MCP servers › io.github.MRFrazer25 › vulnerability-exposure-mcp
MCP server · registry snapshot 2026-11-01 · last checked 2026-11-01
io.github.MRFrazer25/vulnerability-exposure-mcp
Vulnerability Exposure — the publisher's title
by MRFrazer25 · GitHub account (the registry's namespace rule)repository: same ownerSource ↗PyPI ↗
Confirmed vulnerabilities and exposure for IPs, domains and software versions (NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS) — the publisher's description
Summary
io.github.MRFrazer25/vulnerability-exposure-mcp is a local MCP server listed in the official MCP registry at version 1.2.0, under the namespace of the GitHub account MRFrazer25. Its linked repository, github.com/MRFrazer25/Vulnerability-Exposure-MCP, belongs to the same GitHub account.
Record checks
7 of 7 record checks met · 1 does not apply · 1 not checked
- met: Registry entry is active and says how to run it
- met: Source repository link opens
- met: Repository is not archived
- met: Code pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our check
- met: Repository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)
- met: Package names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifier
- met: The version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawn
- not applicable: npm package carries build provenance (attestation)
- not checked: No known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependencies
- #17,470 of 18,055 packages by monthly downloads, tied with 585 others
- Not ranked by stars: 1 star (ranked from 10)
From public records, not a safety rating. Each check with its reason · Is it safe to install?
Operate this server? Correct a fact · README badge · Run the checks yourself
Key facts
- Runs
- local package
- Transport
- standard input/output
- Your own values
- none declared (not a guarantee)
- Package
- PyPI · listed version current
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- public
- Last tested
- not tested
Tool list
Not read: It could be started, but has not been tested; we call no server's tools for anything we publish. This is our limit, not the server's. So there is no tool-list size and no result from the three APIs.
How fresh this is
- Live-tested
- no
- Last tested
- not tested
- Latest version
- 1.2.0, published 2026-11-01 (registry, as of the 2026-11-01 snapshot)
- First listed version
- 2026-10-25 (earliest version still in the registry; older removed versions would be earlier)
- Version history
- 4 versions listed, 2026-10-25 to 2026-11-01; 4 in the 90 days before the 2026-11-01 snapshot.(versions still listed in the registry only)
Most recent 4 versions
1.2.0· 2026-11-011.1.0· 2026-10-311.0.1· 2026-10-291.0.0· 2026-10-25
- Registry data
- snapshot 2026-11-01
- Package and repository
- checked 2026-11-01
Dead or stale signals
None found in the records we hold
Looked for and not found: deprecated in the registry; listed version cannot be installed or is withdrawn; repository link does not open; repository archived; no push in over 365 days. Each line is a dated fact from a public record. It does not say whether the server still works, and a record can change after the date shown.
Changes since the last refresh
Version 1.1.0 (published 2026-10-31) → 1.2.0 (published 2026-11-01), between the registry lists of 2026-10-31 and 2026-11-01.
The publisher’s GitHub release note for v1.2.0 (“1.2.0”), published 2026-11-01.
Read the release note (the publisher’s text, shown as plain text, cut at 4,000 characters)
### Added
- `watchlist`: save the software you run once (typed or pasted, as for `am_i_affected`), and `check` reports only what changed since the last check: newly confirmed CVEs, CVEs newly added to CISA KEV, EPSS jumps of 10 points or more, and changed verdicts. A lookup that fails keeps the last good result to compare with. The list is one file in your own config folder, readable only by you.
- `vulnerability-exposure-mcp watch` runs the same check from a terminal and prints what changed, so Task Scheduler, cron or launchd can run it daily with no server. The README shows how for each OS.
- An opt-in disk cache (`VULN_EXPOSURE_CACHE=on`) for public data-source responses: NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS, Exploit-DB, CVE.org, endoflife.date and OSV advisories. Repeat checks in a new session are much faster (a Jenkins check went from 4 s to 0.7 s) and use less of NVD's rate limit. It's off by default, never stores keys or results, lives in the user's own cache folder (readable only by them), expires each entry after hours, is capped at 200 MB, and `vulnerability-exposure-mcp cache status` / `cache clear` show and empty it. Each file is signed with a key kept in your OS credential store, so a file that was edited or moved is fetched again rather than trusted, and the KEV catalog is kept for an hour, so a CVE CISA adds shows up the same morning.
