AI-read

Active servers whose topic is also “developer-tools”, most GitHub stars first. The topic and the tool kinds are an AI model's reading of the publishers' descriptions, not checked by hand. Similar is not a recommendation.

Compare with another server

Side by side: registry entry, our read-only session, the tools and the 18 classification fields. Same values as each page; no score.

Security testing

Has it been tested?

Feature #1

The registry entry declares no package and no remote endpoint, so there is nothing to run. — the server's own choice

Reference

How is it classified?

18 fields

One value per field, each with its source. Fields written by AI models are marked. A field with no value says why.

TopicAI-classified
developer-tools
AI-classified (Gemini + Claude agreed) · 2026-10-23
Pricing modelAI-classified
open-source
read from kyanitelabs.github.io/Epoch/ · 2026-10-23

“Open Source · Apache-2.0 · v0.5.2”

Programming language
TypeScript
api.github.com · 2026-10-23
Hosting type
not stated
entry declares neither packages[] nor remotes[], so no delivery method is stated
MCP capability
not checked
not read (no session)
Transport
not stated
no packages[] or remotes[] to carry a transport
Required credentials
not stated
no packages[] or remotes[] to carry credential declarations
Package registry
not stated
no packages[] and no remotes[], so no delivery method is stated
Freshness
0–30 days
registry updatedAt · 2026-10-23
Lifecycle status
active
registry · 2026-10-23
License class
not stated
server declares no packages[], so no package registry can be queried
Integrity hash
not stated
server declares no packages[], so no package registry can be queried
Signature / provenance
not stated
server declares no packages[], so no package registry can be queried
Dependency advisories
does not apply
ships no package, so there are no dependencies to audit
Popularity
not stated
server declares no packages[], so no package registry can be queried
Publisher signals
owner: an organization · repository age: 91–180 days · stars: 0–9
api.github.com · 2026-10-23
Maintenance
active
api.github.com · 2026-10-23
Environment
not stated
entry declares neither packages[] nor remotes[], so no delivery method is stated

“Not stated” means the source did not state it; “does not apply” means it does not apply to this kind of server; “our limit” means our own lookup failed. A linked value opens the directory filtered to the same value.

Cite or correct this page

Sources and corrections

Suggested citation

ProtocolProbe. “tech.kyanitelabs/epoch: MCP server record.” Data checked 2026-10-23. https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/tech.kyanitelabs/epoch

Figures are valid for the date shown. Our facts on this page are CC BY 4.0: reuse them with a link and the check date. Quoted text (the publisher’s descriptions, website quotes, tool names) is not ours to license.

As JSON: this record in the API · API documentation.

Badge for your README

ProtocolProbe: 4 of 5 record checks met

[![ProtocolProbe](https://protocolprobe.com/api/v1/badge/tech.kyanitelabs/epoch)](https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/tech.kyanitelabs/epoch)

It shows this server's record-check count: facts from public records, no tool called. It is not a security rating or a pass. It links here and updates after each data reload.

Something wrong, or is this yours?

If a fact here is wrong, tell us and we will re-check it. If you operate this server, you can run our checks on it yourself with the free self-test command; we call no server’s tools ourselves for anything shown here.

Write to hello@protocolprobe.com · corrections log · methodology