Skip to content

MCP servers › io.github.exeris-systems › ai-bridge

MCP server · registry snapshot 2026-10-23 · last tested 2026-10-23

io.github.exeris-systems/ai-bridge

Read-only Exeris context for AI agents: ADRs, SDK contract, build output, kernel diagnostics. — the publisher's description

9 of 9 record checks metRead-only · tools listed 2026-10-23Topic: developer-tools · AI-classifiedversion 0.8.0TypeScriptApache-2.0standard input/output31 tools

Summary

io.github.exeris-systems/ai-bridge is a local MCP server listed in the official MCP registry at version 0.8.0. On 2026-10-23 ProtocolProbe started its published package in an isolated sandbox in read-only mode and read its inventory: 31 tools, 0 resources and 0 prompts.

Record checks

9 of 9 record checks met

  • met: Registry entry is active and says how to run it
  • met: Source repository link opens
  • met: Repository is not archived
  • met: Code pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our check
  • met: Repository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)
  • met: Package names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifier
  • met: The version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawn
  • met: npm package carries build provenance (attestation)
  • met: No known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependencies
  • Not ranked by downloads: no download figure available
  • Not ranked by stars: 0 stars (ranked from 10)

From public records, not a safety rating. Each check with its reason · Is it safe to install?

Key facts

Runs
local package
Transport
standard input/output
Package
npm · listed version current
License
Apache-2.0
Dependencies
no known high or critical advisories
Repository
public
Tools
31
Described as changing data
1 of 31 toolsAI-classified
Topic
developer-toolsAI-classified
Last tested
2026-10-23

Add to your client

Worth knowing before you connect it

  • 1 tool is described as changing something (lsp-preview_mutation): our AI model's reading of the descriptions, not something we tested. We did not call it.
  • Its package is signed and carries a build record naming its source.

Each line comes from a section below, with its source and date.

How fresh this is

Live-tested
yes, a real session (not a text-only review)
Last tested
2026-10-23
Mode
read-only (no tool calls)
Latest version
0.8.0, published 2026-10-21 (registry, as of the 2026-10-23 snapshot)
First listed version
2026-10-21 (earliest version still in the registry; older removed versions would be earlier)
Registry data
snapshot 2026-10-23
Package and repository
checked 2026-10-23
Engine
mcp-runtime-engine@0.1.0 · sdk@1.32.0

Changes since the last refresh

New in the registry: not in the list of 2026-10-04, listed on 2026-10-23 with version 0.8.0 (published 2026-10-21).

Source: the official MCP Registry list on 2026-10-04 and on 2026-10-23.

What it is

What does this server offer?

Observed inventory
31tools
0resources
0prompts

1 of 31 tools are described as changing something (creating, editing, deleting, sending or running).

  • docs-list_adrsreads or searches

    “List all ADRs from the Exeris ecosystem registry.”

    1 input
    • statusstring“Filter to entries whose status.state equals this value (case-insensitive; trimmed before comparison).”
  • docs-get_adrreads or searches

    “Fetch the full markdown body of a specific ADR by number.”

    1 input, 1 required
    • numberintegerrequired“ADR number (e.g.”
  • docs-get_templatereads or searches

    “Fetch one of the canonical decision-doc templates from exeris-docs/templates/.”

    1 input, 1 required
    • kindstringrequired“Template kind: ADR, RFC, or RESEARCH.”
  • docs-get_hlareads or searches

    “Fetch the High-Level Architecture document (high-level-architecture.md) from exeris-docs.”

    Takes no inputs.

  • docs-get_whitepaperreads or searches

    “Fetch the B2B technical whitepaper (b2b-technical-whitepaper.md) from exeris-docs.”

    Takes no inputs.

  • docs-searchreads or searches

    “Search exeris-docs for a literal substring (case-insensitive).”

