Skip to content

MCP servers › io.github.pironjulien › nexus-agymail

MCP server · registry snapshot 2026-11-01 · last checked 2026-11-01

io.github.pironjulien/nexus-agymail

by pironjulien · GitHub account (the registry's namespace rule)repository: same ownerSource ↗Website ↗

Gmail for Google Antigravity via the official API; sends only after the user's yes. — the publisher's description

5 of 5 record checks metversion 0.16.0C#standard input/output

Summary

io.github.pironjulien/nexus-agymail is a local MCP server listed in the official MCP registry at version 0.16.0, under the namespace of the GitHub account pironjulien. Its linked repository, github.com/pironjulien/NexusAGYmail, belongs to the same GitHub account.

Record checks

5 of 5 record checks met · 4 do not apply

  • met: Registry entry is active and says how to run it
  • met: Source repository link opens
  • met: Repository is not archived
  • met: Code pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our check
  • met: Repository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)
  • not applicable: Package names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifier
  • not applicable: The version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawn
  • not applicable: npm package carries build provenance (attestation)
  • not applicable: No known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependencies
  • Not ranked by downloads: not an npm or PyPI package
  • Not ranked by stars: 1 star (ranked from 10)

From public records, not a safety rating. Each check with its reason · Is it safe to install?

Operate this server? Correct a fact · README badge · Run the checks yourself

Key facts

Runs
local package
Transport
standard input/output
Your own values
none declared (not a guarantee)
Package
MCP bundle
Repository
public
Last tested
not tested

Tool list

Not read: It could be started, but has not been tested; we call no server's tools for anything we publish. This is our limit, not the server's. So there is no tool-list size and no result from the three APIs.

Add to your client

How fresh this is

Live-tested
no
Last tested
not tested
Latest version
0.16.0, published 2026-10-31 (registry, as of the 2026-11-01 snapshot)
First listed version
2026-10-25 (earliest version still in the registry; older removed versions would be earlier)
Version history
27 versions listed, 2026-10-25 to 2026-10-31; 27 in the 90 days before the 2026-11-01 snapshot.
Most recent 12 versions
  • 0.16.0 · 2026-10-31
  • 0.15.4 · 2026-10-31
  • 0.15.3 · 2026-10-31
  • 0.15.2 · 2026-10-30
  • 0.15.0 · 2026-10-30
  • 0.14.2 · 2026-10-30
  • 0.14.1 · 2026-10-30
  • 0.14.0 · 2026-10-30
  • 0.13.0 · 2026-10-30
  • 0.12.3 · 2026-10-28
  • 0.12.2 · 2026-10-27
  • 0.12.1 · 2026-10-27
(versions still listed in the registry only)
Registry data
snapshot 2026-11-01
Package and repository
checked 2026-11-01

Dead or stale signals

None found in the records we hold

Looked for and not found: deprecated in the registry; repository link does not open; repository archived; no push in over 365 days. Does not apply: listed version cannot be installed or is withdrawn. Each line is a dated fact from a public record. It does not say whether the server still works, and a record can change after the date shown.

Changes since the last refresh

Version 0.15.4 (published 2026-10-31) → 0.16.0 (published 2026-10-31), between the registry lists of 2026-10-31 and 2026-11-01.

The publisher’s GitHub release note for v0.16.0 (“NexusAGYmail 0.16.0”), published 2026-10-31.

Read the release note (the publisher’s text, shown as plain text)
### Added
- `get_message` and `get_thread` give each message's `authentication`: SPF, DKIM and DMARC as Gmail checked them on
  arrival, and a verdict (`pass`, `fail`, `none`, `unverified`); a DMARC failure adds `authentication_warning` (the
  From address may be forged). Only the topmost `Authentication-Results` written by `mx.google.com` counts: one the
  sender wrote lower down, or another server's, is ignored.
- `create_draft` takes `replyAll`: the reply also goes to the original To and Cc, never to this account or its
  aliases (Gmail's send-as list). Sending still needs the user's yes.
- Every failure says whether a new attempt is safe, with NexusBrowser's convention: `outcome` (`not_done`,
  `unknown`, `partial`) and `retry_safe` (quota and network failures yes; revoked or forbidden access no; a draft
  or send Gmail may have received never).