### Changed
- `check_report` also checks claims about the host against its lookups: open ports, VirusTotal and AbuseIPDB counts, a Spamhaus listing and host names no lookup returned. It catches "no public exploit" when Exploit-DB has one, checks "X isn't in KEV, but Y is" clause by clause, and flags a table's fix cell that leaves out "after". A product named with a version no lookup returned ("runs OpenSSH 9.6p1") is flagged wherever it sits, and so is a sentence quoting a source that returned nothing ("GreyNoise shows it doesn't scan" when GreyNoise hit its limit), unless it says the source wasn't checked.
- CVEs NVD says apply only on a specific platform or with a component (CVE-2024-4577: PHP on Windows) say so, with the platform. A build the input says runs on Linux or Unix (an Ubuntu package, "(Ubuntu)" in a banner) has Windows-only CVEs ruled out, whether you ask about every CVE or one. Key facts mark a confirmed KEV or ransomware CVE that needs a platform. These rules were being dropped when NVD records were trimmed.
- The most likely confirmed CVEs carry their EPSS trend over the last 30 days, and ones whose exploitation likelihood jumped are listed as `epss_rising` and in key facts.
- A weekly workflow calls every keyless data source the way the server does (`scripts/health_check.py`) and opens an issue when one fails or changes shape, so an upstream format change is caught before users hit it. It uses no API keys, only a separate job can write issues, and a manual "simulate failure" run tests the issue step.
### Security
- CVE descriptions from NVD and CISA KEV's text fields are cleaned of instruction-like text before the model sees them, like banners and advisories already were. Tests plant prompt-injection text in every outside source (NVD, KEV, OSV, endoflife.date, CVE records, InternetDB) and check it never reaches the model as an instruction.
### Fixed
- Plugin and extension CVEs (36 for Jenkins 2.440) no longer count as the product's own "needs review" CVEs; they're listed separately as `plugin_cves_not_counted`.
- A product with more NVD candidates than were read (Windows 10 22H2 has about 3,456) says how many were checked and that its counts are a minimum. With an NVD key, up to 4,000 are read instead of 1,000.
- "Citrix ADC", NetScaler's former name, maps to NetScaler.
- `am_i_affected` items say which Windows release a build number was mapped to, and Windows 10 and 11 releases get end-of-life dates from endoflife.date (Home and Pro dates, with a note that other editions and paid extended updates last longer).
- When a Linux or Unix build rules out Windows-oSource: the official MCP Registry list on 2026-10-31 and on 2026-11-01; release notes from the GitHub Releases API, checked 2026-11-01.
What it is
How do I add it to my client?
Config from the registry entry
From the PyPI package vulnerability-exposure-mcp
Add to CursorAn install link in the format Cursor documents, holding the Cursor config below. The command runs the publisher’s code on your machine.