    3 inputs, 1 required
    • querystringrequired“Literal substring to search for (case-insensitive).”
    • pathFilterstring“Optional substring; only files whose relative path contains this string are scanned.”
    • maxResultsinteger“Maximum hits to return (default 50, hard cap 200).”
  • docs-list_reposreads or searches

    “List sibling Exeris repos under the ecosystem root that publish a `docs/` directory.”

    Takes no inputs.

  • docs-list_repo_docsreads or searches

    “List markdown documents under `<repo>/docs/**` for an Exeris sibling repo.”

    1 input, 1 required
    • repostringrequired“Repo name (e.g.”
  • docs-get_repo_docreads or searches

    “Fetch a specific markdown document from `<repo>/docs/<path>`.”

    2 inputs, 2 required
    • repostringrequired“Repo name (e.g.”
    • pathstringrequired“Path relative to `<repo>/docs/`, e.g.”
  • lsp-list_domainsreads or searches

    “List all @ExerisDomain types known to the active LSP session.”

    Takes no inputs.

  • lsp-describe_domainreads or searches

    “Return the source-model description of an @ExerisDomain type: fields, actions, relationships, generated artefacts, and the `sourceDigest` that `lsp-preview_mutation` takes as its concurrency token.”

    1 input, 1 required
    • qualifiedNamestringrequired“Fully-qualified Java class name.”
  • lsp-list_actionsreads or searches

    “List all @Action methods across the workspace, with their owning @ExerisDomain.”

    Takes no inputs.

Show 19 more tools
  • lsp-preview_mutationcreates or changes datadescribed as changing data

    “Preview how the SDK's canonical writer would change an @ExerisDomain source file for one mutation, applied in memory.”

    4 inputs, 2 required
    • qualifiedNamestringrequired“Fully-qualified Java class name of the target domain.”
    • opobjectrequired“One SDK MutationOp, discriminated by `op`: addField, removeField, renameField, changeFieldType, addRelationship, removeRelationship, changeRelationshipCardinal…”
    • baselineJsonstring“The entity's last-emitted `target/classes/exeris-metadata/<entity>.json` (see `build-get_domain_metadata`), as a string.”
    • concurrencyTokenstring“The `sourceDigest` returned by `lsp-describe_domain` for this domain.”
  • kernel-list_providersreads or searches

    “List all SPI providers registered with the running kernel, including driver origin (community/enterprise priority).”

    Takes no inputs.

  • kernel-get_bootstrap_dagreads or searches

    “Snapshot of the kernel bootstrap dependency DAG — nodes (subsystems) with their phase, declared dependencies, and running state.”

    Takes no inputs.

  • kernel-describe_subsystemreads or searches

    “Detail for a single kernel subsystem by name (e.g.”

    1 input, 1 required
    • namestringrequired“Subsystem name to describe.”
  • kernel-get_jvm_ergonomicsreads or searches

    “What the JVM running the kernel actually resolved at startup: selected GC, max/committed heap, visible processors, and the container limits it detected (cgroup CPU quota/period, memory cap, cpuset) p…”

    Takes no inputs.

  • build-list_domainsreads or searches

    “List what this project's last build emitted into target/classes/exeris-metadata: every @ExerisDomain entity, plus the enums, capabilities and views the processor wrote alongside them, each with its k…”

    Takes no inputs.

  • build-get_domain_metadatareads or searches

    “Fetch the DomainMetadata JSON the annotation processor emitted for one declaration of this project — the authoritative AST the code generators consume, including fields, actions, events, relationship…”

    2 inputs, 1 required
    • namestringrequired“Java simple name of the entity, enum, capability or view.”
    • kindstring“Which kind of declaration to read.”
  • build-explain_artefactsreads or searches

    “List the files Exeris codegen has generated into this project, each with the generator that produced it and when that generator emits — handlers, services, repositories, domain errors, event publishe…”

    1 input
    • entitystring“Optional Java simple name (e.g.”
  • build-get_detach_statereads or searches

    “Report whether this project's generated code is still pipeline-owned (L1, src/main/generated/java — regenerated on every build, so edits are lost) or has been detached into the developer's own source…”

    Takes no inputs.