### Changed
- `label_message` / `unlabel_message` change up to 1,000 messages in one Gmail `users.messages.batchModify` call
  instead of one call per message. Threads and trash stay one call per item.
- A 403 whose reason is a rate limit is reported as `quota` (it was `forbidden`).
- Release: a push whose version is not released yet becomes the stable release right after its development build
  (same files); "Run workflow" still promotes by hand.

### Security
- CodeQL (GitHub default setup) and the OpenSSF Scorecard workflow run again on every push to main.

The release on GitHub

Source: the official MCP Registry list on 2026-10-31 and on 2026-11-01; release notes from the GitHub Releases API, checked 2026-11-01.

What it is

How do I add it to my client?

Config from the registry entry
  • No config: the MCP bundle is a file to install in a client that supports bundles, not a command.

Built from the server's registry entry with each client's documented format (checked 2026-10-14; the Cursor link and the VS Code command 2026-10-19; the MCP Inspector command 2026-10-21; Cline, Gemini CLI, OpenAI Codex and Zed 2026-10-26). Values in < > are yours to fill in; this page never contains a key. Where the server needs a setting the entry does not declare, it can still fail to start.

Does the registry listing match what we found?

Feature #6

The registry checks an entry when it is published (each new version), and nothing re-checks it on a schedule. A difference below is about the listing, not a judgement of the publisher.

Registry saysWe foundResultSource · date
Repository github.com/pironjulien/NexusAGYmailOpens publiclymatchesapi.github.com · 2026-11-01

Who made it?

Feature #7 · lineage

Facts about the publisher. We do not turn them into a trust score.

Namespace
io.github.pironjulien · 9 servers
GitHub owner
a personal account (pironjulien)
Repository
github.com/pironjulien/NexusAGYmail
Stars
1
Repository age
0–30 days
Last push
0–30 days ago
Archived
no
Security policy
SECURITY.md

Source: the registry entry and api.github.com · 2026-11-01; security policy read from GitHub · 2026-11-01.

Publish this server? Run these checks against it yourself before release, from your own machine: a server the command starts, or your own server at its URL after a one-time proof that you control it: npx protocolprobe-selftest.

Choosing

Record checks

Public records · not a safety rating

5 of 5 record checks met · 4 do not apply

  • Not ranked by downloads: not an npm or PyPI package
  • Not ranked by stars: 1 star (ranked from 10)
  • MetRegistry entry is active and says how to run itActive, with a package or a remote address.
  • MetSource repository link opensThe linked GitHub repository is public.
  • MetRepository is not archivedNot archived.
  • MetCode pushed to the repository in the 90 days before our checkLast push 0-30 days before our check.
  • MetRepository publishes a security policy (SECURITY.md)SECURITY.md found.
  • Does not applyPackage names its licence with a standard (SPDX) identifierNot an npm or PyPI package.
  • Does not applyThe version the registry lists can be installed and is not withdrawnNot an npm or PyPI package.
  • Does not applynpm package carries build provenance (attestation)PyPI packages have no npm-style attestation.
  • Does not applyNo known critical or high advisory in the package or its dependenciesNot an npm or PyPI package.

Read from public records only: the registry entry, npm/PyPI, GitHub and advisory databases, checked 2026-11-01 (security policy 2026-11-01). No tool was called. Only “met” and “not met” are counted, so the total differs between servers; a check that does not apply or that we could not run is listed, never counted against it. It is not a safety rating, and the same rules apply to every server. How each check works · Leaderboards · How we stay neutral

Common questions about io.github.pironjulien/nexus-agymail

Answered from the data above

Who publishes io.github.pironjulien/nexus-agymail?

The registry ties the namespace io.github.pironjulien to the GitHub account pironjulien; only its owner can publish under it. Its linked repository, github.com/pironjulien/NexusAGYmail, belongs to the same GitHub account. These are facts from the registry and GitHub, not a rating.

Is io.github.pironjulien/nexus-agymail safe to install?