Claude Desktop · claude_desktop_config.json (Settings → Developer → Edit Config)
{
"mcpServers": {
"vulnerability-exposure-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"vulnerability-exposure-mcp==1.2.0"
]
}
}
}Cursor · .cursor/mcp.json in a project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"vulnerability-exposure-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"vulnerability-exposure-mcp==1.2.0"
]
}
}
}VS Code · .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"vulnerability-exposure-mcp": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"vulnerability-exposure-mcp==1.2.0"
]
}
}
}VS Code (command line) · Bash or zsh terminal (macOS, Linux)
code --add-mcp '{"name":"vulnerability-exposure-mcp","type":"stdio","command":"uvx","args":["vulnerability-exposure-mcp==1.2.0"]}'Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio vulnerability-exposure-mcp -- uvx vulnerability-exposure-mcp==1.2.0
Cline · cline_mcp_settings.json (Cline CLI: ~/.cline/data/settings/; in the editor: MCP Servers → Configure → Configure MCP Servers)
{
"mcpServers": {
"vulnerability-exposure-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"vulnerability-exposure-mcp==1.2.0"
],
"disabled": false,
"autoApprove": []
}
}
}Gemini CLI · ~/.gemini/settings.json, or .gemini/settings.json in a project
{
"mcpServers": {
"vulnerability-exposure-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"vulnerability-exposure-mcp==1.2.0"
]
}
}
}OpenAI Codex · ~/.codex/config.toml, or .codex/config.toml in a trusted project
[mcp_servers.vulnerability-exposure-mcp] command = "uvx" args = ["vulnerability-exposure-mcp==1.2.0"]
Zed · Zed settings file (command: zed: open settings file)
{
"context_servers": {
"vulnerability-exposure-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"vulnerability-exposure-mcp==1.2.0"
]
}
}
}Try it in the MCP Inspector · runs on your machine, opens in your browser · Node 22.19+
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector@2.11.0 -- uvx vulnerability-exposure-mcp==1.2.0
- Optional settings the entry also lists (left out above): SHODAN_API_KEY, VIRUSTOTAL_API_KEY, ABUSEIPDB_API_KEY, NVD_API_KEY, GREYNOISE_API_KEY.
- This runs the publisher's code on your machine (uvx). Read its README first.
- The MCP Inspector lists the server's tools, resources and prompts; a tool you call there runs for real.
Built from the server's registry entry with each client's documented format (checked 2026-10-14; the Cursor link and the VS Code command 2026-10-19; the MCP Inspector command 2026-10-21; Cline, Gemini CLI, OpenAI Codex and Zed 2026-10-26). Values in < > are yours to fill in; this page never contains a key. Where the server needs a setting the entry does not declare, it can still fail to start.
Can it be installed, and is it up to date?
Version pin · advisories
Listed version
- Registry lists
- 1.2.0
- Latest stable
- 1.2.0
- Status
- current
- Withdrawn
- no
Source: pypi.org · 2026-11-01. About the version the registry lists; a manual install may resolve to a different one.
Integrity, provenance, license
- Integrity
- sha256-e752f9224fd9b0f83…
- License
- MIT
Source: the package registry · 2026-11-01.
Usage
- Downloads
- 0 in the last month
Source: pypistats.org · 2026-11-01.
Does the registry listing match what we found?
Feature #6The registry checks an entry when it is published (each new version), and nothing re-checks it on a schedule. A difference below is about the listing, not a judgement of the publisher.
| Registry says | We found | Result | Source · date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version 1.2.0 on PyPI | Exists and can be installed | matches | PyPI · 2026-11-01 |
| Repository github.com/MRFrazer25/Vulnerability-Exposure-MCP | Opens publicly | matches | api.github.com · 2026-11-01 |
Who made it?
Feature #7 · lineage
Facts about the publisher. We do not turn them into a trust score.
- Namespace
- io.github.MRFrazer25
- GitHub owner
- a personal account (MRFrazer25)
- Repository
- github.com/MRFrazer25/Vulnerability-Exposure-MCP
- Stars
- 1
- Repository age
- 0–30 days
- Last push
- 0–30 days ago
- Archived
- no
- Security policy
- SECURITY.md
Source: the registry entry and api.github.com · 2026-11-01; security policy read from GitHub · 2026-11-01.
Publish this server? Run these checks against it yourself before release, from your own machine: a server the command starts, or your own server at its URL after a one-time proof that you control it: npx protocolprobe-selftest.
Choosing
Record checks
Public records · not a safety rating7 of 7 record checks met · 1 does not apply · 1 not checked
- #17,470 of 18,055 packages by monthly downloads, tied with 585 others
- Not ranked by stars: 1 star (ranked from 10)
- MetRegistry entry is active and says how to run itActive, with a package or a remote address.
- MetSource repository link opensThe linked GitHub repository is public.
- MetRepository is not archivedNot archived.
- MetCode pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our checkLast push 0-30 days before our check.
- MetRepository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)SECURITY.md found.