  • build-explain_diagnosticcalculates or converts

    “Decode an error, warning or note exeris-tooling printed — an annotation-processor message, a codegen plugin goal failure or warning, a capability-graph or cap-tier Wall refusal, a missing runtime dri…”

    1 input, 1 required
    • textstringrequired“The diagnostic, pasted verbatim.”
  • caps-list_capabilitiesreads or searches

    “List the capability modules composed into this project, from the build-time cap-manifest.json: each module's qualified name, the services it provides with their versions, and which module owns the li…”

    Takes no inputs.

  • caps-describe_compositionreads or searches

    “Report the composition stamp from cap-manifest.json: whether the capability graph validated, the composition version, and the content binding digest, alongside the manifest schema version, the module…”

    Takes no inputs.

  • sdk-list_annotationsreads or searches

    “List Exeris SDK annotations from the authoring contract: name, qualified name, package, targets, retention, and purpose.”

    3 inputs
    • packagestring“Optional package filter, e.g.”
    • targetstring“Optional ElementType target filter, e.g.”
    • querystring“Optional case-insensitive search string matching annotation name or purpose.”
  • sdk-describe_annotationreads or searches

    “Describe a specific Exeris SDK annotation: simple and qualified name, owning package rationale, targets, retention, purpose, detailed description, all attributes (with types, defaults, required-ness,…”

    1 input, 1 required
    • annotationstringrequired“The annotation name to inspect.”
  • sdk-get_scoping_rulesreads or searches

    “Get canonical authoring contract scoping rules for Exeris SDK annotations (including @Field vs @Validation split, FieldMetadata as single AST carrier per ADR-054, derived SQL NOT NULL and API not-bla…”

    1 input
    • rulestring“Optional rule identifier (e.g.”
  • sdk-list_deprecationsreads or searches

    “List all deprecated Exeris SDK annotations and attributes across the authoring contract, including replacement guidance, since version, and forRemoval status.”

    2 inputs
    • forRemovalOnlyboolean“If true, only returns items marked for removal (forRemoval: true).”
    • packagestring“Optional package filter (e.g.”
  • sdk-get_ast_schemareads or searches

    “Get JSON Schema for the Exeris build-time DomainMetadata AST and sibling records.”

    1 input
    • definitionstring“Optional AST definition name (e.g.”
  • bridge-versionreads or searches

    “Identify this MCP server: package name and version, the Node runtime it is running on, which persona mode it resolved to, and what bundled reference data it carries.”

    Takes no inputs.

  • bridge-healthreads or searches

    “Report which tool families can serve requests and why the others cannot.”

    Takes no inputs.

Each quoted sentence is the first sentence of the publisher’s own description. The kind of tool and the “changes data” mark are our AI model’s reading of that description, not something we tested: two differently worded runs had to agree, otherwise no label is shown, and nobody has checked them by hand. A tool without the “changes data” mark is described as only reading, searching or calculating, or the two runs did not agree. No tool was called. Read the publisher’s full description before relying on it. Inputs are the parameters in the tool's own input schema: name, declared type, whether it is required, and the first sentence of its description. Read 2026-10-23.

How well are its tools described?

Features #4 and #5

How clearly this server's own tool descriptions say what a tool does, and how consistent its tool list is. The first part is an AI model's yes/no reading of each description; the second part is counted. We do not turn it into a grade.

Descriptions

AI reading of each description

Says what the tool does
100% of 31 tools
Says what it returns
100% of 31 tools
States limits, defaults or errors
3% of 30 tools
Says when to use it
0% of 27 tools
Items covered per tool
2.2 of 4 on average

Counted from the listing

Parameters with a description
100% of 27
Tools with a description
100% of 31
Typical description length
295 characters

The tool set

Counted from the listing

Tools
31
Size of the list
about 4,055 tokens for an agent to load (characters ÷ 4)
Naming
28 of 31 names use mixed or other styles

AI reading: easy to mix up

No pair found.