We do not rate servers as safe or unsafe. 5 of its 5 applicable record checks are met (facts from public records, each listed on this page). What the records show: Its source repository opens publicly. Its repository had a push in the last 90 days. These are facts with their sources on this page, not a safety guarantee, and we did not run its tools.

Has io.github.pironjulien/nexus-agymail been security tested?

No. It could be started, but has not been tested; we call no server's tools for anything we publish. This is our limit, not the server's.

Does io.github.pironjulien/nexus-agymail publish a security policy?

Yes: its repository has a public security policy (github.com/pironjulien/nexusagymail/blob/HEAD/SECURITY.md). That is the publisher's statement, not permission for us to test the server, and we call none of its tools.

Where is the source code of io.github.pironjulien/nexus-agymail?

In github.com/pironjulien/NexusAGYmail, which opens publicly.

Found this page useful?

Anonymous · no sign-in

A quick, anonymous reaction — no account, no email. One per kind from your browser. The tally updates when the page is next refreshed, and it is only a rough count, never a safety rating or a measured number of people.

Compare with another server

Side by side: registry entry, our read-only session, the tools and the 18 classification fields. Same values as each page; no score.

Security testing

Has it been tested?

Feature #1

It could be started, but has not been tested; we call no server's tools for anything we publish. This is our limit, not the server's. — our limit

Reference

How is it classified?

18 fields

One value per field, each with its source. Fields written by AI models are marked. A field with no value says why.

TopicAI-classified
pending: added in the weekly update
listed 2026-11-01; not classified yet
Pricing modelAI-classified
pending: added in the weekly update
the website is not read yet
Programming language
api.github.com · 2026-11-01
Hosting type
registry · 2026-11-01
MCP capability
not checked
not read (no session)
Transport
standard input/output
registry · 2026-11-01
Required credentials
none declared
registry · 2026-11-01 · no declaration is not a guarantee
Package registry
registry · 2026-11-01
Freshness
0–30 days
registry updatedAt · 2026-11-01
Lifecycle status
registry · 2026-11-01
License class
does not apply
package ecosystem not queried by this layer (mcpb); only npm and PyPI are supported here
Integrity hash
does not apply
package ecosystem not queried by this layer (mcpb); only npm and PyPI are supported here
Signature / provenance
does not apply
package ecosystem not queried by this layer (mcpb); only npm and PyPI are supported here
Dependency advisories
not checked
only npm and PyPI packages are audited
Popularity
does not apply
package ecosystem not queried by this layer (mcpb); only npm and PyPI are supported here
Publisher signals
owner: a personal account · repository age: 0–30 days · stars: 0–9
api.github.com · 2026-11-01
Maintenance
api.github.com · 2026-11-01
Environment
your machine
where it runs, from the hosting type · 2026-11-01

“Not stated” means the source did not state it; “does not apply” means it does not apply to this kind of server; “our limit” means our own lookup failed. A linked value opens the directory filtered to the same value.

Cite or correct this page

Sources and corrections

Suggested citation

ProtocolProbe. “io.github.pironjulien/nexus-agymail: MCP server record.” Data checked 2026-11-01. https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/io.github.pironjulien/nexus-agymail

Figures are valid for the date shown. Our facts on this page are CC BY 4.0: reuse them with a link and the check date. Quoted text (the publisher’s descriptions, website quotes, tool names) is not ours to license.

As JSON: this record in the API · API documentation.

Badge for your README

ProtocolProbe: 5 of 5 record checks met

[![ProtocolProbe](https://protocolprobe.com/api/v1/badge/io.github.pironjulien/nexus-agymail)](https://protocolprobe.com/mcp/servers/io.github.pironjulien/nexus-agymail)

It shows this server's record-check count: facts from public records, no tool called. It is not a security rating or a pass. It links here and updates after each data reload.

Something wrong, or is this yours?

If a fact here is wrong, tell us and we will re-check it. If you operate this server, you can run our checks on it yourself with the free self-test command; we call no server’s tools ourselves for anything shown here.

Write to hello@protocolprobe.com · corrections log · methodology