- MetPackage names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifierMIT
- MetThe version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawnThe listed version exists and is current.
- Does not applynpm package carries build provenance (attestation)PyPI packages have no npm-style attestation.
- Not checkedNo known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependenciesWe could not resolve its dependencies.
Read from public records only: the registry entry, npm/PyPI, GitHub and advisory databases, checked 2026-11-01 (security policy 2026-11-01). No tool was called. Only “met” and “not met” are counted, so the total differs between servers; a check that does not apply or that we could not run is listed, never counted against it. It is not a safety rating, and the same rules apply to every server. How each check works · Leaderboards · How we stay neutral
Common questions about io.github.MRFrazer25/vulnerability-exposure-mcp
Answered from the data aboveWho publishes io.github.MRFrazer25/vulnerability-exposure-mcp?
The registry ties the namespace io.github.MRFrazer25 to the GitHub account MRFrazer25; only its owner can publish under it. Its linked repository, github.com/MRFrazer25/Vulnerability-Exposure-MCP, belongs to the same GitHub account. These are facts from the registry and GitHub, not a rating.
Is io.github.MRFrazer25/vulnerability-exposure-mcp safe to install?
We do not rate servers as safe or unsafe. 7 of its 7 applicable record checks are met (facts from public records, each listed on this page). What the records show: Its source repository opens publicly. Its repository had a push in the last 90 days. The listed version is the latest stable release. The package itself has no known vulnerability (OSV.dev). These are facts with their sources on this page, not a safety guarantee, and we did not run its tools.
Has io.github.MRFrazer25/vulnerability-exposure-mcp been security tested?
No. It could be started, but has not been tested; we call no server's tools for anything we publish. This is our limit, not the server's.
Does io.github.MRFrazer25/vulnerability-exposure-mcp publish a security policy?
Yes: its repository has a public security policy (github.com/mrfrazer25/vulnerability-exposure-mcp/blob/HEAD/SECURITY.md). That is the publisher's statement, not permission for us to test the server, and we call none of its tools.
Is the listed version current?
Yes. The registry lists 1.2.0, the latest stable release on PyPI.
Where is the source code of io.github.MRFrazer25/vulnerability-exposure-mcp?
In github.com/MRFrazer25/Vulnerability-Exposure-MCP, which opens publicly.
Found this page useful?
Anonymous · no sign-inA quick, anonymous reaction — no account, no email. One per kind from your browser. The tally updates when the page is next refreshed, and it is only a rough count, never a safety rating or a measured number of people.
Compare with another server
Side by side: registry entry, our read-only session, the tools and the 18 classification fields. Same values as each page; no score.
Security testing
Has it been tested?
Feature #1It could be started, but has not been tested; we call no server's tools for anything we publish. This is our limit, not the server's. — our limit
Reference
How is it classified?
18 fields
One value per field, each with its source. Fields written by AI models are marked. A field with no value says why.
“Not stated” means the source did not state it; “does not apply” means it does not apply to this kind of server; “our limit” means our own lookup failed. A linked value opens the directory filtered to the same value.
Cite or correct this page
Sources and corrections
Suggested citation
ProtocolProbe. “io.github.MRFrazer25/vulnerability-exposure-mcp: MCP server record.” Data checked 2026-11-01. https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/io.github.MRFrazer25/vulnerability-exposure-mcp
Figures are valid for the date shown. Our facts on this page are CC BY 4.0: reuse them with a link and the check date. Quoted text (the publisher’s descriptions, website quotes, tool names) is not ours to license.
As JSON: this record in the API · API documentation.
Badge for your README
[](https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/io.github.MRFrazer25/vulnerability-exposure-mcp)
It shows this server's record-check count: facts from public records, no tool called. It is not a security rating or a pass. It links here and updates after each data reload.
Something wrong, or is this yours?
If a fact here is wrong, tell us and we will re-check it. If you operate this server, you can run our checks on it yourself with the free self-test command; we call no server’s tools ourselves for anything shown here.
Write to hello@protocolprobe.com · corrections log · methodology