The AI items cover 31 of 31 tools: for a tool where two differently worded runs disagreed, that item is left out. They were not checked by hand, and no tool was called. “Easy to mix up” means two tools whose names or descriptions overlap without saying how they differ; the AI found none. We do not rate whether the tool set is complete or whether side effects are spelled out, because our AI reading of those was not reliable enough.

How do I add it to my client?

Config from the registry entry

From the npm package @exeris/ai-bridge

Our sandbox started this package on 2026-10-23 (a read-only session: no tool was called).

Add to CursorAn install link in the format Cursor documents, holding the Cursor config below. The command runs the publisher’s code on your machine.

Claude Desktop · claude_desktop_config.json (Settings → Developer → Edit Config)
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ai-bridge": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@exeris/ai-bridge@0.8.0"
      ]
    }
  }
}
Cursor · .cursor/mcp.json in a project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ai-bridge": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@exeris/ai-bridge@0.8.0"
      ]
    }
  }
}
VS Code · .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "ai-bridge": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@exeris/ai-bridge@0.8.0"
      ]
    }
  }
}
VS Code (command line) · Bash or zsh terminal (macOS, Linux)
code --add-mcp '{"name":"ai-bridge","type":"stdio","command":"npx","args":["-y","@exeris/ai-bridge@0.8.0"]}'
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio ai-bridge -- npx -y @exeris/ai-bridge@0.8.0
Try it in the MCP Inspector · runs on your machine, opens in your browser · Node 22.19+
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector@2.11.0 -- npx -y @exeris/ai-bridge@0.8.0
  • Optional settings the entry also lists (left out above): EXERIS_PROJECT_ROOT, EXERIS_DOCS_ROOT.
  • This runs the publisher's code on your machine (npx). Read its README first.
  • The MCP Inspector lists the server's tools, resources and prompts; a tool you call there runs for real.

Built from the server's registry entry with each client's documented format (checked 2026-10-14; the Cursor link and the VS Code command 2026-10-19; the MCP Inspector command 2026-10-21). Values in < > are yours to fill in; this page never contains a key. Where the server needs a setting the entry does not declare, it can still fail to start.

Can it be installed, and is it up to date?

Version pin · advisories

Listed version

Registry lists
0.8.0
Latest stable
0.8.0
Status
current
Withdrawn
no

Source: registry.npmjs.org · 2026-10-23. About the version the registry lists; a manual install may resolve to a different one.

Dependency advisories

critical0high0moderate0low0

Counted in the full dependency tree as resolved on 2026-10-23 (npm audit). Bars share one scale. The package itself has no known vulnerability (OSV.dev).

Integrity, provenance, license

Integrity
sha512-yVWg+pPGa1qWOBsaQ…
Signature
signed and attested
License
Apache-2.0

Source: the package registry · 2026-10-23.

Does the registry listing match what we found?

Feature #6

The registry verifies a package once, when it is published, and does not re-check it. A difference below is about the listing, not a judgement of the publisher.

Registry saysWe foundResultSource · date
Published package can be startedStarted and answeredmatchesour test · 2026-10-23
Version 0.8.0 on npmExists and can be installedmatchesnpm · 2026-10-23
Repository github.com/exeris-systems/exeris-ai-bridgeOpens publiclymatchesapi.github.com · 2026-10-23

Who made it?

Feature #7 · lineage

Facts about the publisher. We do not turn them into a trust score.

Namespace
io.github.exeris-systems
GitHub owner
an organization (exeris-systems)
Build record
signed and attested
Repository
github.com/exeris-systems/exeris-ai-bridge
Stars
0
Repository age
91–180 days
Last push
0–30 days ago
Archived
no
Security policy
owner's .github/SECURITY.md

What its security policy says about security research

“Good-faith research that avoids data destruction, persistence, lateral movement, access to third-party secrets and public disclosure before coordination is welcome, and we will not pursue it. This statement is not legal advice and does not authorise testing against third-party systems, production tenants or infrastructure you do not own.”

The publisher’s own words from its security policy (formatting removed; a long passage is cut and marked “…”). Read the full policy for its conditions. This is the publisher’s statement, not our assessment. We still do not call this server’s tools: our checks only read what it lists.

Source: the registry entry and api.github.com · 2026-10-23; security policy read from GitHub · 2026-10-23.

Publish this server? Run these checks against it yourself before release, from your own machine: a server the command starts, or your own server at its URL after a one-time proof that you control it: npx protocolprobe-selftest.

Choosing

Record checks

Public records · not a safety rating

9 of 9 record checks met

  • Not ranked by downloads: no download figure available
  • Not ranked by stars: 0 stars (ranked from 10)
  • MetRegistry entry is active and says how to run itActive, with a package or a remote address.
  • MetSource repository link opensThe linked GitHub repository is public.
  • MetRepository is not archivedNot archived.
  • MetCode pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our checkLast push 0-30 days before our check.
  • MetRepository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)SECURITY.md found.
  • MetPackage names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifierApache-2.0
  • MetThe version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawnThe listed version exists and is current.
  • Metnpm package carries build provenance (attestation)Signed, with a build attestation naming the source and workflow.
  • MetNo known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependenciesNone known in the package or its dependency tree.

Read from public records only: the registry entry, npm/PyPI, GitHub and advisory databases, checked 2026-10-23. No tool was called. Only “met” and “not met” are counted, so the total differs between servers; a check that does not apply or that we could not run is listed, never counted against it. It is not a safety rating. How each check works · Leaderboards

Common questions about io.github.exeris-systems/ai-bridge

Answered from the data above

Is io.github.exeris-systems/ai-bridge safe to install?

We do not rate servers as safe or unsafe. 9 of its 9 applicable record checks are met (facts from public records, each listed on this page). What the records show: Its npm package carries a build-provenance attestation that names its source repository and build workflow. Its source repository opens publicly. Its repository had a push in the last 90 days. The listed version is the latest stable release. The package itself has no known vulnerability (OSV.dev). Its full dependency tree has no known advisory. 1 of its tools describes changing data (our AI model's reading of the descriptions). These are facts with their sources on this page, not a safety guarantee, and we did not run its tools.

Has io.github.exeris-systems/ai-bridge been security tested?

Partly. 2 of the 12 checks that apply to it were exercised. We started the package in an isolated sandbox and read what it declares, but this test round was read-only, so its tools were not called. No security verdict is published before verification.

What can io.github.exeris-systems/ai-bridge do?

It lists 31 tools. In our AI model's reading of their descriptions (two runs had to agree, nobody checked it by hand), they include tools that read or search, create or change data and calculate or convert. We did not call any tool, so this describes the text, not the behaviour.

Can io.github.exeris-systems/ai-bridge change or delete data?

1 of its tools says in its description that it creates, edits, deletes, sends or runs something (our AI model's reading). We did not call any tool, so we cannot say what actually happens.

Does io.github.exeris-systems/ai-bridge publish a security policy?

Yes: its repository has a public security policy (github.com/exeris-systems/.github/blob/HEAD/SECURITY.md). It includes a statement about security research, quoted in the publisher's own words on this page. That is the publisher's statement, not permission for us to test the server, and we call none of its tools.

Is the listed version current?

Yes. The registry lists 0.8.0, the latest stable release on npm.

Where is the source code of io.github.exeris-systems/ai-bridge?

In github.com/exeris-systems/exeris-ai-bridge, which opens publicly.

Found this page useful?

Anonymous · no sign-in

A quick, anonymous reaction — no account, no email. One per kind from your browser. The tally updates when the page is next refreshed, and it is only a rough count, never a safety rating or a measured number of people.

Similar servers

Same topic · AI-read

Active servers whose topic is also “developer-tools” and that have at least one tool of the same kind; most kinds in common first, then most GitHub stars. The topic and the tool kinds are an AI model's reading of the publishers' descriptions, not checked by hand. Similar is not a recommendation.

Compare with another server

Side by side: registry entry, our read-only session, the tools and the 18 classification fields. Same values as each page; no score.

Security testing

What did we test, and what did we leave out?

18 checks · features #1, #2

Not probed (read-only run)

We started the package in an isolated sandbox and read what it declares, but this test round was read-only, so its tools were not called. No security score is given; a check we did not run is never counted as passed.

The 18 checks at a glanceour test · 2026-10-23
  1. Inventory: exercised
  2. Hidden instructions: exercised
  3. Real execution: not run · our policy
  4. Secret leak: not run · nothing to check it against
  5. Internal addresses: not run · our policy
  6. Unconfirmed changes: not run · our policy
  7. Bad input: not run · our policy
  8. Model requests: not run · nothing to check it against
  9. Sensitive questions: not run · nothing to check it against
  10. Folder boundary: not run · our policy
  11. Log leaks: not run · nothing to check it against
  12. Hidden content: not run · nothing to check it against
  13. Fake assistant turns: not applicable
  14. Token passthrough: not applicable
  15. Token audience: not applicable
  16. Sign-in redirect: not applicable
  17. Consent handling: not applicable
  18. Sign-in metadata: not applicable

2 exercised10 not run (reason given)6 not applicable

Each check ends in exactly one state: exercised, not run (with the reason), or not applicable (with the reason). 2 of the 12 checks that apply to it were exercised. We do not publish security-check outcomes for named servers.

Exercised · 2
  • 1Inventory
    tool-list
    Reads the declared tools, resources and prompts.exercised
  • 2Hidden instructions
    description-poisoning
    Looks for hidden instructions in tool descriptions.exercised
Not run, with the reason · 10
  • 3Real execution
    real-execution
    Calls a tool and checks what really happens.This check calls the package's tools. This test round was read-only, so no tool was called; tools can act on outside services with the publisher's or a user's account.not run · our policy
  • 4Secret leak
    canary-leak
    Plants a fake secret and checks whether it leaks.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against
  • 5Internal addresses
    ssrf
    Checks whether a tool can be steered to internal addresses.This check calls the package's tools. This test round was read-only, so no tool was called; tools can act on outside services with the publisher's or a user's account.not run · our policy
  • 6Unconfirmed changes
    write-without-confirmation
    Checks whether tools that change data act without asking.This check calls the package's tools. This test round was read-only, so no tool was called; tools can act on outside services with the publisher's or a user's account.not run · our policy
  • 7Bad input
    error-handling
    Sends bad input and watches how the server answers.This check calls the package's tools. This test round was read-only, so no tool was called; tools can act on outside services with the publisher's or a user's account.not run · our policy
  • 8Model requests
    sampling
    Checks whether the server asks the client's model to act for it.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against
  • 9Sensitive questions
    elicitation-sensitive-data
    Checks whether the server asks users for sensitive data.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against
  • 10Folder boundary
    root-boundary
    Checks whether the server reaches outside the folders it was given.This check calls the package's tools. This test round was read-only, so no tool was called; tools can act on outside services with the publisher's or a user's account.not run · our policy
  • 11Log leaks
    logging-side-channel
    Checks whether log messages carry data they should not.This check needs at least one successful tool call to have something to check, and no tool was called.not run · nothing to check it against
  • 12Hidden content
    audience-hiding
    Checks resources that hide content from the user.This check needs content the server returns, and nothing was read or called.not run · nothing to check it against
Does not apply to this server · 6
  • 13Fake assistant turns
    fake-assistant-turn
    Checks prompts that pose as the assistant's own words.The server exposes no prompts.not applicable
  • 14Token passthrough
    token-passthrough
    Checks whether the server forwards a user's token to other services.The server runs locally over standard input/output, so there is no sign-in flow to check.not applicable
  • 15Token audience
    token-audience-validation
    Checks whether tokens meant for another service are accepted.The server runs locally over standard input/output, so there is no sign-in flow to check.not applicable
  • 16Sign-in redirect
    open-redirect
    Checks the sign-in redirect for abuse.The server runs locally over standard input/output, so there is no sign-in flow to check.not applicable
  • 17Consent handling
    confused-deputy
    Checks consent handling when one service acts for another.The server runs locally over standard input/output, so there is no sign-in flow to check.not applicable
  • 18Sign-in metadata
    oauth-url-scheme
    Checks the published sign-in metadata for unsafe URLs.The server runs locally over standard input/output, so there is no sign-in flow to check.not applicable

Source: our own test in an isolated sandbox, 2026-10-23, mcp-runtime-engine@0.1.0. Which checks count and why follows our published scoring model.

What happened during the test?

Feature #8

The steps in order, as the test record holds them.

  1. 0 msStarted the published package in an isolated sandbox (read-only mode)
  2. 3,177 msConnected after 0 redirects.
  3. Read the inventory: 31 tools, 0 resources, 0 prompts.
  4. 13,917 msFinished: 2 checks exercised.

Reference

How is it classified?

18 fields

One value per field, each with its source. Fields written by AI models are marked. A field with no value says why.

TopicAI-classified
AI-classified · 2026-10-23
Pricing modelAI-classified
not checked
no website in the registry entry
Programming language
api.github.com · 2026-10-23
Hosting type
registry · 2026-10-23
MCP capability
tools
our test · 2026-10-23
Transport
standard input/output
registry · 2026-10-23
Required credentials
none declared
registry · no declaration is not a guarantee
Package registry
registry · 2026-10-23
Freshness
0–30 days
registry updatedAt · 2026-10-23
Lifecycle status
registry · 2026-10-23
License class
package registry · 2026-10-23
Integrity hash
declared (sri)
package registry · 2026-10-23
Signature / provenance
package registry · 2026-10-23
Dependency advisories
none known
npm audit · 2026-10-23
Popularity
not known (our limit)
Our lookup failed (network error, timeout or rate limit). This is our limit, not the server's.
Publisher signals
owner: an organization · repository age: 91–180 days · stars: 0–9 · build record: signed and attested
api.github.com · 2026-10-23
Maintenance
api.github.com · 2026-10-23
Environment
your machine
where it runs, from the hosting type

“Not stated” means the source did not state it; “does not apply” means it does not apply to this kind of server; “our limit” means our own lookup failed. A linked value opens the directory filtered to the same value.

Cite or correct this page

Sources and corrections

Suggested citation

ProtocolProbe. “io.github.exeris-systems/ai-bridge: MCP server record.” Data checked 2026-10-23. https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/io.github.exeris-systems/ai-bridge

Figures are valid for the date shown. Our facts on this page are CC BY 4.0: reuse them with a link and the check date. Quoted text (the publisher’s descriptions, website quotes, tool names) is not ours to license.

As JSON: this record in the API · API documentation.

Badge for your README

ProtocolProbe: 9 of 9 record checks met

[![ProtocolProbe](https://protocolprobe.com/api/v1/badge/io.github.exeris-systems/ai-bridge)](https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/io.github.exeris-systems/ai-bridge)

It shows this server's record-check count: facts from public records, no tool called. It is not a security rating or a pass. It links here and updates after each data reload.

Something wrong, or is this yours?

If a fact here is wrong, tell us and we will re-check it. If you operate this server, you can run our checks on it yourself with the free self-test command; we call no server’s tools ourselves for anything shown here.

Write to hello@protocolprobe.com · corrections log · methodology